Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.055 seconds)

May 12 1967 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Representing Northern Railway Vs. Firm J.P. Sharm ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-12-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj99

..... chapter x of russell on arbitration, beginning from page 158, deals with the procedure of actual submission in cases where arbitration is provided in contracts and the reference of arbitration is made out of court. to start with the parties in such cases must deposit the agreement with the arbitrator ..... and also the question whether the defendant was in fact justified in supplying materials to other parties in the territory in question after entering into contract with the plaintiff would vitiate the award.' the learned judges, however, recognised that it is no doubt true that in fit cases and in ..... senior officer of the railway itself and he was next to the general manager and as such he knew the rules and procedure regarding the contracts of porterage and handling. therefore, when no malice had been imputed to the arbitrator the award cannot be set aside. shri vyas submitted ..... judge observed that some claims were specifically reserved in the plaint and the claim put forth before the arbitrator covered the entire period of the contract and all kinds of claims. in the circumstances, according to him, it could not be said that the arbitrator had acted without jurisdiction. ..... required both the parties to submit a joint statement containing factual information and the details of the actual work done during the period of the contract. regarding this the arbitrator gave detailed directions. accordingly both the parties, submitted the joint statement under their signatures on 11-2-63. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1967 (HC)

Badriprasad Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-20-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj59

..... reference to air 1954 mad 101, but it appears to me that that case was distinguishable because it did not deal with a deposit made for the performance of a contract which was refundable only on a contingencybesides, the judgment of chagla c j. in the case of air 1960 bom 404 was not brought to the notice of the learned ..... no claim for the refund of the money on the date of the deposit in view of the arrangement which the parties had willingly made and which was really a contract governing their these facts and circumstances, when the plaintiff could not have asked for the refund of the money on the date of the deposit, or, in other ..... take the plea that it had made any entrustment of the money to the defendant, and in view of the finding of fact that the deposit was made under a contract between the parties and its refund was dependant on the contingency that the plaintiff did not export the ghee, it would be fair to conclude that the state did not ..... dholpur state for purposes of the present claim. it would therefore be fair and reasonable to conclude, as a fact, that the deposit was made and was refundable under a contract between the parties, and that the cause of action arose a few months later when the plaintiff found that it was not in a position to export the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1967 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Delhi and Rajasthan Vs. Her Highness Mahar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-03-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj129; [1967]66ITR1(Raj)

kan singh, j. 1. the following two questions have been referred to this court under section 27(1) of the wealth tax act, hereinafter to be referred as the 'act', by the income-tax appellate tribunal bombay, bench 'b' :--'(1) whether on a proper construction of the deed of settlement the assessee has any interest in the corpus of the deed of settlement? (2) whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, the right of the assessee derived under the deed of settlement is exempt from wealth-tax by virtue of the provisions of section 2(e)(iv) of the wealth-tax act?' 2. the relevant facts giving rise to this reference may be outlined as follows:--3. the assesaee is her highness maharani gavatri devi of jaipur the assessment year for which the assessment of her wealth under the act was made was the year 1959-60 and the valuation date of her assets was 31-3-1959. the assessee is the wife of his highness maharaja shri man singhji of jaipur, hereinafter to be referred as the 'maharaja'. on 9-9-53. the maharaja made a settlement in respect of certain war bonds of the face value of pound 3 lakhs carrying an interest of 3 1/2% for the benefit of his wife, the assessee, and his four sons. maharaj kumar bhawani singh, maharaj kumar jai singh, maharaj kumar prithviraj and maharaj kumar jagat singh.according to the deed of settlement the maharaja was a party of the first part and one sir harold augusts wernher baronet hereinafter to be referred as the 'trustee', was a party of the other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 1967 (HC)

Nathulal Fatehpuria Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-22-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj151

..... means the aggregate of the amount of sale prices received or receivable by a dealer in respect of the sale or supply of goods in the carrying out of any contract (omitting the portions which are not material for our present purpose) section 4 provides that no tax shall be payable under this act on the sale of any of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1967 (HC)

Mst. Bhuri Bai Vs. Mst. Champi Bai and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-16-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj139

..... inherit partially or wholly the property of their wives. there is no process providing for the forfeiture of the property inherited by a husband from a deceased wife on his contracting a re-marriage. naturally, in these changed conditions there was a strong movement for remedying the defects of the old hindu law of succession showing very scant regard for the ..... . this act, it may be mentioned, improved the condition of the hindu widow and converted the 'limited estate' into 'absolute estate'. after the promulgation of the act. mst. champi bai contracted remarriage with shri nathu ram defendant no. 2 some time either in the year 1957 or 1958. after re-marriage she made a gift of the property inherited by her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1967 (HC)

Khetmal Vs. Chhaganraj and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-29-1967

Reported in : AIR1968Raj123

..... ) any payment by the insolvent to any of his creditors; (b) any payment or delivery to the insolvent; (c) any transfer by the insolvent for valuable consideration; or (d) any contract or dealing by or with the insolvent for valuable consideration; provided that any such transaction takes place before the date of the order of adjudication, and that the person with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //