Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.038 seconds)

Mar 13 1969 (HC)

Jagan Nath Piare Lal Vs. Mittar SaIn and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-13-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H104

..... effected, does not create a fresh tenancy in favour of the mortgagee. but there is nothing to prevent the tenant to surrender his earlier tenancy and enter into a fresh contract of tenancy with the mortgagee; and in each case, it will have to be determined on evidence, whether a tenant of the mortgagor did surrender his tenancy and obtained a ..... any such specific provision in the contract of mortgage i am of the opinion that the tenant did not surrender his rights, and that the intention of the parties to the mortgage must be interpreted as being ..... by the mortgage, and that the owner would be entitled to immediate possession on the redemption of the mortgage, this would have been bound to be specified in the mortgage contract and there would in the agreement have been an express surrender by the mortgagee of the rights secured by him as a tenant under the act. in the absence of ..... the tenant in the tenancy on the redemption of the mortgage is a question of fact to be decided according to the terms of the contract between the parties in each case. in this case, the contract is completely silent as to what was to happen if and when the mortgage was redeemed, and it seems quite possible that no trouble at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1969 (HC)

Bishamber Dutt Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Gian Chand Charan Das

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-15-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H60

..... when the act was applicable to the building concerned, yet if the pre-decessor-in-interest could seek ejectment on the ground of subletting because of the terms of the contract or any special law or rules that are applicable, it can well be argued that the transferee should be entitled to take advantage of such a subletting if the same ..... given is that under the ordinary law of the land, a landlord can get rid of his tenant at any time he likes, unless prohibited by the terms of the contract, by giving the requisite notice. by the act, the tenant is given protection from such an ejectment and the landlord can seek ejectment only on the grounds mentioned in the ..... under which any such requirement can be imposed upon the tenant. the only other situation in which such requirement can be imposed upon a tenant is a term of the contract of tenancy but no such argument and basis of the term of tenancy has been urged in the present case nor do i understand was there any such argument in ..... restriction act because immediately after the transfer the exemption goes. however, in view of section 29 of the rehabilitation act, the landlord cannot eject his tenant notwithstanding any terms of contract between the parties. proviso to section 29(1) of the rehabilitation act is in the following terms:--'provided that notwithstanding anything contained in any such terms and conditions, no such .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1969 (HC)

Madan Lal Lamba Vs. Inderjit Mehta

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-19-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H200; 1970CriLJ726

..... sub-divisional officer to maintain the officer's note book and to make correct entries representing the actual supplies of stone ballast made by the respondent in execution of his contract work. the petitioner prepared page 11 of the officer's note book in his official capacity. if the petitioner while preparing page 11 of the officer's note book or ..... supplied 1400 cubic feet of stone ballast to madan lal lamba in his capacity as sub-divisional officer in charge of the contract. the sub-divisional officer checked the material on june 3, 1964. he made an entry at page 11 in the officer's note book no. 35. therunning bill of the ..... by a complaint filed by inderjit mehta for offence under section 218, indian penal code was not necessary.2. briefly stated, the facts are that inderjit mehta entered into a contract on april 25, 1964 for supply of stone ballast to the public works department of the punjab government for construction of lassara nala and bhatinda-dabwali road.3. inderjit mehta .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1969 (HC)

Puran Chand Hari Parshad Vs. Mangal Nanak Saini

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-1969

Reported in : AIR1969P& H367

..... date of the application for eviction, the only way to compensate the landlord for the loss of interest on the amount which should have been in his hands under the contract much earlier, is to pay him the interest up to the date when the amount is actually paid out. any other construction of the provision for payment of interest would ..... has enacted in sub-section (1) of section 13 of the act that a lease would not be forfeited in spite of the breach of an express condition of the contract of lease, it has been ensured that the landlord is not unjustly deprived of the main consideration for which he demised the property in favour of tenant by giving it ..... amount of the increase in such rate, cess or tax, as the case may be. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or any contract, no landlord shall recover from his tenant the amount of any tax of any portion thereof in respect of any building or rented land occupied by such tenant by any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1969 (HC)

Smt. Ram Piari Vs. Piara Lal P.C.S. Divisional Agricultural Officer, P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H341

..... the earlier sections of the act. these words were held not to restrict the application of section 25 to only those cases where a party was in a position to contract a second marriage or where the marriage bond stood dissolved or severed. this condition was supposed to govern the conduct of the parties in future and the maintenance order could ..... of by the applicant only as long as he had remained immarried meaning thereby that in spite of his being in a position to do so. the applicant had not contracted another marriage.2. in surjit kaur v. pargat singh, ilr (1964) 2 punj 100, a ruling mentioned in the order of reference, shamsher bahadur, j. took the view that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 1969 (HC)

Dayal Saran Sanan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-23-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H75

..... mentioned in the memorandum that it had been reported that the petitioner had been insolent and insubordinate to his superiors, and had not cared to study the provisions of the contract in question. in paragraph 3 of this communication, it was mentioned that the petitioner had been struck off the strength of garrison. engineer lalru, on february 12, 1965,on permanent .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1969 (HC)

Hazari and ors. Vs. Zila Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P&H215

..... limitation.timefrom which period begins to run.' enforce a right ofpre-emption whether the right is foundedon law or general usage or on special year.when the purchaser takes underthe sale sought to be impeached, physical possession of the whole or part ofthe property sold, or where the ..... right to execute the decree in which he alone has the real interest, it is an extension of the equitable doctrine that a man who contracts to transfer any interest or property which has not yet come into existence must in equity be treated to be intending to transfer that interest or ..... periodof limitation.timefrom which period begins to enforce right of pre-emptionwhether the right is founded on law or general usage or on special contract.oneyear.when the purchaser takes under hesale sought to he impeached, physical possession of he whole or part of theproperty sold, or where the subject ..... suit.periodof limitation.timefrom which period begins to enforce right of preemptionwhether the right is founded un law or general usage or on special contract.oneyear.from the time purchaser takes,under the sale, sought to be impeached, physical possession of the whole ofthe property sold, or, where the ..... as follows:-- '* * * the right of pre-emption is not a right of re-purchase either from the vendor or from the vendee involving any new contract of sale; but it is simply a right of substitution, entitling the pre-emptor, by reason of a legal incident to which the sale itself was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1969 (HC)

Sunder Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H241

p.c. pandit, j.1. this order will dispose of two connected writ petitions nos. 1164 and 1481 of 1964. counsel for the parties are agreed that the decision in the former petition will govern the other as well. i will, therefore, refer to the facts in civil writ 1164 of 1964.2. hardial malik, sunder lal & kahan chand, all employees of irrigation branch in the public works department, punjab government, filed a petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution against the state of punjab and the chief engineer, irrigation branch (south) punjab, respondents nos. 1 and 2. subsequently, about 200 persons, whose seniority would be affected if the writ petition was allowed, were also impleaded as respondents. the petitioners were appointed as assistant clerks in the said department on 25th september, 1946, 17th february 1947 and 9th june, 1947, respectively. they had been working as civilian clerks in the armed forces during the second world war and it was after their release from the armed forces that they joined the irrigation department as assistant clerks in a temporary capacity. later, by an order dated 29th october, 1956, they were confirmed as assistant clerks with effect from 1st february, 1949. subsequently, they were promoted as sub-divisional clerks, then as accounts clerks and thereafter as head clerks. according to them, they were entitled to the benefit of the punjab government services (war) amendment rules, 1943 (hereinafter called the rules) which were .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1969 (HC)

Kanianwali Co-operative Farming Society at Kanianwali Through Its Secr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H157

..... will not affect the right of the land owner to receive rent from the tenant so settled. 19-a.(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law, custom, usage, contract or agreement from and after the commencement of the punjab security of land tenures (amendment) ordinance, 1958, no person whether, as land-owner, or tenant, shall acquire or possess by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1969 (HC)

Parson Kaur Vs. Bakshish Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-07-1969

Reported in : 1971CriLJ489

..... of the property then the making of the award as properly understood must involve the communication of the offer to the party concerned. that is the normal requirement under the contract law and its applicability to cases of award made under the act cannot be reasonably excluded. thus considered the date of the award cannot be determined solely by reference to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //