Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: uk supreme court Year: 1881 Page 6 of about 55 results (0.044 seconds)

1881

Flanders Vs. Seelye

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1881

..... on a.'s order, to hold "the amount against the cotton." shortly thereafter, a. directed b. to deliver the cotton to c., the claimant, upon his giving a bond of indemnity. c. gave the required bond to save harmless the government, the seizing agent, and the officers and agents of the treasury on account of the seizure and detention of the ..... from the obligation which one has contracted to pay the whole or a part of a debt, due by another to a third person." "art. 382. the defendant wishing to call one in warranty may, in his ..... of practice of louisiana as having a bearing on this case. they are as follows: "art. 378. the obligation which one contracts to defend another in some action which may be instituted against him is termed warranty. the one who has contracted this obligation is called the warrantor." "art. 379. . . . personal warranty is that which takes place in personal actions; it arises .....

Tag this Judgment!

1881

Miller Vs. Brass Company

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1881

..... , to be issued to the patentee." it will be observed that whilst the law authorizes a reissue when the patentee has claimed too much, so as to enable him to contract his claim, it does not in terms authorize a reissue to enable him to expand his claim. the great object of the law of reissues seems to have been to .....

Tag this Judgment!

1881

Bank Vs. Tennessee

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1881

..... extended to property used beyond the actual wants of the corporation in carrying out the purposes of its creation. as well observed by the supreme court of the state, the contract of exemption, beyond the extent prescribed, ceased when taxable property was held for any other purpose. it is true that the capital stock of a corporation may in a general .....

Tag this Judgment!

1881

Shanks Vs. Klein

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1881

..... of justice, and that no power existed in brown, the surviving partner, to convey the legal title vested in shanks by the will of johnston, nor even to make a contract for the sale of the real estate which a court will enforce against shanks as the holder of that title. counsel for the appellees, while conceding that neither the deed .....

Tag this Judgment!

1881

Smelting Company Vs. Kemp

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1881

..... government to supervise the progressive course of the title from its commencement to its consummation in a patent;" but there were some things so essential to the validity of a contract, that the great principles of justice and of law would be violated did there not exist some tribunal to which an injured party might appeal, and in which the means .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //