Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.029 seconds)

Nov 20 1984 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jolly Engineers and Contractors (P) L ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-20-1984

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas808(P& H)

..... of any express stipulation to the contrary in the policy, the moment the insured parts with the car, the policy relating to it lapses. the insurance policy being a contract of personal indemnity, the insurers cannot be compelled to accept responsibility in respect of a third party who may be quite unknown to them.'12. finally, as regards the contention that in ..... even if the original policyholder continues to be shown as the registered owner of the vehicle concerned. the rationale behind this being that a policy of insurance is a contract of personal indemnity and the insurer cannot, therefore, be compelled to accept responsibility in respect of a third party, who may be quite unknown to him. mr.l.m, suri, counsel for ..... the high court of madhya pradesh in balwant singh v. jhanubai [1980] acj 126, where it was held :' it is also well-settled law that a contract of insurance is nothing but a contract of indemnity. the policy is with reference to a specified vehicle owned by the policy holder and consequently the policy remains effective while the policyholder retains an interest in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1984 (HC)

State of Punjab Vs. Himachal Government Timber Depot

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-29-1984

Reported in : [1985]58STC265(P& H)

..... and was also reiterated before us that the property in goods had passed to the purchasing dealers from the moment of the fall of the hammer and therefore, the sale contract was complete between the parties and from that it could not be inferred that the goods were purchased for being transported outside the state of punjab and thus amounted to ..... trade or commerce.7. in the present case not only the goods in question had moved out of punjab state to outside state directly as a result of the given contract of sales but the said sales were, in fact, intended by the parties to be inter-state sales as the purchasing dealers who were registered outside the state of punjab ..... various states; that the movement of the said goods from the state of punjab to other states had been occasioned by the given sales contract only, i.e., there had been no other intervening contract between the sales contracts in question and the movement of those goods from the state of punjab to other states.5. section 3(a) of the central sales ..... is accepted that the property in goods passed to the purchasing dealers immediately with the fall of the hammer and the contract of sale being complete, condition no. 8 of the terms and conditions of auction became part of the said contract and therefore, it would have to be taken that the purchasing dealers gave an undertaking to transfer the goods outside .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1984 (HC)

Niemla Textile Finishing Mills P. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer and Anot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-30-1984

Reported in : (1985)45CTR(P& H)263; [1985]152ITR429(P& H)

bains j. - petitioner company is registered as a private limited company under the companies act, 1956, and is engaged in dyeing, scouring, singeing, milling and finishing of textiles of all varieties, namely, woollen, cotton, synthetic fabrics, etc. under s. 280zb of the i.t. act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), the petitioner company is entitled to tax credit certificate after the conditions as enshrined in the aforesaid section are fulfilled. the petitioner company is to pay tax for the assessment year commencing from april 1, 1965, which is deemed to be the base years following that year to tax credit certificate for the amounts mentioned in that section. the maximum which can be granted is 10% of the tax payable by the company for the years succeeding the base year. it is alleged that in the base year for the period commencing from april 1, 1965, to march 25, 1970, on an income of rs. 71,645 to a tax liability of rs. 34, 672 and thus for the years 1966-67, 1968-70, the petitioner-company became entitled to tax credit certificates as was envisaged under s. 280zb, read with the tax credit certificate (corporation tax) scheme, 1966.the petitioner-company is also registered under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, since it employed more than 50 workmen and is engaged in the industry mentioned in item no. 23 of schedule i.the petitioner-company filed an application or the year 1966-67, on april 16,1971, and for the year 1968-69, on april 17, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1984 (HC)

Gurbachan Kaur Vs. Savita Kapoor and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-25-1984

Reported in : II(1984)ACC200

s.s. sodhi, j.1. travelling on his scooter on the patiala malerkotla road, varinder kumar was trying to over-take a tractor going a head, when this tractor suddenly turned to its right to go on to the link road to village dhingi. in the resultant accident, varinder kumar sustained injuries and was killed. this happened on january 3, 1979.2. it was the finding of the tribunal that the accident had been caused entirely due to the negligence of the driver of the tractor puc-4974. a sum of rs. 55,000/- was awarded as compensation to the claimants, they being the widow and two minor children of the deceased as also his parents. the liability for the payment of the amount awarded was fastened wholly upon smt. gurbachan kaur, who was held to be owner of the tractor.3. in appeal smt. guibachan kaur in the first instance challenged the finding of negligence recorded against the driver of the tractor. in the alternative she raised the plea that the liability for the payment of the amount awarded was at any rate that of the respondent insurance company as the tractor stood with it on the date of the accident.4. the claimants in their appeal sought enhanced compensation.5. on the point of negligence, the case set up by the claimants was that the tractor had suddenly turned towards its right without any signal or warning and it was then that it hit against the scooter with such great force that the deceased was crushed under the wheel of the tractor-trolly and died at the spot.6. smt. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1984 (HC)

Babu Ram Golyani and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-29-1984

Reported in : [1984]57STC17(P& H)

..... comprehends the power to impose tax, to prescribe machinery for collecting the tax, to designate officers by whom the liability may be imposed and to prescribe the authority, obligation and indemnity of the officers. the state legislature may sunder the entry be competent to enact a law in respect of matters necessarily incidental to 'taxes on the sale and purchase of ..... , of a place of loading or unloading of goods or of a railway out-agency, city booking office or city booking agency, when run by a private person under a contract with the railways but excluding a rail head or a post office or of a goods-carrier carrying such goods or a person who accepts consignments of such goods for ..... of, consignments of goods at a railway station, booking agency goods transport company office, or any place of loading or unloading of goods or contrives, makes and concludes bargains and contracts for or on behalf of any dealer for a fee, reward, commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration or otherwise;(ii) 'person transporting goods' shall, besides the owner, include the manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1984 (HC)

Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Beasa Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-27-1984

Reported in : I(1985)ACC160; AIR1985P& H96; [1986]59CompCas643(P& H)

..... shall be liable to pay the amount awarded to the person named in the award or awards.11. mr. gandhi, however, argued that the liability of the insurer is to indemnity the insured and if for instance the owner of the offending vehicle had not taken out any policy at all and if someone was to incorrectly and falsely make the ..... , being one of the following conditions, namely :-- i) a condition excluding the use of the vehicle-- a) for hire or reward, where the vehicle is on the date of the contract of insurance a vehicle not covered by a permit to ply for hire or reward, or b) for organised racing and speed-testing; or c) for purpose not allowed by ..... in the vehicle, or (ii) except where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or in pursuance of a contract of employment, to cover liability in respect of the death of or bodily injury to persons being carried in or upon or entering or mounting or alighting from the vehicle .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1984 (HC)

Ajit Kumar JaIn Vs. Jagir Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-21-1984

Reported in : AIR1984P& H328

..... date, the rent for the month of december, 1979, had also become due. thus, the total period for which the rent had become due was 21 months. according to the contract between the parties, the tenant was liable to pay rent at the rate of rs. 40/- per month plus house-tax. the tenant is always apprehensive while depositing the rent .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 30 1984 (HC)

Mange Ram Vs. Brij Mohan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-30-1984

Reported in : AIR1985P& H6

..... . it is stated that on 16-5-1982 the returned candidate accompanied by his father sh. sita ram, comrade ram kishan and sh. amrit lal visited village kandela. there they contracted sh. dalip singh, sarpanch of the village panchayat, and shri dewan singh, secretary of the backward classes community. the electors of the backward classes were collected in the house of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //