Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.024 seconds)

Sep 11 1990 (HC)

Smt. Kishni Devi Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-11-1990

Reported in : AIR1992Raj24; 1990(2)WLN102; 1990WLN(UC)351

..... revocation published in 'rajasthan patrika' of may 16, 1987. thus the sale-deed was executed by rajesh lodha prior to the revocation of his authority to execute it. section 204, contract act runs as under:'204. the principal cannot revoke the authority given to his agent after the authority has been partly exercised, so far as regards such acts and obligations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1990 (HC)

Ratan Lal Vs. Raj. Housing Board

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-25-1990

Reported in : 1990WLN(UC)338

..... is serving the statutory corporation having force of law the petitioner has a statutory status and his employment has to be considered as a matter of status and not of contract. it is then submitted that the petitioner who had been continuously serving for such a long period, his services are required to be regularised. even assuming that he does not ..... in the office of a deputy commissioner where no post equivalent to the post of personal assistant to chairman exists. it is submitted that once the order appointing him on contract basis followed by order of termination of his service was unconditionally withdrawn and then the board resolved to regularise his services on the post of personal assistant to chairman he ..... to be posted on the post of personal assistant to the chairman or its equivalent post available. petitioner's further grievance is that he has wrongly been treated as on contract basis appointee which came to be terminated as soon as the order terminating his services were withdrawn vide order dated january 31, 1984.4. learned counsel for the petitioner shri ..... was mentioned that in partial modification of the previous order, dated 2nd september, 1982, shri ratan lal sharma is appointed as personal assistant to the chairman, rajasthan housing board on contract basis on a fixed pay of rs. 730/- per month with other facilities like d.a., h.r.a., cca. and other allowances admissible on such pay from time to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1990 (HC)

The Ganganagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Rameshwar Das Tara Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-05-1990

Reported in : AIR1992Raj14; 1991(2)WLN337

..... a person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution has found statutory recognition in sections 65 to 70, contract act. it has not been shown as to how the plaintiff is unjustly enriched. on the contrary, it is clear from the aforesaid discussions that ..... it can be inferred that the order passed by the government altering the rate at any subsequent period had automatically the effect of affecting any contract arrived at before that order was promulgated or issued irrespective of the fact whether the government made that order retrospective or not.'as such the ..... (at page 480) :--'13. i do not find any substance in these contentions of the learned counsel for the respondent. no question of frustration of contract can arise in this case because the government in its letter fixing a different price in oct., 1950, clearly mentioned that this order would have no ..... counsel for the respondents that the amounts of carnets money were not deposited the same day as required under the notice of auction and as such the contracts of sale were not complete before september 12, 1979. this argument is devoid of force. firstly, no such case has been pleaded in the ..... deliverable state at the time of auction, sale, the property in goods not pass to the defendants, on the issuance' of price control order, the contracts which took place in between the parties' on sept. 10 1979 were frustrated, the defendants were not' bound to lift the sugar purchased by them in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1990 (HC)

Kanaram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-23-1990

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN345

n.c. sharma, j.1. ramlal, real younger brother of kanaram petitioner, has filed this habeas corpus writ petition, for quashing the order of the district magistrate, ajmer, dated aug. 1, '89, whereby, the district magistrate, ajmer on being satisfied that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in the manner prejudicial to public order, it was necessary to detain him under the provisions contained in national security act, 1980 (hereinafter, for short 'the act'), ordered his detention; the order containing the grounds of detention served upon the petitioner by the district magistrate, ajmer, dated aug. 3,'89; the confirmation [ order of the state government dated aug. 10, '89; and the order dated sept. 21, '89, whereby, the state government further confirmed the detention-order of the petitioner.2. according to the petitioner, he was under arrest in the criminal case, registered in pursuance of fir no. 132/89 under sections 152 and 327, ipc. in this criminal case, the j petitioner was granted bail on july 26, '89. however, there was one more case against the petitioner, registered in pursuance of fir no. 155/89 of ps--kishangarh, under sections 392 and 394, ipc. in that case also, the petitioner was arrested on july 27, '89, at 3.30 pm. in this latter case, the petitioner was released on bail on aug. 2, '89. but, on that very date, under the detention-order dated aug. 1, '89, passed by the district magistrate, ajmer, (ann. 1), under sub-section (2) read with sub- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1990 (HC)

Bank of Baroda Vs. Nandkishore Kachhwaha

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-16-1990

Reported in : AIR1991Raj151

..... -appellant from the suit premises, which were let out for commercial purposes, created by section 14(3) of the act which provides that 'notwithstanding anything contained, in any law or contract, no suit for eviction from the premises let-out for commercial or business purposes shall lie against a tenant on the ground set forth in clause (h) of sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1990 (HC)

Devendra Nath Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-18-1990

Reported in : 1990WLN(UC)13

..... manual (volume-i) general. according to the department, it was the duty of the ex.en. to have checked the work, thrice or four times in the case where the contract was worth more than one lakh. as the petitioner did not check the work according to the rule, the prosecution of the petitioner was permitted and sanction was accorded. so .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //