Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2006 Page 2 of about 20 results (0.026 seconds)

Nov 22 2006 (HC)

Xcell Automation Vs. Government of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-22-2006

Reported in : (2007)146PLR685; (2007)5VST308(P& H)

..... trade or commerce, the liability to tax depends upon the situs of the sale. as in most of these cases the movement of the goods would be pursuant to the contract of sale or purchase, the situs would be outside the state because of which the goods would suffer central sales tax or the state sales tax in the exporting state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2006 (HC)

Bhandari General Store and ors. Vs. Makhan Singh Grewal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR167

..... of his residential or scheduled building for his own occupation. the right is given to the landlord notwithstanding any other provision in the act or any other law or any contract to the contrary, to recover immediately the possession of such residential building. if such residential building is let out in parts, the landlord is given the option to recover immediately .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2006 (HC)

Mahalakshmi Spinners Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Reported in : 2007CriLJ429

..... , 2003.2. as per the case of the prosecution, petitioner m/s. mahalakshmi spinners limited, panipat was having large supply electricity connection bearing a/c. no. ls-67 with sanctioned contract demand of 898 kva with uttar haryana bijli vitran nigarn limited (for short 'uhbvn'). on 24-1-2006 a raiding party of uhbvn checked the premises of the petitioner. during .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2006 (HC)

Ram Kumar and ors. Vs. Rattan Parkash and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-21-2006

Reported in : (2006)144PLR123

..... performance. the doctrine of comparative hardship has been thus statutorily recognised in india. however, mere inadequacy of consideration or the mere fact that the contract is onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not constitute an unfair advantage to the plaintiff over the defendant or unforeseeable hardship on ..... the court is not arbitrary but sound and reasonable, guided by judicial principles and capable of correction by a court of appeal. performance of the contract involving some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee while non-performance involving no such hardship on the plaintiff, is one of the circumstances ..... have maintained icy silence to the plaintiffs protest made to them in writing that he was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and they should desist from executing the sale-deed in respect of their house at meham in favour of any third person. xxx xxx xxx ..... p-2 in favour of the plaintiff. it, therefore, cannot be said that defendants 1 to 3 had no time and opportunity to establish their contract with defendants 4 to 6 at the time they agreed to execute ex. p-2 in plaintiffs favour. the silence maintained by the defendants from ..... held to be bona fide purchaser for valueable consideration without notice of the earlier agreement, ex.p-2. accordingly, a decree for specific performance of contract of sale, ex, p-2, was passed in favour of the plaintiff-respondent no. 1 and against the defendant-respondent nos. l to 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2006 (HC)

Shri Banke Bihari Bricks Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-26-2006

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ950P& H; (2006)144PLR618

..... under:lt is requested that i was working to construct the chimney with the above said brick owner. i worked there from 12.9.1998 to 25.11.1998. my contract was for rs. 1,50,000/-, out of which owner has paid only rs. 79,190/- to me.i may kindly be made a sum of rs. 70,810/0 ..... . to redress their grievance, private respondents were required to file a civil suit and the authority under the act is not appropriate forum for adjudication of matters pertaining to works contract.10. further, the grouse of the petitioner is that the applications filed by the private respondents under section 20(2) of the act were time barred as the same had ..... powers under the act, alleging therein that he had worked with the petitioner-firm from 12.9.1998 to 25.11.1998. he was paid rs. 79,190/- whereas his contract with the petitioner-firm was for rs. 1,50,000/-. thus, he prayed for payment of rs. 70,810/- on account of less wages paid as also the compensation to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2006 (HC)

Food Corporation of India and anr. Vs. Amardeep and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR101; 2006(3)SLJ368(P& H)

..... prominently typed under the signatures of the applicant 'srm reserves the right to withhold 20% of the amount from the bills of the htc for any financial liabilities under the contract. the amount so deducted will only be refunded/adjusted when htc produces proof for fulfilling contractual obligations as stipulated in different labour acts.' this terms has of course been added ..... the basis of aforesaid assertions plaintiff-respondent has claimed that no deduction to the tune of 20% of the amount from the bill submitted by him after execution of the contract in respect of employees state provident fund scheme was legally permissible without his consent. it was also pleaded that there is no agreement between the parties for the deduction of ..... handling and transportation of food grains at food storage depot bhucho mandi on 13.1.1990. he commenced the business on 19.1.1990. according to the terms of the contract the plaintiff-respondent was to supply labour to the defendant-petitioners at a short notice for loading and unloading besides labour for transportation of food grains and its allied material ..... tender whose tender was accepted by the corporation was required immediately to obtain a license from the prescribed licensing authority in terms of contract labour (r&a;) rules, 1971 before entering upon any work under the contract. my attention has been invited to clause vii(f) of the copy of tender each page whereof is signed by the applicant. at page 8 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2006 (HC)

Shiv Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-06-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR706

..... and had not completed 18 years of age, she was a child within the meaning of child marriage restraint act, 1929. deepak accused who was 24 years of age, had contracted marriage with the child. he was liable for offence under section 4 of child marriage restraint act, 1929 (for short 'the act'). the other accused who had conducted or directed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2006 (HC)

Charanjit Singh Mann Vs. Neelam Mann

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

Reported in : AIR2006P& H201; (2006)143PLR851

..... june 2001; he left ambala cantt. on 8.6.2001 for delhi for his onward journey to mumbai to sort out his programme to visit singapore and to sign a contract with the employer at mumbai and he left india by air india flight no.so407 on 13.6.2001; he was not present at both the addresses i.e. ambala .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2006 (HC)

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Avon Cycles Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-20-2006

Reported in : 2007(208)ELT492(P& H); 2007[5]STR258

..... act is invokable?2. the revenue raised demand of duty in regard to steel structures and part thereof got fabricated by the assessee on job work, in terms of the contracts. demand was raised beyond the period of limitation specified under section 11a of the act, though within the extended period of limitation, applicable in a circumstance where the assessee is ..... guilty of wilful suppression of facts with an intent to evade payment of duty.3. the assessee claimed that in the process of execution of civil contract, manufacture of excisable goods was not involved.4. the claim of the assessee was rejected. though it was noted that in execution of civil ..... contract, manufacture of excisable goods may not be involved, a case for invoking extended period of limitation was held to have been made out.5. the tribunal accepted the claim of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2006 (HC)

Chanchal Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Reported in : (2006)144PLR315

..... the above or any other rule in this sub-section shall also be deemed to include such putative parents (or surviving parents as the case may be) as had not contracted a lawful marriage but were living as husband and wife at the time of or got lawfully married subsequent to the conception of deceased member of the forces.5. it .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //