Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.017 seconds)

Oct 10 1962 (HC)

The Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm LaxminaraIn Harnarain

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-10-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Raj162

..... delivery of the goods may, at the discretion of the railway company, be withheld until the person entitled in its opinion to receive them has given an indemnity to the satisfaction of the railway company'. p paid the freight. the railway receipt was endorsed by p in favour of a third party. it was ..... clearly distinguishable on facts and do not render any substantial assistance to mr. agarwal. in the first case it was held that: 'where under a contract the seller of goods is required to deliver them at the buyer's premises he fulfils his obligation if he delivers them there to a person who ..... the railway receipt to the consignee the only remedy of the endorsee being against the endorser; (3) p did not unconditionally appropriate the goods to the contract for sale but reserved the right of disposal, in so far as he obtained the railway receipt in respect of the goods in his own favour as ..... on law advanced by mr. agarwal has not been made out. no evidence has been led to show that the goods were ever unconditionally appropriated to the contract. on the other hand, the facts proved, on the record clearly negative any such appropriation. the fact that the plaintiffs consigned the goods in their own ..... of negligence and the burden of disproving negligence lies on the bailee and further this burden also lies on the railway administration in the absence of a contract to the contrary; (3) the word 'loss' appearing in section 72 of the indian railways act must be given the wider meaning so as to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1962 (HC)

Chhinga Ram and anr. Vs. Nihalsingh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-17-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Raj100

..... case, i do not consider it necessary to give any finding on the other contention raised by learned counsel for the plaintiffs on the strength of section 65 of the contract act.19. the position, therefore, to which we come is that the decision of the courts below on issue no. 3 cannot be sustained and it must be set aside ..... case was invalid and therefore inadmissible in evidence, it embodies a transaction which must be held to have been discovered as void within the meaning of section 65 of the contract act and it must, therefore, be held that the person who received any advantage under such agreement was bound to restore it, or to make compensation for it to the ..... harnath kuar v. indar bahadur, air 1922 pc 403. the submission of leained counsel on the basis of these authorities is that section 65 of the contract act not only applies to agreements and contracts but also to transfer of property and therefore where a mortgage is found invalid, a mortgagee can recover the mortgage money under section 65 if he prays .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1962 (HC)

State Vs. Shrinath

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-30-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Raj14; 1963CriLJ218

..... wilfully suffering any other person so to do in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied which he has made touching the discharge of such trust,(iii) the entrustment should be in his capacity of a public servant, or in the way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1962 (HC)

The State Vs. Banshilal Luhadia and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-31-1962

Reported in : AIR1962Raj250

..... meaning of section 33 knowingly acquired or continued to hold without permission in writing of the commissioner, directly or indirectly or by a partner, any share or interest in any contract or employment with, by or on behalf of the board, or(c) has knowingly acted as a member in a matter other than a matter referred to in clause (d .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1962 (HC)

Tilkayat Govindlalji and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-31-1962

Reported in : AIR1962Raj196

bhandari, j.1. the three writ petitions referred to above seek to challenge the vires of the nathdwara temple act (act no. 13 of 1959) (hereinafter called 'the act') passed by the rajasthan state legislature. this act received the assent of the president on the 28th of march, 1959.2. writ petition no. 90 of 1959, has been filed by shri tilkayat govindlalji maharaj of nathdwara (hereinafter called 'the tilkayat').3. writ petition no. 310 of 1959 has been filed by triyambak lal and nine others who are the followers of the vallabh sampradaya and are hereinafter called 'the vaighnavas'.4. the third writ petition no. 420 of 1960 has been filed by goswami shri ghanshiam lal, head of the shrine of the vallabh sampradaya at kamban (district bharatpur). the respondents to all these writ petitions are the state of rajasthan and the members of the temple board constituted under the act and the executive officer of the board appointed under the act.5. before we refer to the contentions of the petitioners in these writ petitions, it is both necessary and convenient to refer to the historical background of the temple of shrinathji at nathdwara and also to the circumstances under which the impugned act was passed. this temple is of the denomination known as pushti margiya vaishnav sampradaya', more popularly known as 'vallabh sampradaya' (hereinafter for the sake of brevity called 'the sampradaya'). this sampradaya was founded by shri vallabhaharya, who, according to dr. bhandarkar, was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1962 (HC)

Lalchand and anr. Vs. Nenuram and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-25-1962

Reported in : AIR1963Raj69

..... they had solemnly agreed.. cases may arise in which the terms and conditions in the two documents are so interwoven that in order to determine the true nature of the contract entered into by the parties, both must be read together and considered part of the same transaction. such cases apart, on principle i find it difficult to accept that even .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //