Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 25 results (0.028 seconds)

Oct 01 2002 (HC)

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Through Its Regional Manager Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-01-2002

Reported in : II(2003)ACC677; 2003ACJ1454; (2003)133PLR783

..... insurance which stipulates to pay compensation for the death of the insured person himself cannot be said to be a contract of indemnity. if the owner of the vehicle, who has the benefit of indemnity is himself not covered by the policy, his representatives unless he be an employee covered by the first proviso to section 5(1)(b) is in no better ..... is to be compensated. their lordships of the karnataka high court held that owner of the karnataka high court held that owner of the vehicle who has the benefit of indemnity is himself not covered and his representative is in no better position unless he be an employee covered by the first proviso of section 85(1)(b) of the act ..... .e. his father. in that case, the son of the owner of the goods vehicle was accompanying the goods and not as an employee. it was observed that basically a contract of motor insurance seeks to indemnify the owner of the vehicle against liability arising out of claims of third parties arising against the insured owner out of the use of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2002 (HC)

Rajan Gupta Vs. Chandigarh Administration and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-16-2002

Reported in : (2003)134PLR93

..... of the site in question. if the petitioners within a reasonable time has not been delivered the possession, it will be considered as a lapse and negligence and breach of contract on the part of the respondents for which the petitioners cannot be held responsible. the chain for correspondence would sow that the petitioners have not committed any default in the ..... a sum of rs.9 lacs and odd vide two drafts clearly indicating that they had the intention to purchase the plot. they had not committed any breach of the contract nor they have shown any unwillingness to take the possession of the site had it been offered to them without a reasonable time. they had been writing and pressing hard .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2002 (HC)

Kata Singh Vs. Jaswant Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-29-2002

Reported in : (2003)134PLR90

..... . no.155 nor there is any mention that from rect. no.155 any land measuring 9 kanals shall be transferred in favour of the plaintiff. section 29 of the indian contract act lays down that all agreements, the meaning of which is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void and illustration (a) 6f the above section is very .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2002 (HC)

Girnari Devi and ors. Vs. Gopal Dass and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-31-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR136

..... if such matters exceed the subject-matter of the suit. the relationship of counsel and his party or the recognised agent and his principal is a matter for contract; and with the freedom of contract generally, the legislature does not interfere except when warranted by public policy and the legislative intent is expressly made manifest. there is no such declaration of policy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rajinder Pal Sood

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-23-2002

Reported in : 2004ACJ1301; (2003)133PLR643

..... after getting him fully and properly medically examined and after fully satisfying himself about the other particulars. he received annual premium of rs.1500/-from him. in this manner,complete contract of insurance was reached between the parties. he felt acute pain in chest along with suffocation and went to escorts heart institute and research centre, okhla road, new delhi on ..... that 'by section 45 the nice distinction created by the doctrine of warranty under the english common law has been eliminated. the insurer cannot avoid the consequences of the insurance contract by simply showing inaccuracy or, falsity of the statement made in the proposal for insurance, or in any report of the medical officer, or in any other document leading to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2002 (HC)

Smt. Krishna Rani Vs. Ram Kishan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR88

..... to the condition to the grant of the permission by the competent authority. the petitioners having expressly admitted that the respondents have refused to abide by the terms of the contract, they should have asked for the relief of specific performance in the original suit itself. having allowed the period of seven years elapsed from the date of filing of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2002 (HC)

Daljit Singh Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-31-2002

Reported in : [2002]256ITR545(P& H)

..... income-tax authorities'. this clearly shows that the possession handed over was merely permissive possession and could not be equated with handing over the possession in part performance of the contract of the nature referred to in section 53a of the transfer of property act, 1882. from clause 5, it was evident that the possession of the petitioner was conditional on ..... -emptive purchase nor granted the no objection certificate. according to the appropriate authority, possession of the property had already been handed over to the transferee in part performance of the contract and, as such, the letter and intent of the provisions of chapter xx-c of the act had been violated. the high court, following its earlier decision in the case ..... and that the agreement to sell was not capable of being made certain and was void as per section 29 of the indian contract act, the appropriate authority had found that the agreement to sell was a contingent contract depending upon the orders of the competent authority under the urban land ceiling act and thus the appropriate authority took objections with regard .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 31 2002 (HC)

Daljit Singh Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-31-2002

Reported in : (2002)175CTR(P& H)229

..... income-tax authorities'. this clearly shows that the possession handed over was merely permissive possession and could not be equated with handing over the possession in part-performance of the contract of the nature referred to in section 53a of the transfer of property act, 1882. from clause 5, it was evident that the possession of the petitioner was conditional on ..... -emptive purchase nor granted the no objection certificate. according to the appropriate authority, possession of the property had already been handed over to the transferee in part-performance of the contract and, as such, the letter and intent of the provisions of chapter xx-c of the act had been violated. the high court, following its earlier decision in the case ..... and that the agreement to see was not capable of being made certain and was void as per section 29 of the indian contract act, the appropriate authority had found that the agreement to sell was a contingent contract depending upon the orders of the competent authority under the urban land ceiling act and thus the appropriate authority took objections with regard .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2002 (HC)

Tarun Bhargava Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-29-2002

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR645(P& H); 2003(3)KLT397

..... received half the value of property sold, or the purchaser had paid more than double value. the maxim 'pacta sunt servanda' referred to in the above passage means 'contracts are to be kept'. 82. it would appear from certain recent english cases that the courts in that country have also begun to recognize the possibility of on uconscionable ..... or to the dominant purposeof the contract'. uniform commercial code section 2-302 comment 1..... a bargain is notunconscionable merely because the parties to it are unequal in bargaining position, noreven because the irequality results ..... rules as to contractual capacity, fraud andother invalidating causes; the policy also overlaps with rules which render particularbargains or terms unenforceable on grounds of public polity. policing againstunconscionable contracts or terms has sometimes been accomplished by adverseconstruction of language, by manipulation of the rules of offer and acceptance or bydeterminations that the clause is contrary to public policy, ..... for refusing to implement certain agreements on the ground of inequality of bargaining power. the relevant part of the judgment is extracted below :- '78. although certain types of contracts were illegal or void, as the case may be, at common law, for instance, those contrary to public policy or to commit a legal wrong such as a crime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2002 (HC)

Smt. Sudarshan Chopra and ors. Vs. Vijay Kumar Chopra and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-24-2002

Reported in : [2003]117CompCas660(P& H)

..... to arbitration. -- notwithstanding anything contained in part i or in the code of civil procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), a judicial authority, on being seized of a dispute regarding a contract made between persons to whom section 53 applies and including an arbitration agreement, whether referring to present or future differences, which is valid under that section and capable of being ..... the arbitration agreement, and particularly so, when the latter is contained not in a separate agreement, but, as in the present case, in one of the clauses of the main contract.'in order to controvert the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the respondents and more particularly, to overcome the judgments relied upon by him, learned counsel for the appellants ..... complete and exhaustive code. in this behalf, the stance adopted is that the arbitration act, 1996, is merely a procedural law, whereas the substantive law is contained in the indian contract act, 1872. to substantiate the aforesaid aim, he has placed reliance on national thermal power corporation v. singer company and ors. (1992) 2 comp lj 256 (sc) : (1992) 3 scc ..... companies act also, the company law board is assigned several functions under the companies act. the present impugned order is obviously an order passed under section 22a of the securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956, as amended in 1985, and, therefore, it is tried to be contended that section 10f provides that any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //