Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 1 of about 40 results (0.023 seconds)

Jan 14 2015 (HC)

Muni Choudhary and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

..... in the year 1998 but without considering their candidature for the purpose of regularization straightaway their services were terminated on the ground that appointments were made by the agency on contract basis. learned counsel for the petitioners argued that when a conscious decision was taken for framing rules and in the rules, it is specifically provided that all those persons who ..... of child and women development was assigned to district women development agency and the said agency issued an advertisement (annex.2) for providing appointment on the post of supervisor on contract basis to the petitioners. all the petitioners except babu singh chouhan and hanumana ram were appointed {15} s.b. civil writ petition no.3855/2009 smt.munni choudhary & ors. vs ..... on contractual basis for a consolidated remuneration. thus it is evident that the services of the petitioners came to an automatic end in the year 2002 with the expiry of contract and they have no right to remain in services of the respondents thereafter. a further objection has been raised that the orders in question came to be passed way-back .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2014 (HC)

M/S. K.B. Co-op. Art Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... .e., in dresser rand s.a. s case (supra), relates to foreign awards (recognition and enforcement) act (no.45 of 1961) and not a general contract under the indian contract act or a contract entered into by the state or its instrumentality under article 299 of the constitution. therefore, in the backdrop of the facts and circumstances of the instant case ..... not have, been convicted of any criminal offence related to their professional conduct or the making of false statements or misrepresentations as to their qualifications to enter into a procurement contract within a [33]. period of three years preceding the commencement of the procurement process, or not have been otherwise disqualified pursuant to debarment proceedings; (e) not have a ..... corporation ltd.) on the other hand contended that no arbitration agreement had been executed between the parties and the correspondence between the parties did not bring about any enforceable contract between the parties, because the fundamental conditions of the terms of the bargain were neither agreed upon nor fulfilled by the parties. this court accepted the contention by ..... , relying on same, the respondent has pleaded that rejection of technical bid of the petitioner was a just decision warranting no interference. highlighting its credentials to win the contract, fourth respondent has pleaded in the return that entire process was transparent and fair and on objective evaluation of technical bid it has been declared qualified for opening of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2015 (HC)

Ram Singh and Ors Vs. Bhikam Chand and Ors

Court : Rajasthan - Jodhpur

sbc first appeal no.469/2009 ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. judgment dt:28. 1/2015 1/35 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. s.b.civil first appeal no.469/2009 date of judgment :28. h january, 2015 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari mr.jitendra chopra, for the appellant-defendants mr. suresh shrimali, ]. mr.sundeep bhandawat,]. for the respondent-plaintiffs. mr.ashok patel, ]. by the court: reportable1 the defendants ram singh s/o ghasi ram & ors have filed the present first appeal under section 96 cpc against bhikam chand s/o ram jeevan & anr. being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12/8/2009 passed learned addl. district judge (fast track) no.3, jodhpur in a suit for specific performance being civil suit no.603/2004 (351/2004) bhikam chand & arun kumar vs. ram singh s/o ghasi ram & ors.2. the said suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiffs bhikam chand & ors. on 2/11/2004 in respect of agriculture land belonging to ghasi ram, father of the present appellant-defendant ram singh, ad-measuring 28 bighas 19 biswas situated of khasra no.821, 822, 823, 824, 827 & 827/1 in village baga, tehsil & district sbc first appeal no.469/2009 ram singh & ors. vs. bhikam chand & ors. judgment dt:28. 1/2015 2/35 jodhpur, which was agreed to be sold to the plaintiffs under the agreement to sell dated 28/10/1989 at the rate of rs.51,000/- per bigha and this agreement dated 28/10/1989 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Virendra Ragwani Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. similarly, a temporary employee could not ..... the duty to ensure a proper appointment procedure through the public service commission or otherwise as per the rules adopted and to permit these irregular appointees or those appointed on contract or on daily wages, to continue year after year, thus, keeping out those who are qualified to apply for the post concerned and depriving them of an opportunity to compete ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (5)(b) whether substitution of existing proviso to rule 23 is not ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (b) whether in view of the existing rule 273 in which written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Archana Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. similarly, a temporary employee could not ..... the duty to ensure a proper appointment procedure through the public service commission or otherwise as per the rules adopted and to permit these irregular appointees or those appointed on contract or on daily wages, to continue year after year, thus, keeping out those who are qualified to apply for the post concerned and depriving them of an opportunity to compete ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (5)(b) whether substitution of existing proviso to rule 23 is not ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (b) whether in view of the existing rule 273 in which written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Ranveer Deharu Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. similarly, a temporary employee could not ..... the duty to ensure a proper appointment procedure through the public service commission or otherwise as per the rules adopted and to permit these irregular appointees or those appointed on contract or on daily wages, to continue year after year, thus, keeping out those who are qualified to apply for the post concerned and depriving them of an opportunity to compete ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (5)(b) whether substitution of existing proviso to rule 23 is not ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (b) whether in view of the existing rule 273 in which written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

State and ors Vs. Archana

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. similarly, a temporary employee could not ..... the duty to ensure a proper appointment procedure through the public service commission or otherwise as per the rules adopted and to permit these irregular appointees or those appointed on contract or on daily wages, to continue year after year, thus, keeping out those who are qualified to apply for the post concerned and depriving them of an opportunity to compete ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (5)(b) whether substitution of existing proviso to rule 23 is not ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (b) whether in view of the existing rule 273 in which written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2013 (HC)

Nagendra Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... among qualified persons, the same would not confer any right on the appointee. if it is a contractual appointment, the appointment comes to an end at the end of the contract, if it were an engagement or appointment on daily wages or casual basis, the same would come to an end when it is discontinued. similarly, a temporary employee could not ..... the duty to ensure a proper appointment procedure through the public service commission or otherwise as per the rules adopted and to permit these irregular appointees or those appointed on contract or on daily wages, to continue year after year, thus, keeping out those who are qualified to apply for the post concerned and depriving them of an opportunity to compete ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (5)(b) whether substitution of existing proviso to rule 23 is not ..... under the said proviso the state government granted weightage of 10 marks for the experience of each year, up to three years, to the employees engaged on ad hoc/temporary/contract basis in the various schemes or projects of the rural development department and deserves to be declared unconstitutional? (b) whether in view of the existing rule 273 in which written .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2013 (HC)

Tilok Singh and ors Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... petitions preferred by the petitioners assailing their termination from service, claiming continuance/re-employment as vidhyarthi mitra and against the insistence of the government for execution of the fresh contract, are dismissed. the vidhyarthi mitra scheme introduced by the state government for engagement of 'vidhyarthi mitra' on contractual basis on fixed honorarium against the posts of teachers gr ..... , appointment may be made by the appointing authority on urgent temporary basis for a period not exceeding six months provided that such person shall be appointed only on contract basis with prior approval of the district establishment committee in case of panchayats and approval of the state government in case of panchayat samiti/zila parishad. besides, as ..... to be issued to the respondents to continue the petitioners in service till the availability of regularly selected candidates and further, not to insist for execution of the fresh contract from time to time. learned counsel submitted that the persons whose services were terminated, notwithstanding the availability of vacant posts are entitled to be re-employed till the ..... principle of 'last come first go'.13. indisputably, the question with regard to legality of the scheme framed by the state government for engagement of vidhyarthi mitra on contract basis against the sanctioned post of teachers in the different services/cadres did not come for consideration of this court in the matters already decided as aforesaid. as noticed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2013 (HC)

Chittorgarh Zila Sah. B.V. Bank Ltd Vs. Anil Kumar Shishodia and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... from the society, which aspect has not been adverted to by the arbitrator or by the tribunal. the learned counsel has further contended that merely because of existence of a contract, disqualification is not attached in the matter of elections and has referred to the decisions in ram padarath mahto versus mishri sinha & anr.: air1961sc480 shrikant versus vasantrao & ors.: (2006) 2 ..... ) no.830/2012. narayan singh versus anil kumar shishodia (alongwith one connected matter) // 11 // countenanced by this court. admittedly, the petitioner had no subsisting direct or indirect inters.in any contract or other transaction entered into with the bank, as on the date of filing the nomination papers or declaration of result, and therefore, the petitioner cannot be said to have ..... contention of the learned counsel is accepted then any person acquiring the membership of the society, who had any direct or indirect interest at any point of time in the contract made or the transaction entered into with the respondent-bank even prior to acquiring the membership shall also not be eligible to contest the election as member of the management ..... case of his having any direct or indirect interest in the transaction of loan between the borrower and the bank. according to the writ-petitioner, there was no privity of contract in respect of those transactions between the bank and his business ventures and, therefore, question of his disqualification did not arise. it was also submitted that there was no averment .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //