Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 30 results (0.021 seconds)

Oct 07 1992 (HC)

Vijai Singh Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpn. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-07-1992

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1038Raj; 1993(1)WLC577

..... transport's case (supra). the rule was struck down by the supreme court in its land- mark decision where the court declared that any contract of service which is unconscionable, arbitrary or opposed to public policy is liable to be quashed or declared unenforceable on the ground of violation of ..... violation of section 23 of the contract act or article 14 of the constitution.10. the distinction between the government and its corporation came to be virtually obliterated in the decision ..... (1986-ii-llj-171), a new dimension has been added to the ever-growing administrative law in this country. the court declared that a contract of employment can be castigated by the court as arbitrary, unconscionable and opposed to public policy and it can be quashed on the ground of ..... 14 and 16. an argument was raised on behalf of the employer that the conditions of service of temporary employee were governed by the contract of service voluntarily entered by him and if the said terms of service contain a clause that his service was purely temporary and is liable ..... master and servant so far as state, its agencies and instrumentalities are concerned. an employee cannot be bound down by the conditions contained in the contract of employment merely because he accepts those conditions without objection or protest. an argument of similar nature was categorically rejected by the supreme court in manager .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1992 (HC)

H.U. Construction Company and anr. Vs. the State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-07-1992

Reported in : 1993(1)WLC280; 1992(2)WLN275

..... also on the tehsil head quarters.32. it was further contended that the offer made by the petitioner-association cannot be accepted because the state govt. cannot enter into a contract with its own employees and if it is accepted, that would raise number of complication. the nakedars presently posted at jodhpur may be transferred, on administrative grounds, if any ..... viz., pwd., irrigation, railway and uit etc were also asked to furnish the list of 'a' class contractors, who may be interested in participating in the auction of royally collection contract. out of the list furnished by these departments, 32 persons were sent the copies of the said notification. two persons, shri kalu ram and bachraj bhati personally obtained the copies ..... in auction or to watch the proceedings. it was submitted that in all 49 notices were issued to different persons to intimate them about the auction of the royalty collection contract. in addition to publicity through gazette notification, press publicity was also done and display of notices was made on the notice boards of tehsil, municipal council, uit. and various ..... crores or more and, therefore, the respondents should favour their own fraternity i.e. their own employees who are consistently vigilant about their honesty and working and, therefore, throwing of contract in the lap of a private person clearly demonstrates that the auction authorities have completely lost sight of the possible loss of revenue which otherwise would have been acquired by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1992 (HC)

Mst. Noor Bano Vs. Mohammed Riaz

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-12-1992

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC149; 1992(2)WLN228

..... restitution of conjugal rights was passed by the court on on 18.3.1975. all these proceedings were instituted after the second marriage had already been contracted. these proceedings were, thus, never intended to take back the first wife (petitioner) to her matrimonial home, but were instituted only in order ..... appear to have been instituted in order to save himself from the liability of payment of the maintenance allowance to the wife because mohammed riaz contracted the second marriage on 4.6.1970, while he filed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights in the court on 31.10.1970, ..... legal and social status of the subsequent wife to which she is entitled to as a legally wedded wife. the neglected wife, whose husband has contracted second marriage, is, therefore, entitled to refuse to live with the husband and can claim maintenance and the husband, who has performed the marriage ..... and claim the maintenance. it is further contended by the learned counsel for the non-petitioner that the non-petitioner (husband)was driven to contract the marriage again because the petitioner-applicant, without sufficient cause, failed to live with him and deprived him of the martial rights, but he ..... to the conclusion that the applicant was never divorced by the husband nor was she neglected or ill- treated by the husband but the husband has contracted second marriage and as she is unable to maintain herself, the learned trial court, therefore, allowed the application of the applicant (wife) mst. noor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1992 (HC)

Avashan Mandal Parijat Uch Ayavargh Sangarsh Samiti Vs. Rajasthan Hous ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-16-1992

Reported in : 1993(3)WLC391; 1992WLN(UC)253

..... the cost of construction and other charges through these writ petitions because that will require certain amount of accounting calculations and moreover, they relate to non-statutory conditions of the contract. however, sofaras the cost of the land is concerned, about that rules in the shape of the costing principles are there, which have been published vide notification dated ..... corporations : [1990]1scr818 , wherein it has been observed as follows:the state acts in its executive power under article 298 of the constitution in entering or not enteriling in contracts with individual parties. article 14 of the constitution would be applicable to those exercise of power. therefore, the action of the state organ can be checked under article 14 ..... charged from the allottees of houses of second, third and fourth quarters of 1988 parijat scheme and that has its roots according to mr. vyas, in a purely non-statutory contract; the constitutional provisions are not applicable and therefore, no writ petition can be entertained. in support of his submission, mr. vyas has placed reliance on a decision of ..... of the respondents, separate replies to the writ petitions have been filed, in which, it has been contended that the members of the petitioners samities have entered into individual contracts and they have not formed any registered cooperative societies and, therefore, these writ petitions are not maintainable. as regards payments of registration fees and other instalments of parijat scheme, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 1992 (HC)

Swastika Woollen Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jun-05-1992

Reported in : 1992(62)ELT17(Raj)

..... a tender is invited for importation of 'rags', the item 'rags' must be given its ordinary trade meaning known to exporters and importers of such item. it is not a contract made between two parties in india but relates to offers for goods which is made with parties outside this country. admittedly it was for the stc to import rags and ..... the cost involved in mutilating the garments as required by the authorities in india would be enormous and impracticable. it has been submitted that the petitioner companies have entered into contracts with their suppliers to pay to them .50 cents per kilogram of the said goods. it has been submitted that if the imported rags are required to be cut into ..... they would also receive the same treatment, instructed their foreign suppliers to further export the material under the remaining part of the contract by sending the said goods to the extent they were agreed upon to be exported under the contract. so far as the collector of customs, jaipur was concerned, there were no guidelines for the required standard of mutilation and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1992 (HC)

Newar Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Electricity Boar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-06-1992

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1191; 1992(3)WLC126

..... made by relevant parts of annexures 1, 2 and 4 by the parties is declared to be unlawful and void under section 23 of the contract act and the respondents are hereby restrained from realising any further amount from the petitioner-company on the basis of the compounding agreement arrived at ..... is not entitled to claim a refund of the part of consideration money that was paid by him with full knowledge of the illegality of the contract.31. the result of the above discussion is that the writ petition is partly allowed, the compounding of the offence under section 39 of the ..... to itself. this consideration or object is clearly opposed to public policy and hence the compounding agreement is unlawful and void under section 23 of the contract act. it is unenforceable as against the petitioner-company.29. the remedy provided to the board under condition no. 29 of the 'general conditions ..... for the various categories of consumers. so far as high-tension consumers are concerned, the board has fixed rs. 1,500/- per kva of the contract demand. it is for the consumers to take the benefit of this scheme. since the petitioner volunteered to take the benefit of the scheme and compounded ..... is a consumer of ht electricity supply from the supplier rajasthan state electricity board (for short, 'the board') since 14th april, 1989 under a sanctioned contract demand of 300 kva with a sanctioned connected load of 537.5 bep. the petitioner company provided 'consumer's sub-station or an enclosed switch station' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 1992 (HC)

Mewar Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Electricity Boar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-06-1992

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)309

..... made by relevant parts of annexures-1, 2 and 4 by the parties is declared to be unlawful and void under section 23 of the contract act and the respondents are hereby restrained from realising any further amount from the petitioner-company on the basis of the compounding agreement arrived at ..... not entitled to claim a refund of the part of consideration money that was paid by him with full knowledge of the illegaility of the contract.31. the result of the above discussion is that the writ petition is partly allowed, the compounding of the offence under section 39 of the ..... to itself. this consideration or object is clearly opposed to public policy and hence the compounding agreement is unlawful and void under section 23 of the contract act. it is unenforceable as against the petitioner-company.29. the remedy provided to the board under condition no. 29 of the 'general conditions of ..... the various categories of consumers. so far as high-tension consumers are concerned, the board has fixed rs. 1,500/- per kva of the contract demand. it is for the consumers to take the benefit of this scheme. since the petitioner volunteered to take the benefit of the scheme and compounded ..... is a consumer of ht electricity supply from the supplier rajasthan state electricity board (for short, 'the board') since 14th april, 1989 under a sanctioned contract demand of 300 kva with a sanctioned connected load of 537.5 bhp. the petitioner company provided 'consumer's substation or an enclosed switch station' for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 1992 (HC)

Sohan Raj and anr. Vs. Amar Chand and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-23-1992

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC62; 1992(1)WLN528

..... the moneys hereby secured.in ishar dass v. dhanwant singh : air1985delhi83 , it has been held that the disputed document was contemporaneously written and gave particulars of the bargain of the contract between the parties. in bihari lal lahoti v. harendra nath sharma : air1983cal209 , the disputed document was executed for repayment for mortgaged dues and payment of interest thereon and as such ..... the other hand, its proper construction and the surrounding circumstances lead to the conclusion that the parties did not intend to do so, then, there being no express bargain, the contract to create the mortage arises by implication of the law from the deposit itself with the requisite intention, and the document being merely evidential does not require registration.8. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 1992 (HC)

Bajrang Lal Vs. Asst. Engineer, Pwd and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-1992

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ855Raj; 1993(3)WLC551

..... the holidays. the petitioner has completely failed to show that he is entitled to be paid wages for sundays or any other holiday either under a contract of employment or under some provision of law. it is, therefore, not possible to accept the plea of the learned counsel for the petitioner that ..... as laying down a proposition that the employee will be deemed to have actually worked on sundays or holidays irrespective of the fact that there is a contract of service, express or implied, or statute which entitled the employee to claim wages for the said period should be counted. with great respect those ..... and chhagan lal's case, on which learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance, there is any finding that there was an express or implied contract of service or there was a provision contained in the statute or standing order etc. which entitled the workman the receive wages even though he may ..... though he may not have worked with hammer, sickle or pen, only if he is paid or is entitled tc be paid wages either under a contract of employment or under some provision of law. otherwise he is not entitled to raise such a claim.11. from the above quoted decisions it is ..... comprehend all those days during which he was in the employment of the employer and for which he had been paid wages either under express or implied contract of serv- -ice or by compulsion of statute, standing orders, etc.their lordships further observed that there was no reason to give a restricted meaning .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1992 (HC)

Ganga Ram Bhandari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-27-1992

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)1

..... and economic cooperation (itec) programme of the ministry of external affairs and other aid programmes,(ii) posted abroad in foreign based offices of the ministries/departments,(iii) on a specific contract assignment to a foreign government, unless, after having been transferred to india, he has resumed the charge of the post in india and served for a period of not less .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //