Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.028 seconds)

Apr 04 1977 (HC)

Smt. Jaswant Kaur Vs. Harpal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-04-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H341

..... 1) of the act. section 14(2) would not be applicable to such case. on the other hand, if a hindu female expressly enters into a contract restricting the interest already possessed by her, the interest so restricted of her own volition or agreement would not get enlarged as & result of section 14(1). ..... section 14(2) as was pointed out in rangaawami naicker v. chinnammal, air 1964 mad 387, was not to interfere with contracts' grants or decree etc. by virtue of wtiich woman's right was restricted though the disability on woman imposed by law was removed by section 14(1). ..... a man. so too a propositus may bequeath a restricted estate in property to a woman. nor is there any bar to a woman entering into a contract with someone for good consideration restricting her estate in property possessed by her. in sampuran singh v. labh singh, i had said, 'the clear object of ..... 17) that section 14 of the hindu succession act is not intended to interfere with the freedom to give, the freedom to bequeath and the freedom to contract. a donor is not barred by section 14 from giving a restricted estate in property to a woman. it is not pretended that he may not ..... the property was mutated in favour of his widow. subsequently the collaterals of her deceased husband filed a suit for possession on the ground that she had contracted karewa marriage and had forfeited her rights in the property. she resisted the suit and denied the allegation of karewa. during the pendency of the suit, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1977 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Gupta Vs. Om Parkash Alipuria

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-01-1977

Reported in : 1977CriLJ1416

..... , or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits 'criminal breach of trust.according to this .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1977 (HC)

Nandlal Sohanlal, Jullundur Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Patial ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-24-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H320; [1977]110ITR170(P& H)

..... , namely, when a new partner is taken or an existing partner retires with the consent of all the partners' or without their consent if the contract of partnership so provides. but where a firm is dissolved either by agreement of the partners or by operation of law and another firm takes over ..... be usefully referred to:-- '39. the dissolution of partnership between all the partners of a firm is called the 'dissolution of the firm'.' '42 subject to contract between the partners, a firm is dissolved- xxx (c) by the death of a partner; and x x x' as against the above, the indian income ..... act, namely, when a new partner is taken or an existing partner retires with the consent of all the partners or without their consent if the contract of partnership so provides, but where a firm is dissolved either by agreement of the partners or by operation of law and another firm takes over ..... of the firm without any final settlement of accounts as between them and the outgoing partner or his estate, then, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, the outgoing partner or his estate is entitled at the option of himself or his representatives to such share of the profits made ..... who enter into partnership with one another are individually called 'partners' and collectively 'a firm'. section 31 of this act lays down that subject to contract between the partners and to the provisions of section 30, which relates to minors being admitted to the benefits of a partnership, no person shall be introduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1977 (HC)

Radha Ram Badri Nath and ors. Vs. Amritsar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-08-1977

Reported in : (1977)79PLR387

..... or any other person having, for the time being, charge of the management or control of the industrial undertaking, whether by or under the orders of any court, or any contract or instrument or otherwise, to make over the management of such undertaking or the concerned part, as the case may be, to the authorised person and thereupon the authorised person .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1977 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Amrit Banaspati Co., Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H268

..... said :--'there can be no estoppel, legal or equitable, against the statute. what the legislature has prescribed must be done and no authority can contract itself or others out of what is prescribed by the legislature. we are firmly of the opinion that the statutory right and duty to levy tax ..... the government should be bound to carry out the promises made by it, even though the promise was not recorded in the form of a formal contract as required by the constitution. finally, they said--'under our jurisprudence, the government is not exempt from liability to carry out the representation made ..... undertaking. they were bound by it so long ag it was not in conflict with their statutory duty, it is said that a corporation cannot contract itself out of its statutory duties..... but that principle does not mean that a corporation can give an undertaking and break it as they please. ..... agent without authority to act for the government in the premises. so far, however, as the united states acts in a proprietary capacity or enters into contract relationships, an estoppel may be asserted against it provided the functions of the government are not impaired thereby. in other words, the law of estoppel, ..... enactment and enforcement of police measures. a state cannot be estopped by the unauthorised acts or representations of its officers...... on the other hand, a contract or deed lawfully made by a state may create an estoppel against it if the effect of the estoppel will not be to impair the exercise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1977 (HC)

Gurbaksh Singh Sibia Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-13-1977

Reported in : 1978CriLJ20

s.s. sandhawalia, j.1. the purpose, nature and scope of the power to grant anticipatory bail rested in the higher echelons of the judiciary by section 438 of the code of criminal procedure has been the subject--matter of debate before the full bench in these two petitioners for bail which are before us on a reference.2. on the 26th of august, 1977, shri gurbachan singh behniwal, i. p. s. superintendent of police, vigilance squad, forwarded a special report to the police station. civil lines, ludhiana, on the basis of which a case under s. 5(1)(d) and (e) read with s. 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act and ss. 406, 409, 477a and 120b of the indian penal code, was registered. in the said report it was alleged inter alia that shri zail singh, former chief minister of the congress government in punjab along with some members of his council of ministers, some office-bearers of the punjab pradesh congress committee, some appointees to high public offices and senior ranking government officials had conspired to collect huge funds for the holding of the congress party session at mattaur near chandigarh and to personally amass wealth by abuse of authority and misuse of powers.3. in pursuance of the said conspiracy. shri zail singh aforesaid accompanied by shri joginder pal pandey, then state minister of public works department and shri sat pal mittal (petitioner) then general secretary of the punjab pradesh congress committee held a meeting at ludhiana in which leading .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1977 (HC)

Jai Hanuman Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-12-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H314; [1977]110ITR36(P& H)

o. chinnappa reddy, j.1. for the assessment years 1965-66, 1966-67 and 1969-70, the petitioner submitted returns of income of rs. 31,291, 20,649 and 1,004 respectively. the pelitioner's income for those years was assessed by the income-tax officer at rs. 44,040; 23,040 and 1,250 respectively. in the balance sheets submitted along with the returns amounts of rs. 51,735; 32,705 and 16,915 were shown as received on account of charity: the income-tax officer did not direct the addition of the amounts received on account of charity to the income returned by the petitioner. he did not question the correctness of the figures either. while so, on 28-3-74. the income-tax officer issued three notices under section 148 of the income-tax act, 1961, alleging that he had reasons to believe that the income chargeable to tax for the three assessment years in question had escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the income-tax act, and. requiring the petitioner to submit returns of income within thirty days of the service of notices as he proposed to reassess the income for the said assessment years. these notices were served on the petitioner on 2-4-74. the petitioner objected to the validity of the notices and demanded the disclosure of the reasons on which the income-tax officer grounded his belief thai income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment. the petitioner received no reply. the petitioner, therefore, filed c.w.p. nos. 2808, 2809 and 2810 of 1975 impugning the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //