Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 147 results (0.019 seconds)

May 20 2015 (HC)

Raman Vs. Cochin Devaswom Board

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-20-2015

..... indemnify, says that a master is bound to indemnify his servant for all expenses incurred or loss sustained in obeying his lawful orders. it is also mentioned that no express contract of indemnity is required; the law will presume, from the relation of master and servant, an obligation to hold the latter harmless from the consequences of sa no.1028/2001 17 ..... loss is sustained by the latter persons, during the course of their employment. however, the question that crops up for decision, in the absence of any specific contract, is whether the appellant could claim indemnity against the board for the loss sustained by a third party on account of the act of an elephant owned by the board and kept by the ..... context, following principles will have to be remembered. it is true that mutual rights and obligations between master and servant depend on the terms of the contract of employment. although right of indemnity generally arises by a contract, express or implied, it has been said to exist whenever the relationship between the parties is such that either in law or in equity there ..... invoking the said provision. the tortfeasor claiming exemption from paying contribution to the other tortfeasor, based on the principle of indemnity contained in the section, should establish a legal right to make such a claim based either on a statute or a contract or common law principles. in this case, the salient features prompting me to hold so are that the master .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2015 (HC)

Surendran Vs. Shajahan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-08-2015

..... with proper notice to him.12. apposite would be a reference to the decision in oriental insurance co. ltd. v. meena variyal [(2007) 5 scc428:- "ordinarily, a contract of insurance is a contract of indemnity. when a car belonging to an owner is insured with the insurance company and it is being driven by a driver employed by the insured, when it meets .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2015 (HC)

V.Surendran Vs. State of Kerala and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-2015

..... as mentioned in ext.p3. contention raised in the counter affidavit to the effect that, there exists a contractual obligation by virtue of creation of valid indemnity under the purview of section 125 of the indian contract act, cannot be accepted, based on the legal provisions enabling the confiscation. in the result, the writ petition is to be allowed. ext.p3 impugned ..... was sold in public auction for a sum of rs.43,333/-. but when the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent seeking release of the title deed furnished along with the indemnity bond, the 2nd respondent had issued ext.p3 proceedings stating that the vehicle was released under interim custody on furnishing bond for a value of rs.90,000/- which was ..... was given in exercise of powers vested under section 53 of the act, subject to the condition of the registered owner furnishing security bond along with solvency certificate. on the indemnity executed by the petitioner along with production of the title deed of his immovable property, the vehicle was released. thereafter an order under section 61 a was issued by the ..... .r2(c): true copy of the application submitted by smt.biji mol ext.r2(d): true copy of solvency certificate dt.23.3.1999 ext.r2(e): true copy of indemnity bond dt.24.3.1999 ext.r2(f): true copy of order dt.21.4.1999 /true copy/ p ato judge mjl c.k. abdul rehim, j.--------------------------- wp(c)no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //