Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Year: 1934 Page 16 of about 158 results (0.037 seconds)

Nov 01 1934 (PC)

The Pollachi Town Bank, Limited by Secretary, T.K. Muthuswami Chettiar ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-01-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Mad262(1); (1935)68MLJ316

..... :if the mortgagee holds different mortgages of different properties or successive mortgages of the same property from the same mortgagor, he must enforce all or none, unless there is a contract to the contrary.3. if this interpretation of section 67-a be correct (i am not to be supposed as accepting it), the petitioner's argument would amount to this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1934 (PC)

Mudara and ors. Vs. Muthu Hengsu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Mad33

..... alienate any portion whatever of this property by way of mulgenj etc., (alienation by way of shelgeni being excepted). such alienations if made should be invalid. if necessity arises for contracting debts on the liability of this property all the major members of both the branches should jointly do so. if the members of each branch ..... contract debts as they please, they should be personally liable for such debts but the property should not be held liable therefor.5. as i have found that the two sharers- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1934 (PC)

Konduri Suryanarayana Rao Vs. Vegasana Venkataraju

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-07-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Mad64; 153Ind.Cas.2

..... action of the recovery of the debt will be fixed, not merely as against the mortgagor but also as against intermediate mortgagees, in accordance with the terms of the new contract. the importance of this principle in the present case arises out of this fact that the renewal under ex. a was effected at a time, when according to the law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1934 (PC)

Surath Chandra Saha Vs. Kripanath Chowdhury and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-30-1934

Reported in : AIR1934Cal549,150Ind.Cas.925

..... and delivery.2. the hand-note is promissory note, and a promissory note is a written acknowledgment of debt with a promise to repay. it is also a memorandum of contract, and evidence of a chose in action or actionable claim. thus, it may be transferred by assignment, and the assignee thereby gets such title as the assignor had in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1934 (PC)

Nagendra Nath Biswas Vs. Kripanath Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-06-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Cal94

..... by the principles enunciated in the case reported in bauga chandra dhur biswas v. jagat kishore 1916 pc 110. the necessity for the sale alleged in the payment of debts contracted is connexion with the sradh of kali nath and the probate proceedings. the learned subordinate judge's judgment on this part of the case is not very clear. but i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 20 1934 (PC)

indu Bala Dassi and anr. Vs. Lakshmi Narayan Ganguly and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-20-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Cal102,155Ind.Cas.1109

..... was merged in the express promise to pay as contained in the promissory notes and consequently the alternative claim, namely, the claim on the original debt alleged to have been contracted by the kartas of the joint family for the purposes of joint family and joint business, is not sustainable in law. in the present proceeding it is not necessary to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1934 (PC)

Panmall Jesraj Vs. Mr. J. Macleod

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Cal190

..... in the present proceedings it will be sufficient for us to say that it will be open to panna chand jetmull or any of the partners acting under section 263, contract act, to put in their claims and, if so put in, such claims will be investigated according to law. with this reservation we confirm the learned judge's directions as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1934 (PC)

Jnanana Prasanna Bhaduri and ors. Vs. Hemendra Nath Roy Choudhury and ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-11-1934

Reported in : AIR1935Cal228

..... case of estoppel can arise as the plaintiff does not claim the estate through his father. mr. ghose contended that what the father was really doing was to make a contract for the benefit of his minor son, who is therefore bound by it. there can be no question that the son was benefited by it. this aspect of the matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //