Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Sorted by: old Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.046 seconds)

Jan 23 1969 (HC)

Dayal Saran Sanan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-23-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H75

..... mentioned in the memorandum that it had been reported that the petitioner had been insolent and insubordinate to his superiors, and had not cared to study the provisions of the contract in question. in paragraph 3 of this communication, it was mentioned that the petitioner had been struck off the strength of garrison. engineer lalru, on february 12, 1965,on permanent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1969 (HC)

Puran Chand Hari Parshad Vs. Mangal Nanak Saini

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-1969

Reported in : AIR1969P& H367

..... date of the application for eviction, the only way to compensate the landlord for the loss of interest on the amount which should have been in his hands under the contract much earlier, is to pay him the interest up to the date when the amount is actually paid out. any other construction of the provision for payment of interest would ..... has enacted in sub-section (1) of section 13 of the act that a lease would not be forfeited in spite of the breach of an express condition of the contract of lease, it has been ensured that the landlord is not unjustly deprived of the main consideration for which he demised the property in favour of tenant by giving it ..... amount of the increase in such rate, cess or tax, as the case may be. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or any contract, no landlord shall recover from his tenant the amount of any tax of any portion thereof in respect of any building or rented land occupied by such tenant by any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1969 (HC)

Jagan Nath Piare Lal Vs. Mittar SaIn and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-13-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H104

..... effected, does not create a fresh tenancy in favour of the mortgagee. but there is nothing to prevent the tenant to surrender his earlier tenancy and enter into a fresh contract of tenancy with the mortgagee; and in each case, it will have to be determined on evidence, whether a tenant of the mortgagor did surrender his tenancy and obtained a ..... any such specific provision in the contract of mortgage i am of the opinion that the tenant did not surrender his rights, and that the intention of the parties to the mortgage must be interpreted as being ..... by the mortgage, and that the owner would be entitled to immediate possession on the redemption of the mortgage, this would have been bound to be specified in the mortgage contract and there would in the agreement have been an express surrender by the mortgagee of the rights secured by him as a tenant under the act. in the absence of ..... the tenant in the tenancy on the redemption of the mortgage is a question of fact to be decided according to the terms of the contract between the parties in each case. in this case, the contract is completely silent as to what was to happen if and when the mortgage was redeemed, and it seems quite possible that no trouble at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1969 (HC)

Bishamber Dutt Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Gian Chand Charan Das

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-15-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H60

..... when the act was applicable to the building concerned, yet if the pre-decessor-in-interest could seek ejectment on the ground of subletting because of the terms of the contract or any special law or rules that are applicable, it can well be argued that the transferee should be entitled to take advantage of such a subletting if the same ..... given is that under the ordinary law of the land, a landlord can get rid of his tenant at any time he likes, unless prohibited by the terms of the contract, by giving the requisite notice. by the act, the tenant is given protection from such an ejectment and the landlord can seek ejectment only on the grounds mentioned in the ..... under which any such requirement can be imposed upon the tenant. the only other situation in which such requirement can be imposed upon a tenant is a term of the contract of tenancy but no such argument and basis of the term of tenancy has been urged in the present case nor do i understand was there any such argument in ..... restriction act because immediately after the transfer the exemption goes. however, in view of section 29 of the rehabilitation act, the landlord cannot eject his tenant notwithstanding any terms of contract between the parties. proviso to section 29(1) of the rehabilitation act is in the following terms:--'provided that notwithstanding anything contained in any such terms and conditions, no such .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1969 (HC)

Madan Lal Lamba Vs. Inderjit Mehta

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-19-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H200; 1970CriLJ726

..... sub-divisional officer to maintain the officer's note book and to make correct entries representing the actual supplies of stone ballast made by the respondent in execution of his contract work. the petitioner prepared page 11 of the officer's note book in his official capacity. if the petitioner while preparing page 11 of the officer's note book or ..... supplied 1400 cubic feet of stone ballast to madan lal lamba in his capacity as sub-divisional officer in charge of the contract. the sub-divisional officer checked the material on june 3, 1964. he made an entry at page 11 in the officer's note book no. 35. therunning bill of the ..... by a complaint filed by inderjit mehta for offence under section 218, indian penal code was not necessary.2. briefly stated, the facts are that inderjit mehta entered into a contract on april 25, 1964 for supply of stone ballast to the public works department of the punjab government for construction of lassara nala and bhatinda-dabwali road.3. inderjit mehta .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1969 (HC)

Smt. Ram Piari Vs. Piara Lal P.C.S. Divisional Agricultural Officer, P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H341

..... the earlier sections of the act. these words were held not to restrict the application of section 25 to only those cases where a party was in a position to contract a second marriage or where the marriage bond stood dissolved or severed. this condition was supposed to govern the conduct of the parties in future and the maintenance order could ..... of by the applicant only as long as he had remained immarried meaning thereby that in spite of his being in a position to do so. the applicant had not contracted another marriage.2. in surjit kaur v. pargat singh, ilr (1964) 2 punj 100, a ruling mentioned in the order of reference, shamsher bahadur, j. took the view that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1969 (HC)

Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-06-1969

Reported in : [1969]74ITR484(P& H)

..... jj. of the calcutta high court held that in a case where the assessee-company had terminated the services of some of its senior european employees before the period of contract with them had expired with a view to reduce administration costs and also to accelerate the promotion of the junior employees and paid them lump sum compensation, the expenditure was ..... general meeting of the shareholders on 2nd december, 1952. the managing agents, after receiving the resolution on 3rd december, 1952, wrote back that the resolution constituted a breach of the contract of the managing agency and lodged a claim for rs. 8,87,800 as compensation, out of which rs. 8,22,168-13-3 was for premature termination of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1969 (HC)

Gurdev Singh and ors. Vs. Mohna Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-1969

Reported in : AIR1969P& H422

..... in the brother's son of the vendor.6. section 19-a of the ceiling act runs as follows:-'(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law, custom, usage, contract or agreement, from and after the commencement of the punjab security of land tenures (amendment) ordinance, 1958, no person, whether as land-owner or tenant, shall acquire or possess by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 1969 (HC)

Mam Raj Chhoga and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-19-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H23

..... is made in sub-section (1) of section 18 of the act which is to this effect:--'18. (1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, usage or contract, a tenant of a landowner other than a small landowner -- (i) who has been in continuous occupation of the land comprised in his tenancy for a minimum period of six .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1969 (HC)

Kanianwali Co-operative Farming Society at Kanianwali Through Its Secr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H157

..... will not affect the right of the land owner to receive rent from the tenant so settled. 19-a.(1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law, custom, usage, contract or agreement from and after the commencement of the punjab security of land tenures (amendment) ordinance, 1958, no person whether, as land-owner, or tenant, shall acquire or possess by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //