Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1995 Page 3 of about 28 results (0.026 seconds)

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-07-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR387

..... statute governing the person making the representation provides otherwise result in an agreement enforceable at law if the statute requires that the agreement shall be in a certain form no contract may result from the representation and acting, therefore, but the law is not powerless to raise in appropriate cases an enquiry against him to compel performance of the obligation arising ..... actually in existence raise an estoppel, if another person alters his position relying upon the representation. a representation that something will be done in the future may result in a contract, if another person to whom it is addressed acts upon it. a representation that something will be done in future, is not a representation that it is true when made ..... defence of executive necessity is of limited scope. it only avails the crown where there is an implied term to the effect or that is the true meaning of the contract.' 44. in turner morrison and co. ltd. v. hungerford investment trust ltd., a.i.r. 1972 s.c. 1311, the principles enunciated in anglo afghan's case (supra) were considered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1995 (HC)

Gleason Works Vs. Punjab Tractors Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-09-1995

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas992(P& H)

..... respondent was not responsible. a civil suit has already been filed for claiming damages. as to what would be the effect of cancellation of the contract and how much damages under these circumstances may/can be awarded to the petitioner shall have to be adjudicated upon which cannot be said to be ..... petitioner argued that in the cancellation clause which has been reproduced in the earlier part of this judgment, it is clear that damages for cancellation of contract were 100 per cent where the work had been completed; that in the present case, work had already been completed by the petitioner and the ..... exclude the right to claim an unascertained sum of money as damages. the right to claim liquidated damages is enforceable under section 74 of the contract act and where such a right is found to exist no question of ascertaining damages really arises. where the parties have deliberately specified the amount ..... petition because it involves disputed questions of facts. undoubtedly, the amount claimed in this petition as due from the respondent-company is on account of contract entered between respondent no. 1 and gleason works s.a. this amount is an ascertained sum of money which can be said to be an ..... to the filing of the present petition in which the claim made is the same as in the present case; that there was no privity of contract between the petitioner and respondent no. 1 and, therefore, this petition was not maintainable. on the merits, the averments made in the petition have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1995 (HC)

Equipment Conductors and Cables Ltd. Vs. Haryana State Electricity Boa ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-13-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR604

..... these two supply orders has been received by the petitioner. it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent-board did not make the payment as stipulated in the contract i.e. payment/payments have been made somewhat late and since as per ordinance the petitioner is legally entitled to interest on all such delayed payments such an amount is ..... stated that the plea raised is wholly frivolous and devoid of merit. according to the answering respondent the petitioner did not supply the material as per the terms of the contract and as a result of the same the petitioner is liable to pay penalty for delay in delivering the goods which amount is recoverable from the petitioner as per the ..... contract. in fact, excess amount has already been paid which the respondent can legally recover. otherwise too, as per the original agreement between the parties the matter could be referred to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1995 (HC)

Jai Bhagwan Vs. Chandra Mohan and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-19-1995

Reported in : AIR1996P& H52

..... , (1928) all elr 458 (chancery division), retrospective operation of a statute was explained in the following words :--''retrospective', used with reference to a statute, may mean that the statute affects contracts existing at the date when it comes into operation. a statute may be more properly described as retrospective because it applies to transactions completed, or to right and remedies accrued ..... into force. it may apply, again, to such matters as procedure and evidence. but, although a statute may affect an existing contract, it cannot have the effect of making lawful ex post facto something which constituted a breach of that contract when it was done. a fortiori is this so when an action for the breach has been committed before the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 1995 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adviser to the Administration, Union Terri ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-01-1995

Reported in : AIR1996P& H69

..... government must be in public interest; the government cannot act arbitrarily and without reasonand if it does, its action would be liable to be invalidated. if the government awards a contract or leases out or otherwise deals with its property or grants any other largess, it would be liable to be tested for its validity on the touch-stone of reasonableness ..... be unconstitutional and invalid.' it was further held (at p. 2001 of air):'where the government is dealing with the public, whether by way of giving jobs or entering into contracts or granting other forms of largess, the government cannot act arbitrarily at its sweet-will and, like a private individual, deal with any person it pleases, but its action must .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1995 (HC)

Bhim Sen and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-20-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR617

..... of the act. section 19 reads as under :-'19. power to vary or cancel lease or allotment of any property acquired under this act.--(1) notwithstanding anything contained in any contract or any other law for the time being in force but subject to any rules that may be made under this act, the managing officer or managing corporation may cancel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1995 (HC)

General Manager, Punjab Roadways and anr. Vs. Dyal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1995

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ187P& H; (1995)110PLR281

..... dismissal or demotion is unlawful and, therefore, the employee continues to be the workman of the employer and is entitled to the benefits due to him under a pre-existing contract, cannot be made under section 33-c(2). if a settlement has been duly reached between the employer and his employees and it falls under section 18 (2) or (3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 1995 (HC)

Sita Ram Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-18-1995

Reported in : [1996(73)FLR1692]; (1997)IIILLJ1099P& H; (1995)111PLR249

..... a stipulation in that behalf; or (bb) termination of the service of the workman as a result of the non-renewal of the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned on its expiry or of such contract being terminated under a stipulation in behalf contained therein ; or (c) termination of the services of a workman on the ground of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //