Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.019 seconds)

Mar 08 1988 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-08-1988

Reported in : AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487

..... best evidence in its possession that the municipal council, kota, had committed breach of the agreement. it also held that the plaintiff-company had not produced any bill or the contract form with its customers in order to show that what was sold to the customers was only nylon thread and not the cops and further that there was condition in ..... the contract with the customers that they will return the cops to the plaintiff-company. thus, the plaintiff-company failed to establish that it did not charge any price of the cops .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1988 (HC)

Ashok Foundry and Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-10-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)219

..... dcm's case were only with respect to the question which was raised in that petition as to whether a writ petition challenging a statutory contract is maintainable or not. the specific question that is required to be dealt within this case arose in dokal ram's case and, thus, ..... within fourteen days after the service on him by the licensee of a notice in writing in this behalf, tenders to the licensee a written contract, in a form approved by the state government duly executed and with sufficient security, binding himself to take a supply of energy for not less ..... per unit is equal to the minimum charges. the tariff is framed with the idea that the consumer will consume electricity in proportion to the contract demand. the board has denied that the rates are being increased to the extent contended by the petitioner. it is also pointed out by respondent ..... kva month of the contractdemand(b) for approved seasonal factories, themonthly minimum charges shall bereckoned at rate of rs. 75/- per kvaper year of the contract demand, or onthe highest maximum demand registeredin any month during the year which everis higher. this will not include theconsumption charges during the offseason.2. for ..... high tension part-ii as below:viii. large industrial loads:applicability: available as primary power to large industrialpower consumers and water works for publicsupply having a contract demand of above 125 kva.rate of charge:alternative-ifirst 5,00,000 kwh. per month: 18 p. per kwhnext 10,00,000 kwh. per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1988 (HC)

Hind Techno Machines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jaipur Wire Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-16-1988

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN580

..... the same in point of law. the damages claimed are remote and cannot be claimed by the respondent company in view of section 73 of the indian contract act, which gives right to a party to claim damages on the basis of difference of the market price only which the respondent company has completely ..... the goods. the petitioner company supplied the goods on 12th april, 1984, i.e. after the alleged date of supply and he supplied it at the contracted price. there is nothing on the record to prove that the prices have gone high. in this view of the matter, the question arises as to how ..... law stated above, solution to the dispute would determine the fate of the case.15. in my opinion, in view of section 55 of the indian contract act and in view of the fact that the respondent without any objection appropriated the goods to its own use and did not reserve any right to ..... promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure.effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon: if, in case of a contract voidable on account of the promisor's failure to perform his promise at the time agreed, the promise accepts performance of such promise at any time other ..... dues of the aforesaid two bills. it is also stated by the petitioner that he was ready and willing to supply the material, but the breach of contract was committed by the respondent company by not making the payment of the aforesaid bills despite repeated requests. the petitioner also pleaded that the counter-claim made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1988 (HC)

Gandhi Ramnani Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-08-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)101

..... has further drawn my attention to a single bench decision of this court in swarnjeet jain v. state of rajasthan (1981 cr lr (raj) 671). it was a case of contract of agency where the goods were supplied to the agents for sale and payment was not made, but the present case is not a case of agency. here the accused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1988 (HC)

Gopal Krishan Vs. Ram Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-09-1988

Reported in : AIR1989Raj24; 1988(2)WLN197

..... 1976) and the said definition now reads as under : --'3(vii) 'tenant' means : --(a) the person by whom or on whose account or behalf rent is, or, but for a contract express or implied would be, payable for any premises to his landlord including the person who is continuing in its possession after the termination of his tenancy otherwise than by ..... in sub-section (vii) of section 3 of the act which at the relevant time read as under : --'tenant means the person by whom rent is, or but for a contract express or implied would be payable for any premises and includes any person holding or occupying the premises as a sub-tenant or any person continuing in possession after the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1988 (HC)

Mohammad Aleem Vs. Maqsood Alam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-07-1988

Reported in : AIR1989Raj43

..... that would be defeating the decree on the allegation that it was obtained by fraud. fraud or misrepresentation renders a contract voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so obtained and it does not render the contract void. the contract continues to be valid till the aggrieved party challenges its validity. the only remedy of a person who wishes to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1988 (HC)

United Commercial Bank Vs. Jagatia Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-23-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)390

..... against the uco bank cannot be said to be frivolous or based on extraneous grounds or malafide. here, in the case, the petitioner bank has levelled allegations of breach of contract against the non-petitioner company and the non-petitioner company has alleged that it is not liable to pay any amount to the petitioner bank and the liability is yet ..... of a counter-guarantee given by the non-petitioner company on 18th july, 1985, executed a deed of surety on the back of the indemnity bond executed by the non-petitioner company. on the basis of the indemnity bond and the surety bond the non-petitioner company managed to get delivery orders from the shipping company without production of the documents relating .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //