Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2014 Page 9 of about 85 results (0.166 seconds)

Aug 13 2014 (HC)

Present: Shri Ashok Aggarwal Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-13-2014

..... court in chaman lal singhal v. haryana urban development authority, (2009).scc369 it was held that since the appellant has failed to comply with the conditions, no binding and concluded contract came into force as the letter of allotment was to be issued only on compliance of the conditions mentioned in the dalbir singh201408.21 11:40 i attest to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2014 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Rana and Others Vs. Food Corporation of India and Other ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-2014

..... became the reason for filing a suit for recovery. interestingly, the petitioners denied everything against them in the civil suit and even took up a stand that there was no contract between petitioner no.1 and the food corporation of india and also questioned the identity of petitioner no.1 being a person who singh daljit 2014.01.20 10:27 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2014 (HC)

Sanjay @ Sanjeev and Another Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited K ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-13-2014

..... -section (4) with the proviso thereunder and sub-section (5) which are intended to cover specified contingencies mentioned therein to enable the insurer to recover the amount paid under the contract of insurance on behalf of the insured can be taken recours.to by the tribunal and be extended to claims and defences of the insurer against the insured by relegating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Surinder Mohan Sharma Advocate Vs. Sardara Ram and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-28-2014

..... rs.10,000/- was paid by the plaintiff to defendant no.1 towards agreement to sell. the plaintiff has always been ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, but defendant no.1 adopted delaying tactics. subsequently, last date for kumar virender 2014.03.11 12:10 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document rs.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2014 (HC)

Present:- Shri Chetan Mittal Senior Advocate with Vs. Jai Pal Singh Si ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

c.o.c.p. no.836 of 2007 -1- in the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh. c.o.c.p. no.836 of 2007 (o&m) date of order :20. 3.2014 ashwani kumar bansal and another petitioners versus jai pal singh sibia and another respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice mahesh grover present:- shri chetan mittal, senior advocate with shri kunal mulwani, advocate for the petitioners. shri jai pal singh sibia, respondent no.1 in person with shri anupam gupta, senior advocate with shri bhavnik mehta, advocate. shri ashok aggarwal, senior advocate with shri mukul aggarwal, advocate for respondent no.2. mahesh grover, j.the facts of this case would reveal the devious manner contrived by the present contemner namely jai pal singh sibia son of late jagjit singh sibia in collusion with the other contemner namely ajai kumar jain not only to deprive the present petitioners of the possessory rights, but also to send them into throes of protracted litigation. the present petitioners namely ashwani kumar bansal and anil dass ghanshyam 2014.03.20 15:21 i am the author of this document high court chandigarh c.o.c.p. no.836 of 2007 -2- kumar bansal are the owners of s.c.o. no.321-322, sector 35-b, chandigarh. for the purpose of reference of this case, it would be just and appropriate to describe both these premises separately as s.c.o. no.321 and 322 as the respondent/contemners have tried to play upon this confusion to successfully throw the factual matrix off tangent. jagjit singh sibia, the father .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //