Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2009 Page 3 of about 29 results (0.026 seconds)

Jan 09 2009 (HC)

Ram Sanjeevan and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-09-2009

Reported in : (2009)IILLJ630P& H

..... employer may, in accordance with standing orders applicable to a workman concerned in such dispute or, where there are no such standing orders, in accordance with the terms of the contract, whether express or implied, between him and the workman:(a) alter, in regard to any matter not connected with the dispute, the conditions of service applicable to that workman immediately ..... 2 deals with cases where the employer takes action in accordance with the standing orders applicable to the workman and in their absence, in accordance with the' terms of the contract between them but in that situation also the statute provides that in case the workman has been discharged or dismissed, he has to be paid wages for one month and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2009 (HC)

Dharam Paul Aggarwal and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Reported in : (2009)156PLR231

..... . section 2(22) of the esi act defines 'wages', which is reproduced as under:'wages' means all remuneration paid or payable in cash to an employee, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled and includes any payment to an employee in respect of any period of authorised leave, lock-out, strike which is not illegal or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2009 (HC)

icici Bank Ltd. Vs. Saurav Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-05-2009

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas429(P& H)

..... petitioner-bank can proceed with the recovery suit before a civil court and prove that it has always performed and/or had been willing to perform its part of the contract under the isda agreement and breach, if any, has been committed by the respondent-company only.14. in icici bank ltd. v. sundaram multi pap ltd. co. petition no. 248 ..... contractual obligation and self responsible for suffering the financial loss, if any. the letter demanded cancellation of the deal 'on priority basis'. could the respondent-company wriggle out of the contract and cancel it or whether there existed valid grounds like the alleged breach of terms and conditions of the agreement by the petitioner-bank, is yet another set of contentious ..... specified information to be given to the customers and in the event of any misrepresentation or non-supply of the specified information, the parties had a right to terminate the contract but the bank failed to disclose the true risk factors; (iv) the isda agreement was procured through misrepresentation and by concealing the material facts and the bank failed to keep ..... an international swaps and derivatives association (for short 'isda') master agreement along with schedule thereto with the respondent-company on july 17, 2005, for the purpose of transacting in forward contracts and other derivative transactions from time to time. the respondent-company entered into a full currency swap deal for an underlying amount of rs. 6.40 crores and the currency .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (HC)

Raghbir Singh and ors. Vs. Sikri Multiplex Cinema P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas497(P& H); [2009]93SCL188(Punj& Har)

..... of undue influence, misrepresentation, forgery and coercion. the allegation of the father was that the second respondent had threatened to kill him and other members of the family through a contract killer on march 27, 2004, which was a subject of complaint under fir no. 54 dated april 10, 2004 at p.s. sarabha nagar, ludhiana. when the second respondent was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2009 (HC)

Hardev Singh and anr. Vs. Housing Board Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-13-2009

Reported in : (2009)156PLR128

..... the conditions in the allotment letter. in such a situation, it is not open to the appellants, who are subsequent purchasers, to raise objection against any condition incorporated in the contract agreement. it was prayed that writ petition be dismissed.5. after hearing counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that the present writ petition bound to fail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2009 (HC)

Sagar Singh Slathia Vs. Surinder Pal Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-2009

Reported in : (2009)3PLR610

..... the contentions of the written statements. the written statement itself conceded the execution of the agreement but after disputing the plaintiffs readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract, the defendant had stated that if the plaintiff would be prepared to act as per the terms of document and if the balance of the sale consideration had been paid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2009 (HC)

Lallu Vs. Nirdosh Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-2009

Reported in : (2009)156PLR242

..... injunction was filed.3. during the pendency of suit, an. application for amendment of the plaintiff, was filed, by the plaintiff/applicant, for incorporating the relief, of specific performance of contract/agreement to sell dated 31.03.1994 and, in the alternative, for recovery of the amount with interest.4. the application for amendment was opposed by the defendant/respondent, on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2009 (HC)

Baldev Singh Vs. Kulbir Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-23-2009

Reported in : (2010)157PLR124

..... was held that adverse possession implies that it commenced in wrong and is maintained against right. when the commencement and continuance of possession is legal and proper, referable to a contract, it cannot be said to be adverse.8. learned counsel has next placed reliance on a decision of the apex court in dr. mahesh chand sharma v. raj kumari sharma .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2009 (HC)

Gurmit Kaur Vs. Buta Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-11-2009

Reported in : (2010)157PLR132

vinod k. sharma, j.1. this application under section 24 of the hindu marriage act has been moved by the applicant-appellant, for grant of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses.2. it has been averred in the application, that the respondent-husband is earning a sum of rs. 12,000/- (rupees twelve thousand only) per month, and in addition has sufficient bank balance from which he is earning interest, therefore, his monthly income is more than rs. 15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand only) per month.3. reply to the application has been filed, wherein preliminary objection has been taken, that the present application, under section 24 of the hindu marriage act is not maintainable, as at the time of marriage, the applicant-appellant had a living spouse, therefore, the marriage between the parties was null and void, therefore, the applicant appellant could not be treated to be a wife to be entitled to maintenance under section 24. it is also pleaded in the reply, that the respondent husband stands retired on 31.12.2004, and is getting a monthly pension of rs. 5,500/- (rupees five thousand five hundred only). it has also been pleaded, that he has to look after big family, which consists of his five children and one widow sister. however, the factum that the respondent is getting income by interest from the bank, has not been denied. the stand taken in the reply is, that the applicant-appellant is getting pension of rs. 4,000/- (rupees four thousand only) per month from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //