Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.035 seconds)

Nov 12 1980 (HC)

Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sant Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-12-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H143

..... lal, 1964-66 pun lr 804.it has been held in oriental fire & general insurance co limited's case (supra).'it is well settled that a contract of insurance is nothing but a contract of indemnity. the policy issued is with reference to a specified vehicle owned by the policy holder and consequently the policy remains effective while the policy holder retains an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 1980 (HC)

Punjab State Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. Vs. Com ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-29-1980

Reported in : (1980)18CTR(P& H)71; [1981]128ITR189(P& H)

..... the assessee received the goods as consignee, is again a neutral factor. the liability of the assessee to pay interest from the date of consignment is again a matter of contract between the parties. these factors do not, in any manner, bring out the relationship of buyer and seller. from what has been stated above, in our considered opinion, the tribunal ..... of sale providing for the margin of profit, and consequently the supplying source exercising control over the selling or distributing agency. however, these restrictions per se would not convert a contract of sale into one of agency, because in spite of these restrictions the transaction may, in a given case, still be a sale and subject to all the incidents of ..... a sale. it is well settled that a contract of agency differs essentially from a contract of sale, inasmuch as an agent after taking delivery of the property, does not sell it as his own property, but sells the same as the property .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1980 (HC)

Ajit Kaur and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-1980

Reported in : AIR1981P& H8

harbans lal, j. 1. the important question of law which falls for determination by the full bench is as to whether the land declared surplus under the provisions of the punjab security of land tenures act, (hereinafter called the punjab law), but yet not utilised not in possession of the government at the time of the enforcement of the punjab land reforms act. 1973, (hereinafter to be called the act of 1973), was vested in the government for the purpose of its utilization though on account of the death of the original landowner the entire land including the surplus land may have devolved upon the heirs and in consequence thereof the land in the share of each heir as a result of devolution by law may have been reduced so as to fall within the premissible limit.2. the necessity foe the reference of this question to the full bench arose because the correctness of law as enunciated in the secy. to government, punjab, revenue department v. jagar singh, 1977 pun lj 88 : (air 1977 punj & har 114) was doubted by the learned counsel for the writ petition was argued in the first instance, it was a fit case for re-consideration of the said decision by a larger bench. in order to appreciate the contentions on both sides in their proper perspective, it is appropriate to bear in mind the legislative history of the land reforms in punjab.3. after the enforcement of the constitution of india in 1950, reform in agrarian economy in the country through proper legislation was given top priority. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1980 (HC)

Brij Mohan Vs. the Chief Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1980

Reported in : AIR1980P& H236

..... , and section 109 provided that if the lessor transferred the property leased or any part thereof or any part of his interest therein, the transferee, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, should possess all the rights of the lessor as to the property transferred and the lahore high court approved the rule of english law referred to in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //