Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2014 Page 8 of about 85 results (0.287 seconds)

Feb 17 2014 (HC)

Date of Decision: 17.02.2014 Vs. Union of India and Another ….Respon ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-17-2014

..... cases. xx xx category b death or disability due to causes which are accepted as attributable to or aggravated by military service as determined by the competent medical authorities. diseases contracted because of continued exposure to a hostile work environment, subject to extreme weather conditions or occupational hazards resulting in death or disability would be examples. xx xx category d death .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2014 (HC)

M/S Yamuna Fabricators Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-2014

..... the necessary corrective actions have been taken. in any case, it does not validate the case of the petitioner nor gives any advantage to him. the time period of the contract is also getting over in april, 2014. in view of the aforesaid position, we are of the view that no further direction is required to be given. the writ petition ..... mention of the same in their minutes. the fact that this was not brought out in the minutes does not make any material difference to the decision to award the contract to m/s jamuna industries. nor has the decision caused any loss to the railways. therefore, i am of the considered view that recorded warning . will suffice in the case ..... written in words in violation of general conditions of contract para 4 & 10 and the issue waas not deliberated in the tender committee minutes. (iv) in spite of the shortcomings in both the offers as discussed above, the offer of ..... offer of m/s jamuna industries there were over writings/ alteration on the schedule of rates page which were not attested by the firm in violation of general conditions of contracts para 7 & 9 and this issue was not deliberated in the tender committee minutes. (iii) in the offer of m/s jamuna industries the rate and total amount were not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. I.P.S.Kohli Advocate Vs. Sagar Deswal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-09-2014

..... it to the period of 18 months.23. this reasoning needs to be re-emphasized in the light of the fact that marriage under the hindu law is not a contract simplicitor. once section13b(2) stands as a valid piece of legislation on the statute book, it needs to be interpreted on its plain language and without any variation in as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

..... undertaken to pay the amount of un-earned increase with liberty to challenge such amount in appropriate proceedings. therefore, the applicant cannot be permitted to wriggle out of the concluded contract by way of the present application. in view of the above, we do not find any ground to allow the present application. the same is dismissed. the applicant may avail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

..... undertaken to pay the amount of un-earned increase with liberty to challenge such amount in appropriate proceedings. therefore, the applicant cannot be permitted to wriggle out of the concluded contract by way of the present application. in view of the above, we do not find any ground to allow the present application. the same is dismissed. the applicant may avail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate With Vs. Hem Raj and Others …respond ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

..... undertaken to pay the amount of un-earned increase with liberty to challenge such amount in appropriate proceedings. therefore, the applicant cannot be permitted to wriggle out of the concluded contract by way of the present application. in view of the above, we do not find any ground to allow the present application. the same is dismissed. the applicant may avail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2014 (HC)

M/S Hitesh Khanna Associates Vs. Balbir Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

..... prayer of the plaintiff and i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh civil revision no.460 of 2014 -2- argued that there was no privity of contract between the petitioner firm and defendant nos.1 to 3. the civil court of ms. aarti singh, civil judge, bilaspur, has dismissed the civil suits filed by the plaintiff firm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

ish Anand Vs. Raj Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2014

in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh1 civil revision no.4613 of 2010 (o&m) ish anand ....petitioner versus raj kumar ...respondent 2) civil revision no.4614 of 2010 (o&m) ish anand ....petitioner versus vijay kumar ...respondent 3) civil revision no.4615 of 2010 (o&m) ish anand ....petitioner versus anil kumar ...respondent 4) civil revision no.4616 of 2010 (o&m) ish anand ....petitioner versus ajay kumar ...respondent 5) civil revision no.4617 of 2010 ish anand ....petitioner versus ashwani loomba ...respondent 6) civil revision no.4618 of 2010 ish anand ....petitioner versus singh daljit 2014.03.03 10:53 i attest to the accuracy of this document civil revision no.4613 of 2010 (o&m) -2- naresh dhingra ...respondent 7) civil revision no.4619 of 2010 ish anand ....petitioner versus anil kumar ...respondent date of decision : 20.2.2014 coram : hon'ble mr.justice mahesh grover present: mr.g.c.shahpuri, advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions. mr.r.k.sharma, advocate for the respondents in all the petitions....mahesh grover.j.by this order i shall dispose of civil revision nos.4613 to 4619 of 2010 as they involve commonality of facts and law. the petitioner, who is landlord, sought the eviction of respondents on the grounds of non-payment of rent and personal necessity. both the learned rent controller and the appellate court non-suited him. before this court the only ground urged is regarding personal necessity which has been negated by the courts below .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2014 (HC)

Cadila Healthcare Limited Vs. the State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-03-2014

..... provided for deferment of payment clause as per clause 19 and for giving of free medicines as per clause 18. there is also a provision for validity of the rate contract beyond the period of two years by mutual consent of both the parties. ex-facie, we find nothing irregular with the aforesaid clauses, nor can they be said to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2014 (HC)

Satinder Sharma and Another Vs. Nirmal Kumar and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-05-2014

..... are enunciated in section 55 of the transfer of property act. though under the provisions of indian contrat act, 1872 the consent is an essential pre- requisite of a concluded contract where in elements of coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation and mistake should not be embedded and the term fraud . has been defined in section 17 of the indian ..... contract act, 1872 as some thing of a connivance with intent to deceive another party, which carries the suggestion as a fact of that which is not true by one who .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //