Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: rajasthan Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.016 seconds)

Aug 30 1993 (HC)

Akhil Raj Rajya Hand Pump Mistries Sanghathan and anr. Vs. State of Ra ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-30-1993

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ631Raj; 1994(1)WLC1

..... employment for rural youth, who after training could take to independent vocations, that the scheme was formulated. a lateral source of sustenance was provided to them by granting them contracts. the true extent of control exercisable upon them was really missed. we have already shown that the extent of control exercisable by panchayat samitis was minimal and was very much ..... hence, we shall have to examine if really a relationship of master and servant had emerged between the concerned panchayat samitis and the hand pump mistries and engagement 'on contract' was merely a legal device to deprive the hand pump mistries of their legitimate rights obtaining under various pieces of labour welfare legislation or it was a genuine policy 'decision ..... it is submitted that members of the appellant-unions were neither employees, nor 'workmen' serving under respective panchayat samitis. thier relationship was of a special nature; it was a contract assignment. hence, the appeals deserved to be dismissed.15. we have given our earnest consideration to the rival contentions and have carefully perused the record of the two cases. we ..... employed by the two panchayat samitis was that of employee and employer, notwithstanding the fact that the orders employing the members of petitioner-appellant unions gave the nomenclature of 'contract' to the relationship. it is urged that this court can go behind the screen and unveil the same and ascertain the true nature of relationship existing between the hand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1993 (HC)

Nizam and ors. Vs. Jaipur Development Authority and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-12-1993

Reported in : AIR1994Raj87; 1993(2)WLC169

..... sine qua non to its validity and in this respect, the state cannot claim comparison with a private individual even in the field of contract. this distinctionbetween the state and a private individual in the field of contract has to be borne in the mind.'19. another important contention raised by mr. p.c. jain, learned counsel appearing for the residents of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1993 (HC)

Syal Brothers and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-23-1993

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC19; 1993WLN(UC)509

..... by this court in the case of shakuntla and three others (supra). i have held that mere draw of lots neither created any right in the petitioners nor a binding contract came into being, as such, there was no violation of the principles of natural justice in cancelling the said draw. the board was also not required to state reasons for ..... a public body. the question, therefore, arises for decision whether the petitioners can claim any legal right to have the allotment of plots in their favour or whether a binding contract came into being on the basis of which they were entitled to get plots.?9. as pointed out earlier, the entire action of the then officers of the board was ..... learned counsel for petitioners has raised various points in his arguments and they are set out as follows:(i) after the draw of lots on 25.1.1990, a binding contract came into being on the basis of which the petitioners were entitled to claim allotment of plots.(ii) the board was estopped from going back on the 'doctrine of promissory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1993 (HC)

Ratan Lal Soni Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-29-1993

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC679; 1993WLN(UC)194

..... to any litigation whether in private of public action in relation to any specific remedy sought for has to be primarily at the threshold.35. it was further held:in contract, the strict rule of locus standi applicable to private litigation is relaxed and a broad rule is evolved which gives the right of locus standi to any member of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1993 (HC)

Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-11-1993

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ1219Raj; 1993(1)WLC698

..... indirectly to infringe upon the rights of the workers. likewise, the employee cannot be permitted to volunteer to work beyond the prescribed hours. if the employer was given permission to contract out of the provisions of 1948 act, the whole object with which these provisions have been enacted will be frustrated.7. the order of the labour court which has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1993 (HC)

Mohammed Ayub Vs. Mohammed and Sons and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-16-1993

Reported in : (1995)ILLJ978Raj

..... does not relate to a controversy where existence of contract is disputed.50. same is the view taken by allahabad high court in general manager, n.e.b., gorakhpur vs surajnath dubcy (1980-ii-llj-242 ..... only question which was to be determined for the purpose of deciding the claim under the act was as to terms of which of the subsisting contract would cover the claim and that matter was held to be incidental to the determination of claim, that could be entertained under act. the case ..... w.e.f. may 10, 1971 and the claimant's case is that notwithstanding the termination of services w.e.f. may 10, 1971, the contract of services continues to subsist as a result of the subsequent settlement. according to the decision relied on by the petitioner, such a dispute cannot be ..... relating to the termination of an existing employment and reinstatement thereafter, while there is conflict opinion on the question whether existence of contract of employment can be considered to be falling within the purview of examining as to what are the terms of employment but there is no conflict ..... on may 10, 1971 and thereafter he was never reinstated to which the claimant's reply was that no doubt, services were terminated but thereafter contract of employer and employee still subsists as a result of subsequent settlement. this is the dispute really speaking not relating to the terms of employment but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1993 (HC)

Aditya Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-10-1993

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ76Raj; 1993(3)WLC1

..... -company can manufacture the goods for some other company or that aditya mills ltd. is no longer interested in getting the clothes manufactured or there is a breach of the contract, the question which arises for the purpose of interpretation of section 16(1)(d) is whether an establishment which has newly been set up can be denied the benefit only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1993 (HC)

Jagdishmal Bhansali Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. (49)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-03-1993

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ209Raj; 1994(1)WLC664

..... premium thereunder should be paid within 30 days from the date of that acceptance is in law a counter offer to be completed thereafter into contract by the fulfilment of that condition as required thereunder.41. it was contended by mr. singhvi, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent insurance ..... seeking insurance is depending on the payment of the premium then that acceptance of proposal is a counter offer and the proposal turns into a contract only when the premium is paid.40. in this respect, mr. munshi has placed reliance on a decision of the patna high court in ..... his state of health and other matters, and a declaration that the statements were true and were to be taken as the basis of the contract. the proposal was accepted at a specified premium but upon the terms that no insurance should take effect till the premium was paid. before tender ..... and, therefore, keeping in view the aforesaid provisions of section 64vb of the act as also the observations made in lesson iii, relating to contracts in the general insurance manual issued by the respondent insurance company, which have been quoted hereinabove, the petitioner being development officer of the respondent insurance ..... attention was drawn to the general insurance manual issued by the respondent insurance company, wherein, on page 14, it has been provided in lesson iii (contracts) as follows:-'once the offer is made, the insurers go through the information supplied and decide whether to accept the offer or not. this is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //