Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.028 seconds)

Feb 07 1967 (HC)

District Board, Hoshiarpur Vs. F. Hira Singh Jagat Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-07-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H289

..... boards act and it is such a place which is the seat of the lawyer's business. the learned judges held that the place where the contract is entered into and where the vakalatnama is signed, is the place where the lawyer carries on his profession or trade and that if his office ..... 22 of the sale of goods act has therefore, no application to this case from the evidence on record, it appears that the purchasers enter into unconditional contracts for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, they pay for the same at the shop and then obtain delivery of the same from the ..... of putting them into a deliverable state, the property does not pass until such thing is done and the buyer has notice thereof. 22. where there a contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, but the seller is bound to weigh, measure, fast or do some other act or thing ..... where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an agreement to sell. an agreement to sell becomes a sale when the time elapses or the conditions are fulfilled subject to which the property ..... the parties, may first be enumerated:-- (i) firm hira singh jagat singh plaintiff-respondent, whom i will call the dealer in this judgment, enters into contracts with its customers at its shop situated on the bank road within the municipal limits of hoshiarpur and outside the area administered by the district board. the dealer .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1967 (HC)

Pritam Singh Brar Vs. State of Punjab Through Secretary to Govt., Punj ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-26-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H189

..... special considerations and that is a matter with which we are not concerned. the increase in the age of superannuation from 55 to 58 has not been incorporated in the contract of the government servants, who joined service before the age of superannuation was raised from 55 to 58. therefore, no government servant whose age of superannuation was 55, can claim ..... v. state of punjab, letters patent appeal no. 111 of 1965 d/- 14-3-1964 (punj). it is to be found in the following observations: 'with these government servants, the contract of service was that they would retire at the age of 55, they took up service, when the rule providing superannuation made incumbent on all government servants, excepting class iv .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 1967 (HC)

Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-03-1967

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ674P& H

..... to which a worker may be entitled under any other law, or under the terms of any award, agreement or contract of service. there is a proviso to this sub-section which lays down that when such award, agreement or contract of service provides for longer annual leave with wages than provided in this chapter the worker shall be entitled only to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1967 (HC)

Mangal Singh S/O. Shiv Dayal Singh Vs. Punjab State (Now Haryana State ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-09-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H306

1. the appellant, mangal singh, in this appeal under clause 10 of the letters patent from the order, dated april 24 1967, of a learned single judge, was confirmed as an assistant in a substantive capacity in the punjab civil secretariat cadre of assistants on march 2, 1956. respondent 2, j. p. chaudhri, and respondent 3, chaman lal, were assistants in their parent departments at the time. of them respondent 2 was in the buildings and roads branch of the public works department, and respondent 3 was either in the same branch of that department or in the irrigation or the public health and electricity branch. in his parent office respondent no. 2 was confirmed as an assistant on july 22, 1950 (annexure 'r. 6' to his return), and respondent 3 was confirmed as in assistant on august 1, 1948. the scales of pay and the conditions of service of the two respondents in their parent departments were identical with those of the assistants in the punjab civil secretariat cadre of assistants. so it is apparent that in the office of an assistant in his parent department either of those two respondents was confirmed long before the confirmation of the appllent as an assistant in the punjab civil secretariat. 2. the office of the secretary incharge and of the head of department as chief engineer in the p. w. d. irrigation branch and buildings and roads branch as also public health and electricity branch was held by the same officer before the year 1956-57, but in that year it was decided, as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1967 (HC)

Sodagar Singh and ors. Vs. Smt. Sham Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-04-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H341

..... by an order of a revenue officer. even a voluntary agreement to curtail the period of limitation for filing suit is declared to be void by section 28 of the contract act. in this view of the matter, the decision of the subordinate judge, patti dismissing the appellant's suit as barred by time, is wholly untenable. the learned additional district .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1967 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Giani Bir Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-13-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H479

..... other creditor on that date? 2 if issue no. 1 is not proved, whether the suit, as framed, is maintainable? 3. whether the defendant no. 1 committed am breach of contract as alleged by the plaintiff? 4. if issue no. 3 is proved, what loss did the plaintiff suffer? 5. whether the plaintiff withdrew the case of recovery of compensation against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1967 (HC)

Munshi Ram and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner, Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-30-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H162

shamsher bahadur, j. 1. this, judgment will dispose of five companion letters patent appeals, nos. 47 to 51 of 1967, instituted jointly by the five brothers. munshi ram, mohn ram. bhagwan dass, bhoja ram and satnam dass against five different tenants of their ioint holding, as well as lpa no. 167 of 1967 (punj). bhoj raj v. state of punjab. in all these six appeals, there is a common question relating to the scope and interpretation of the definition of 'permissible area' in sub-section (3) of section 2 of the punjab security of land tenures act. 1953 (hereinafter called the act). the five letters patent appeals nos. 47 to 51 of 1967 directed against the judgment of sharma j. of 24th november, 1966. were admitted by a division bench of chief justice and harbans singh j. on 23rd of march, 1967 for hearing before a full bench, there being a submission both before the learned single judge and the admitting bench that an observation of narula j., speaking for the court (dua j. and myself concurring), in the full bench decision of khan chand v state of punjab, 1966-68 pun lr 543 = (air 1966 punj 423). seems to overrule by implication the ratio decidendi of the division bench case of nathu v. state of punjab. 1964 lah lt 56, though it had otherwise been followed and approved. the same point was raised in l.p.a no. 167 of 1967. from the judgment of d.k. mahajan j. of 17th march. 1967 (punj), which was also admitted by the bench of chief justice and harbans singh j. on 5th may, 1967, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1967 (HC)

State Bank of India Vs. Controller of Estate Duty and Another.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-28-1967

Reported in : [1968]69ITR270(P& H)

..... if by means of the surrender of such interest or right the property is subsequently enjoyed to the entire exclusion of the settlor and of any benefit to him by contract or otherwise, for at least two years before his death.explanation. - a settlor reserving an interest in the settled property for the maintenance of himself and any of his relatives ..... and, secondly, that at least for two years before the settlors death, the property was enjoyed to the entire exclusion of the settlor and of any benefit to him by contract or otherwise. it does not appear from the statement of the case that there was any positive act or writing by the settlor whereby he surrendered the right of revocation .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1967 (HC)

Hukum Singh Nadir Singh Vs. Hakumat Rai Nihal Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H110

..... defect and thus his pleading is something opposite to what he has to plead to successfully pre-empt a sale. the learned judges laid down that a covenant for indemnity is not a covenant running with the land and therefore if a transfer is in invitum, it does not pass to the transferee. on that basis, the ..... ilr 7 all 775 observed thus:'the right of pre-emption is not a right of re-purchase either from the vendor or from the vendee, involving any new contract of sale; but it is simply a right of substitution, entitling the pre-emptor, by reason of a legal incident to which the sale itself was subject, to ..... p 809) (f.b.):'..... the right of pre-emption is not a right of 're-purchase' either from the vendor or from the vendee, involving any new contract of sale: but it is simply a right of substitution, entitling the pre-emptor by reason of a legal incident to which the sale itself was subject to stand ..... in the tenancy act, a 'landlord' is defined to mean a person under whom a tenant holds land and to whom the tenant is, or but for a special contract would be, liable to pay rent for that land. sub-section (7) of section 4 of the tenancy act provides that the expressions 'tenant' and 'landlord' include ..... 4 of the tenancy act, a 'tenant' is defined as below:--'tenant1 means a person who holds land under another person, and is, or but for a specil contract would be, liable to pay rent (or that land to that other person: but it does not include (a) an inferior land-owner, or(b) a mortgagee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1967 (HC)

S. Umrao Singh Vs. Darbara Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-19-1967

Reported in : AIR1968P& H450

..... samiti is a local authority being, a corporate body having perpetual succession, and common seal. it has the power to acquire, hold and dispose of property and to enter into contracts. it can sue ana be sued as such. the combined reading of these provisions leaves no manner of doubt that by no stretch of reasoning, can the panchayat samiti be ..... tahsil or block for which it is constituted, be a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire, hold and dispose of property and to contract and shall by the said name sue or be sued, (3) x x x x x' section 5 relates to the constitution of panchayal samitis tt is significant to note .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //