Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Sorted by: recent Court: us supreme court Year: 1962 Page 2 of about 42 results (0.065 seconds)

Mar 05 1962 (FN)

Teamsters Vs. Lucas Flour Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-05-1962

..... to disputes over broad questions of contractual interpretation and deliberately excluded such a clause with regard to the essentially factual disputes arising out of the application of the contract in particular instances. and there is not a word anywhere else in this agreement which indicates that this perfectly sensible contractual framework for handling these two different ..... v. benedict coal corp., 259 f.2d 346 (affirmed on this question by an equally divided court, 361 u. s. 459 ), for differing interpretations of an identical contract. mr. justice black, dissenting. the petitioner local union and the respondent company entered into a written collective bargaining agreement containing an express provision for the arbitration of disputes growing ..... , contractual prohibition of unfair labor practices: jurisdictional problems, 57 col.l.rev. 52. [ footnote 10 ] of the many state courts which have assumed jurisdiction over suits involving contracts subject to 301, few have explicitly considered the problem of state versus federal law. mccarroll v. los angeles county dist. council of carpenters, 49 cal.2d 45, 60, ..... and prolong disputes as to its interpretation. [ footnote 11 ] indeed, the existence of possibly conflicting legal concepts might substantially impede the parties' willingness to agree to contract terms providing for final arbitral or judicial resolution of disputes. the importance of the area which would be affected by separate systems of substantive law makes the need for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1962 (FN)

Griggs Vs. Allegheny County

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-05-1962

..... for the clearing and protecting of "aerial approaches" from physical "airport hazards" [ footnote 2/9 ] -- a duty explicitly placed on the local communities by the statute ( 1110) and by their contract with the government. page 369 u. s. 94 there is no such duty on the local community to acquire flight airspace. having taken the airspace over griggs' private property for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1962 (FN)

Richards Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-26-1962

..... v. lanza, 349 u. s. 408 ; watson v. employers liability corp., 348 u. s. 66 ; pacific employers ins. co. v. industrial accident comm., 306 u. s. 493 . cf. hartford accident & indemnity co. v. delta & pine land co., 292 u. s. 143 ; home insurance co. v. dick, 281 u. s. 397 . [ footnote 32 ] see, e.g., the cases cited in note 26 ..... any damages against the united states on any claim arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights, whereas he could recover such damages against a private individual, 2680(h); the claimant cannot obtain any recovery against the united states on a claim arising in a foreign ..... ., 183 f.2d 479; levy v. daniels' u-drive auto renting co., 108 conn. 333, 143 a. 163; caldwell v. gore, 175 la. 501, 143 so. 387; burkett v. globe indemnity co., 182 miss. 423, 181 so. 316. [ footnote 27 ] in addition to the cases cited in note 26 supra, see the opinion by mr. justice black in vanston bondholders protective ..... v. armbrecht, 327 u. s. 392 ; clearfield trust co. v. united states, 318 u. s. 363 ; d'oench, duhme & co. v. federal deposit ins. corp., 315 u. s. 447 ; royal indemnity co. v. united states, 313 u. s. 289 ; board of comm'rs of jackson county v. united states, 308 u. s. 343 . see also discussion in hart and wechsler, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1962 (FN)

Retail Clerks Vs. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-26-1962

..... no basis for denying jurisdiction of the action based upon the alleged violation of the "strike settlement agreement." furthermore, the statute's purpose would be defeated by excluding such contracts from "contracts" cognizable under 301(a). see charles dowd box co. v. courtney, 368 u. s. 502 . if this kind of strike settlement were not enforceable under 301 ..... of recognition as exclusive representatives puts them out of court. this issue does not touch upon whether minority unions may demand that employers enter into particular kinds of contracts or the circumstances under which employers may accord recognition to page 369 u. s. 29 unions as exclusive bargaining agents. the question is only whether "labor organization ..... of those limitations on 301(a) or with only one, and, if so, which one. it is argued that congress limited 301(a) jurisdiction to contracts that are "collective bargaining contracts," meaning, so runs the argument, only agreements concerning wages, hours, and conditions of employment concluded in direct negotiations between employers and unions entitled to recognition as ..... to 1957, petitioners had been the collective bargaining representatives of respondents' employees, and had been parties to collective bargaining agreements with respondents. in november, 1957, negotiations for renewal contracts ended in impasse. a strike ensued against one of the respondents, lasalle's, and continued until december 24, 1958; the dispute with the other respondent, lion dry goods .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1962 (FN)

Poller Vs. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-19-1962

..... the introductory clauses of the contract provided: "whereas, midwest [petitioner] has represented to cbs that midwest intends to continue the operation of wcan and all business incidental thereto, and for that purpose cbs proposes ..... vhf stations entered the market. [ footnote 2/8 ] the record shows that poller from the beginning had unsuccessfully tried to persuade cbs to enlarge the term of his affiliation contract cancellation clause from six months to two years, and that, with eyes thus open, he nonetheless proceeded with his substantial equipment investment. [ footnote 2/9 ] one of ..... petitioner is unable to point to any convincing differences between the vertical integration that is accomplished when a network purchases a station and that which results from an affiliation contract. moreover, the very contention now being made here by the petitioner has repeatedly been presented to the federal communications commission, and that agency has consistently adhered to the ..... birth of their alleged conspiracy that such affiliations would be unavailable to petitioner if the cbs tie were broken. moreover, it is patent from the terms of the contract under which cbs purchased petitioner's equipment that petitioner represented to the respondents that he would continue broadcasting operations as an independent from the studio formerly occupied by bartell. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1962 (FN)

Charles Dowd Box Co., Inc. Vs. Courtney

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-19-1962

..... . it was recognized from the outset that such an effort would be purposeless unless both parties to a collective bargaining agreement could have reasonable assurance that the contract they had negotiated would be honored. section 301(a) reflects congressional recognition of the vital importance of assuring the enforceability of such agreements. the direct antecedent ..... s. 188 (concurring opinion). [ footnote 5 ] to hold that 301(a) operates to deprive the state courts of a substantial segment of their established jurisdiction over contract actions would thus be to disregard this consistent history of hospitable acceptance of concurrent jurisdiction. such a construction of 301(a) would also disregard the particularized history behind the enactment ..... was the petitioner's position that its bargaining representatives had acted without authority in negotiating the new agreement, and that the union had been so advised before any contract had actually been concluded. the present action was then brought in the superior court of massachusetts for worcester county by the respondents, local union officers and a ..... the superior court of massachusetts syllabus section 301(a) of the labor management relations act, 1947, which confers on federal district courts jurisdiction over suits for violation of contracts between employers and labor organizations representing employees in industries affecting interstate commerce, does not divest state courts of jurisdiction over such suits. pp. 368 u. s. 502 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1962 (FN)

United States Vs. Drum

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-15-1962

..... but also of the requirement that the persons from whom shippers would purchase a transportation service designed to meet the shippers' distinctive needs must first secure commission approval. see contracts of contract carriers, 1 m.c.c. 628, 629; keystone transportation co., 19 m.c.c. 475, 490-492. the statutory requirement that a certificate or permit be ..... passengers or property in interstate or foreign commerce, for compensation (other than transportation referred to in paragraph (14) of this section and the exception therein), under continuing contracts with one person or a limited number of persons either (a) for the furnishing of transportation services through the assignment of motor vehicles for a continuing period of ..... scheme. the commission resolved the issue adversely to oklahoma and the owner-operators. division 1, one commissioner dissenting, held that the owner-operators were engaged in contract carriage and ordered them to cease and desist from the activities thus found to be unlawful until such time as they had secured the necessary permits from the commission ..... oversight of motor carrier rates -- to administrative controls, on the premise that the public interest in maintaining a stable transportation industry so required. [ footnote 7 ] however, although aware that "both [contract carriers and common carriers] . . . are continually faced with actual or potential competition from private truck operation . . . , [ footnote 8 ]" congress took cognizance of a shipper's .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1962 (FN)

Meat Drivers Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-19-1962

..... members of the appellant union. if that situation should change in the future, the district court will have ample power to amend its decree. [ footnote 7 ] affirmed. [ footnote 1 ] "every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several states, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. . . ." 15 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1962 (SC)

Tulsi Ram Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-1962

Reported in : AIR1963SC666; [1963]Supp(1)SCR382

..... by forged railway receipts would be sufficient to establish his connection with the conspiracy. in addition to this circumstance, he also signed or endorsed 32 indemnity bonds on the strength of which delivery of a large number of consignments, railway receipts in respect of which had been forged, was ultimately taken ..... consignments, the railway receipts of which were tampered but which supported certain hundis drawn by the firm; (2) he signed or endorsed 52 indemnity bonds on the strength of which delivery was taken of the consignments, the railway receipts in respect of which were tampered with and yet were ..... the bank of bikaner, kanpur; (3) cashing a cheque; (4) paying off certain hundis accompanied by forged railway receipt; and (5) signing 32 indemnity bonds. the forwarding notes related to certain consignments on the security of which hundis had been discounted by certain banks. by presenting a cheque to the bank ..... person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery.' 17. the intention to cause damage or injury to the ..... of forged railway receipts because had that been done the fraud would have been immediately discovered. instead, delivery was taken through commission agents on indemnity bonds on the allegation that the railway receipts had been lost. such bonds were executed either by one of the partners or by an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 1962 (FN)

Gilbert Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-1962

..... . 421; yeager v. united states, 59 app.d.c 11, 32 f.2d 402; united states v. tommasello, 64 f.supp. 467; quick service box co. v. st. paul mercury indemnity co., 95 f.2d 15. [ footnote 13 ] the fact that the original 1823 statute had a proviso disclaiming any purpose to preempt state criminal jurisdiction in respect of matters covered ..... the consideration or decision of this case. [ footnote 1 ] 18 u.s.c. 495, provides: "whoever falsely makes, alters, forges, or counterfeits any deed, power of attorney, order, certificate, receipt, contract, or other writing, for the purpose of obtaining or receiving, or of enabling any other person, either directly or indirectly, to obtain or receive from the united states or any .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //