Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Year: 1969 Page 9 of about 110 results (0.015 seconds)

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Badri Prasad and anr. Vs. Imdad Hasan Khan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All401

..... not at the rate claimed.11. as regards the amount of government revenue alleged to have been paid, the obligation to pay the revenue was, under the terms of the contract embodied in the instrument of the 20th of december 1871, on the mortgagor. if the mortgagor did not pay that amount and the mortgagee had to pay it in order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

G.S. Jones Vs. H. Ledgard and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1886)ILR8All340

..... the first point, it seems to me the answer is to be found in the language of clause 32 of the partnership-deed. that partners may, in a partnership-deed, contract that future disputes shall be settled in a particular manner which ousts the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals, is undoubted, and is a condition which is recognized by the courts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Bhawani Prasad and anr. Vs. Ghulam Muhammad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All121

..... the village. the object of the legislature in enacting section 7 was to provide some sort of protection to proprietors of land whose rights were parted with either by private contract or auction sale. the legislature intended that such proprietors should not be cast on the world, but should still be left with some interest in the lands which they had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Ganga Bai Vs. Sita Ram

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All170

..... the sale was made to pay debts. it was then a sale which the son himself, if alive, could not have resisted, for it is not suggested the debts were contracted for immoral purposes. consequently, in our judgment, the alienation by the father-in-law does not in this case impose on him personal liability of maintaining the appellant.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mathura Singh Vs. Bhawani Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All248

..... title torecovery of land. immoveable property, except-(a) claims in respect of mesne profits or arrears of rent in respect of the property claimed,(b) damages for breach of any contract under which the property or any part thereof are or is held, and(c) claims by a mortgagee to enforce any of his remedies under the mortgage.rule b.--no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Kishen Lal and ors. Vs. Nehalo

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All162

robert stuart, c.j.1. after repeated consideration of the arguments and authorities referred to in this case, i feel that i can add nothing to what is clearly laid down in the judgment of the calcutta high court. but in expressing this opinion i desire to confine myself to the principles and authorities of the hindu law, for i can derive no useful analogy from any rule or principle of the law of england or from any other european system of jurisprudence.pearson, j.2. the question referred to the full bench has been exhaustively considered and discussed by the learned judges of the calcutta high court. it seems unnecessary to repeat at length the arguments used by them on both sides of the question and impossible to add thereto. after full consideration, the conclusion to which i have come is that the question was rightly answered in the negative by the majority of those learned judges, and that we should return the same answer to the bench which has put the question to us.3. the opposite conclusion is certainly not an unavoidable inference from the text of catayana mainly relied on in support of it: 'let the sonless widow, preserving (unsullied) her husband's bed and residing with her venerable relative, eat or enjoy moderately' not so long, be it observed, as she remains chaste or resides with her protector but 'until her death.' the text is in its form and may well be in substance a mere injunction. it enjoins submission to the venerable relative, purity of life, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Man Singh and anr. Vs. Ghure and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All226

..... the present that the record of village custom does set out that pre-emption in chanderbhanporeat the time when the settlement record was prepared rested upon custom, and not upon contract then prepared among the share holders it is necessary to examine with great care and minuteness the exact nature of the custom, the extent to which it prevailed and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Dondh Bahadur Rai and ors. Vs. Tek NaraIn Rai and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1899)ILR21All251

..... in second appeal. the respondent relies on section 76(c) of the transfer of property act. as it is his own case that there was in the mortgage deed 'a contract to the contrary' providing that the mortgagors and not the mortgagee should pay the rent, it is obvious, without going any further, that section 76 cannot help him. the only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Ramjiwan Mal and ors. Vs. Chand Mal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All587

straight, j.1. this appeal relates to a suit which was instituted by the plain tiffs-appellants before us in the court of the subordinate judge of azamgarh upon a plaint which, alleging a partnership as subsisting between the plaintiffs and the defendants, prayed for the following relief: ' that the plaintiffs pray the court to decree a dissolution of the partnership, and that the accounts of the said partnership trading may be taken by the court and the assets thereof realized, and that each party may be ordered to pay into court any balance due from him upon such partnership-account, and that the debts and liabilities of the partnership may be paid and discharged, and that the costs of the suit may be paid out of the partnership assets, and that any balance remaining of such assets, after such payment and discharge and the payment of the said costs, may be divided between the plaintiffs and the defendants according to the terms of the agreement, or that if the said assets prove insufficient, the plaintiffs and the defendants may be ordered to contribute, in such proportion as shall be just, to a fund to be raised for the payment and discharge of such debts, liabilities and costs, and to such other reliefs as the court shall think fit. the approximate value of the claim is rs. 2,000.'2. now that was a suit which undoubtedly was framed and presented to the court in contemplation of the provisions of section 215, civil procedure code. but it is unnecessary for me in dealing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Hardeo Das and anr. Vs. Hukam Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All322

pearson, j.1. the appeal must, in our opinion, prevail. the lower court has erred in applying the provisions of section 210, act x of 1877, to this suit, which is not a mere suit for money but asks for the recovery of the amount of a bond-debt by the sale of the property hypothecated in the bond section 210 was not intended to enable the courts to set aside and over-ride such a contract as that on the basis of which the present claim is laid. the security over the hyothecated property which it gave for the payment of the debt would be of little value, if it could be so set aside and over-ridden. the plaintiffs are entitled to an award against the defendants of the principal sum (rs. 12,000), with interest at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum to date of decree, and to interest from the latter date to the date of realization at the rate of six per cent, per annum, and to their costs with interest thereon at the same rate; and to be empowered to recover the amount of the bond-debt by the sale of the hypothecated property. the decree of the lower courts is modified accordingly; and the costs of this appeal are allowed.

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //