Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Year: 1900 Page 8 of about 84 results (0.038 seconds)

May 28 1900 (FN)

Wheeler Vs. New York, N.H. and H. R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-28-1900

..... may 14, 1900 decided may 28, 1900 178 u.s. 321 error to the supreme court of errors of the state of connecticut syllabus under a statute of connecticut, a contract was entered into between the city of bridgeport and a railroad company providing that the city should pay one-sixth of the expense of abolishing grade crossings, and also of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1900 (FN)

Bardes Vs. Hawarden Bank

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-28-1900

..... that time full cognizance, and it was a prevalent practice to bring any person who contested with the assignee any matter growing out of disputed rights of property or of contracts, into the bankrupt court by the service of a rule to show cause, and to dispose of their rights in a summary way. this court has steadily set its face .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1900 (FN)

United States Vs. Northern Pacific R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-16-1900

..... u. s. 442 of the time named in the statute, or to consider whether the ordinary doctrines of courts of equity, which relieve a contracting party from forfeiture by reason of a failure to complete the contract within the time fixed, when the work is subsequently completed and accepted, would apply to a case like the present. undoubtedly there would seem to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1900 (FN)

Forsyth Vs. Vehmeyer

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-09-1900

..... 200 cords, cut and piled up near the pittsburgh & fort wayne railroad in the county of lake, state of indiana, ready to be shipped to chicago; that one eldridge had contracted to purchase the wood at six dollars per cord in the city of chicago, when shipped, and that, if the plaintiff would advance to the defendant at the rate of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1900 (PC)

Khedu Mahto Vs. Budhun Mahto

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-1900

Reported in : (1900)ILR27Cal508

..... code, which enacts that nothing contained in the code except as provided in the second paragraph of section 3 'shall be deemed to affect any law passed under the indian contract act, 1861, by a lieutenant-governor in council,' i am quoting only so much of the provision as bears upon this case, 'prescribing a special procedure for suits between landholders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 1900 (FN)

Hubbell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Oct-22-1900

..... complete effect the expressed principles of operation of the fulminate of mercury or detonating powder and the powder charge. in this organization, the fulminate, although the superior explosive force, is contracted into a diminished or small central chamber, and fills it. the flange and head of the metallic case are solid, all in one piece. this chamber at its sides or .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1900 (FN)

Deserant Vs. Cerillos Coal R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-28-1900

deserant v. cerillos coal r. co. - 178 u.s. 409 (1900) u.s. supreme court deserant v. cerillos coal r. co., 178 u.s. 409 (1900) deserant v. cerillos coal railroad company no. 269 argued april 27, 1900 decided may 28, 1900 178 u.s. 409 error to the supreme court of the territory of new mexico syllabus the act of congress of march 3, 1891, concerning coal mines, makes three requirements: (1) ventilation of not less than fifty-five feet of pure air per second, or 3300 cubic feet per minute for every fifty men at work, and in like proportions fur a greater number; (2) proper appliances and machinery to force the air through the mine to the face of working places; (3) keeping all workings free from standing gas, and if either of these three requirements was neglected, to the injury of the plaintiff's intestates, the defendant was liable. the act does not give to mine owners the privilege of reasoning on the sufficiency of appliances for ventilation, or leave to their judgment the amount of ventilation that is sufficient for the protection of miners. it does not allow standing gas, but requires the mine to be kept clear of it, and if this is not done, the consequence of neglecting it cannot be excused because some workman may disregard instructions. it is the master's duty to furnish safe appliances and safe working places, and if the neglect of this duty concurs with that of the negligence of a fellow-servant, the master is liable. on the issues made, and on the evidence, and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 1900 (FN)

In Re Conway

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-28-1900

in re conway - 178 u.s. 421 (1900) u.s. supreme court in re conway, 178 u.s. 421 (1900) in re conway no. 9, original submitted april 9, 1900 decided may 28, 1900 178 u.s. 421 original syllabus a national bank was closed by order of the comptroller of the currency and a receiver appointed. an assessment was made upon the holders of stock. overton and hoffer were among those who were assessed, and payment not having been made, suit was brought against them. service page 178 u. s. 422 was made upon h., but not upon o., who was very ill, and who died without service having been made upon him. he left a will, under which j. p. o. was duly appointed his executor. the executor was summoned into the suit by a writ of scire facias. a motion was made to set aside the scire facias and the attempted service thereof, which motion was granted. the executor being substituted in the place of the deceased as defendant, the court decided that it had acquired no jurisdiction over the deceased, and could acquire none over his executor. thereupon the receiver applied to this court for a writ of mandamus to the judges of the circuit court of the united states for the ninth circuit commanding them to take jurisdiction and proceed against j. p. o. as executor of the last will and testament of o., deceased, in the action brought by the receiver to recover the assessments. held: (1) that mandamus was the proper remedy, and the rule was made absolute. (2) that the action of the circuit court in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 1900 (FN)

Mcdonnell Vs. Jordan

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-21-1900

..... , it was said: "the act of march 3, 1887, c. 373, corrected by the act of august 13, 1888, c. 866, was intended, as this court has often recognized, to contract the jurisdiction of the circuit courts of the united states, whether original over suits brought therein, or by removal from the state courts. it not only amends the act of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 1900 (FN)

Rider Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-14-1900

..... held by the lessees of any water rights under any lease or contract with the state of ohio. and the united states hereby assumes control of said river, subject to the paramount interest of navigation. the provisions of this act, so far as ..... now running and in force between the state of ohio and all persons using said water, hereby intending to transfer to the united states such rights in said leases and contracts as are now owned, held, or reserved by the state of ohio, but not to affect any right to the use of the water of said river now owned and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //