Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2002 Page 2 of about 25 results (0.032 seconds)

Aug 06 2002 (HC)

Smt. Krishna Rani Vs. Ram Kishan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR88

..... to the condition to the grant of the permission by the competent authority. the petitioners having expressly admitted that the respondents have refused to abide by the terms of the contract, they should have asked for the relief of specific performance in the original suit itself. having allowed the period of seven years elapsed from the date of filing of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

Kata Singh Vs. Jaswant Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Reported in : (2003)134PLR90

..... . no.155 nor there is any mention that from rect. no.155 any land measuring 9 kanals shall be transferred in favour of the plaintiff. section 29 of the indian contract act lays down that all agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void and illustration (a) 6f the above section is very .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2002 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hari Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-22-2002

Reported in : 2004ACJ194

..... entitled to recover any such sum from the insured if the insurer was not otherwise liable to pay such sum to the insured by virtue of the conditions of the contract of insurance indicated by the policy. 22. to repeat, the effect of the above provisions is this: when a valid insurance policy has been issued in respect of a vehicle .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Panipat Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Reported in : [2002]256ITR371(P& H)

jawahar lal gupta, j. 1. the assessee is a co-operative society. it is running a sugar mill and a distillery. it filed its returns of income for the assessment years 1976-77 to 1979-80. it claimed deduction of certain amounts of money on account of supply of pesticides to sugarcane growers at a concessional rate. the assessing officer did not accept the claim of the society on the ground that 'the expenses were not directly and intimately connected with the business of the assessee-society. the assessee-society had no legal liability to supply pesticides at reduced rates to its own members as a gratuitous act...' the assessee challenged the orders passed in respect of the four assessment years by filing appeals. the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) rejected the assessee's claim. the assessee appealed to the tribunal. the claim was accepted. 2. aggrieved by the order of the tribunal, the revenue filed a petition under section 256(1) of the income-tax act, 1961. the tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this court : 'whether the tribunal was right in holding that the expenditure debited to the profit and loss account incurred on the sale of pesticides to its members by the assessee-society is of revenue nature ?' 3. admittedly, the assessee utilised sugarcane for production of sugar. it has an interest in the growth of sugarcane so that the requisite quantity is available and the yield of sugar is good. thus, it provides pesticides at a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2002 (HC)

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Through Its Regional Manager Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Reported in : II(2003)ACC677; 2003ACJ1454; (2003)133PLR783

..... insurance which stipulates to pay compensation for the death of the insured person himself cannot be said to be a contract of indemnity. if the owner of the vehicle, who has the benefit of indemnity is himself not covered by the policy, his representatives unless he be an employee covered by the first proviso to section 5(1)(b) is in no better ..... is to be compensated. their lordships of the karnataka high court held that owner of the karnataka high court held that owner of the vehicle who has the benefit of indemnity is himself not covered and his representative is in no better position unless he be an employee covered by the first proviso of section 85(1)(b) of the act ..... .e. his father. in that case, the son of the owner of the goods vehicle was accompanying the goods and not as an employee. it was observed that basically a contract of motor insurance seeks to indemnify the owner of the vehicle against liability arising out of claims of third parties arising against the insured owner out of the use of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2002 (HC)

Harjit Singh Vs. Daya Ram Sat Narain

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-11-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR579

..... of his residential or scheduled building for his own occupation. the right is given to the landlord notwithstanding any other provision in the act or any other law or any contract to the contrary, to recover immediately the possession of such residential building. if such residential building is let out in parts, the landlord is given the option to recover immediately ..... the date of such application to such specified landlord, notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this act or in any other law for the time being in force or in any contract (whether expressed or implied, custom or usage to the contrary, a right to recover immediately the possession of such residential building or scheduled building or any part or parts of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2002 (HC)

Vijay Mahajan, President Nagar Council, Dina Nagar Vs. State of Punjab ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-2002

Reported in : AIR2002P& H190

..... allotted and that duty was cast on the executive officer who alone under the punjab municipal (executive officer) act, 1931 (for short 1931 act) had the power to execute the contracts on behalf of the council and execute sale deeds after verifying the facts in each case. learned counsel on behalf of the respondents as also those representing the intervenors, urged ..... , senior advocate. the executive power of the council for the purpose of carrying on its administration vests in the executive officer and under section 6 of the 1931 act, every contract to be entered into by the council has to be executed on its behalf by the said officer. it is the executive officer who is required to verify the facts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2002 (HC)

Sidhu Roadlines Regd. and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-02-2002

Reported in : (2003)134PLR280

..... the petitioners and the appellants have not discharged the burden of proving that the classification is unreasonable, we hold that the levy, of an enhanced rate of vehicle tax on contract carriages was not hit by article 14'reference can also be made to the observations of the supreme court in s.k. dutta, ito v. lawrence singh ingty, (1968) 68 ..... the government, in the exercise of its power to tax, made a classification between stage carriages on the one hand and contract carriages on the other and fixed a higher rate of tax on the latter, the presumption is that the government made that classification on the basis of its information that ..... certain goods or persons may not result in its invalidity....'in g.k. krishan's case (supra) also, one of the grounds for challenging the imposition of enhanced tax on contract carriages was that similar tax had not been imposed on stage carriages. this contention was negatived by the apex court. in para-39, it was observed as under;-'..... therefore, when ..... contract carriages are using the roads more than the stage carriages because they are running more miles. therefore, this court has to assume, in the absence of any materials placed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2002 (HC)

Daljit Singh Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-31-2002

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(P& H)229

..... income-tax authorities'. this clearly shows that the possession handed over was merely permissive possession and could not be equated with handing over the possession in part-performance of the contract of the nature referred to in section 53a of the transfer of property act, 1882. from clause 5, it was evident that the possession of the petitioner was conditional on ..... -emptive purchase nor granted the no objection certificate. according to the appropriate authority, possession of the property had already been handed over to the transferee in part-performance of the contract and, as such, the letter and intent of the provisions of chapter xx-c of the act had been violated. the high court, following its earlier decision in the case ..... and that the agreement to see was not capable of being made certain and was void as per section 29 of the indian contract act, the appropriate authority had found that the agreement to sell was a contingent contract depending upon the orders of the competent authority under the urban land ceiling act and thus the appropriate authority took objections with regard .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2002 (HC)

Girnari Devi and ors. Vs. Gopal Dass and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-31-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR136

..... if such matters exceed the subject-matter of the suit. the relationship of counsel and his party or the recognised agent and his principal is a matter for contract; and with the freedom of contract generally, the legislature does not interfere except when warranted by public policy and the legislative intent is expressly made manifest. there is no such declaration of policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //