Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.143 seconds)

May 01 1964 (HC)

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Firm Tirath Ram and Sons and a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1964

Reported in : [1966]36CompCas105(P& H)

..... the amount for which the property was insured on the date of such loss '. the tribunal held that an insurance against fire or riot is a contract of indemnity and the undertaking by the insurer is that, if the insured suffers any loss ' in respect of ' the insured property, the insurer will indemnify ..... because they had received rs. 27,000 from the central bank of india limited in respect of the insured goods and the contract of insurance had not provided for any indemnity exceeding that sum. on this view of the matter, the tribunal held that no relief could be allowed to the petitioners against ..... the insured to the extent of the actual loss the maximum limit of indemnity being the sum mentioned in the insurance contract. the point is that an insurance of this kind is not a contract to pay any sum of money on the happening of a contingency, as is the case ..... creditors of the insured and the insurer, and the creditors are entitled to recover from the insurer the amount, of the claim under the insurance contract. no double benefit accrues to the insured because out of the insurance claim the creditors have first to be satisfied and the insured receives only the ..... lost and that benefit must go to the insurer, for, otherwise, the insured would be receiving double benefit and making a profit out of the contract of insurance. this argument ignores the fact that these provisions are intended to regulate the rights and liabilities between a creditor and a debtor in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1964 (HC)

V.P. Rehbar Vs. Punjab State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-04-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H94; (1965)IILLJ392P& H

..... of preliminary enquiry is held against a temporary servant and following that enquiry the services are dispensed with in accordance with the contract or the specific service rule would not mean that the termination of service amounted to infliction of punishment of dismissal or removal within the meaning of article 311(2) would ..... of uttar pradesh 1955-1 scr 26: (air 1954 sc 369) that the motive or the including factor which influences the government to take action under the terms of the contract of employment or the specific service rule in irrelevant.'.later it was observed at page 11 (see air 1964 sc 1854 para 13) that :'the mere fact that some kind ..... probationer...... the appropriate authority possesses two powers to terminate the services of a temporary public servant; it can either discharge him purporting to exercise its power under the terms of contract or the relevant rule and in case of discharge and nothing more; in such a case , article 311 will not apply. the authority can also act under its power to ..... or other disqualification may be the motive or the inducing factor which influences the government to take action under the term of the contract of employment or the specific service rule, nevertheless, if a right exists, under the contract or the rules, to terminate the service the motive operating on the mind of the government is wholly irrelevant'. his lordship referred to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1964 (HC)

Milkha Singh Bhandu Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-15-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H297

..... (2) of the constitution if. however, the termination of his service is due to some other cause, he would be entitled to one month's notice if engaged on a contract for a definite period which does not provide for any other period of notice, and to a notice of 14 days if not engaged on a ..... contract. sub-rule (3) dealing with other railway servants provides for termination of their service on giving notice ranging from 1 month to 6 months no notice is, however, required in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1964 (HC)

H.C. SarIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-31-1964

Reported in : 1966CriLJ353

..... . hans dieter gottwald and that this firm failed to deliver the cranes to the government of india at the due date and so by virtue of the terms of the contract between the parties it was liable to pay $ 45,138-7-8d as liquidated damages for delayed supply. dr. gottwald while making the complaint to messrs, l. t. madani, j ..... petitioner's right to cross-examine the prosecution witnesses at dusseldorf. important documents relating to the inspections carried out in the essen area of west germany and of the gottwald contract were not fully supplied. the enquiry had not been held in accordance with rules of natural justice.(3) the petitioner was prohibited from leaving london with effect from 7th april ..... , the inspection work which was conducted by him was transferred by the indian railways to the german federal railways.3. messrs leo gottwald and company, dussel-dorf, entered into a contract with the government of india for supply of breakdown cranes required by the indian railways. this firm was a family concern of one dr. hans dieter gottwald, a lawyer by ..... profession. it so happened that the firm was not able to supply the cranes contracted for as undertaken and thereby according to the terms of the contract was liable to pay 45,138-7-8d as liquidated damages for delayed supply to the government of india. dr. gottwald reported on 8th september .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1964 (HC)

Bhag Singh and ors. Vs. Jawahar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-12-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H321

..... ' includes the right to hold the person claiming under the lease would be a tenant and a suit brought by him to recover damages for breach of contract or for specific performance of the contract should lie only in the revenue courts. i cannot see anything to justify so starting a change in the whole system of law nor do i know .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1964 (HC)

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-1964

Reported in : 1965CriLJ119

..... which he has had access owing to his position as a person who holds or has held office under government, or as a person who holds or has held a contract made on behalf of government, or as a person who is or has been employed under a person who holds or has held such an office or ..... contract:(a) wilfully communicates the code or pass word, sketch, plan, model) article, note, document or information to any person other than a parson to whom he is authorised to communicate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1964 (HC)

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H270

..... as a person who holds or has held a contra t made of behalf of government or as a person who is as person who holds or has held a contract made on behalf of government or as a person who is or has been employed under a person who holds or has held such an office or ..... contract: (a) willfully communicates the code or pass word sketch plan, model, article, note, document or information to any person other than a person to whom he is atuthorised to communicate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1964 (HC)

Partap RosIn and Turpentine Factory Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-24-1964

Reported in : AIR1966P& H16

..... forests is leased out to purchasers or contractors for resin extraction in public auctions. the removal of resin from these forests is regulated through permits according to the recovery of contract amount as per terms of sale agreements. a co-operative society, it is pleaded, does not represent any individual but consists of a number of members and in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1964 (HC)

Gurdip Kaur Vs. Ghamand Singh Dewa Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-1964

Reported in : AIR1965P& H238

..... machine, and cattle, all worth rs 2,00,000/-, which brought him a monthly income of rs 2,00/-. she further averred that her mother has died and father had contracted a second marriage 13 years back severing his connection with her and that she had no the means of livelihood, she went on to urge that the respondent after the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1964 (HC)

The State Vs. Om Parkash Salig Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-1964

Reported in : 1966CriLJ366

..... , on 2nd august, 1961.3. om parkash happened to have made a statement in court in proceedings against him for maintenance brought by paikasho under section 488, criminal procedure code, that he contracted second marriage at jammu with the consent of his wife parkasho. her how ever in his later statement which he made in defiance on 23rd may, 1962, under the charge .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //