Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: debentures companies act Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.047 seconds)

Jul 08 1981 (HC)

Satyapramoda Thirthaswamulavaru Vs. Mula Gunnayya (Deceased) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-08-1981

Reported in : AIR1982AP24

..... its immoveable property or any interest therein to trustees upon trust for the benefit of the holders of such debentures; or (iv) any endorsement upon or transfer of any debenture issued by any such company; or (v) any document not itself creating, declaring assigning, limiting or extinguishing any right, title or ..... the plaintiff-mutt lost title to the suit lands by virtue of the notification issued under the madras inams abolition and conversion into ryotwari act, 1948, (act xxvi of 1948), that the suit properties vested in the government and that the government made a demand and collected revenue of rupees ..... . it is true that there was some difference of judicial opinion about the availability of the presumption enacted in sec. 90 of the evidence act to the certified copies of the original documents.24. the supreme court in sital das v. sant ram : air1954sc606 reiterating the principles enunciated ..... enter into a compromise, and therefore, the compromise entered into by subbarayacharulu is invalid. under ex. a-2, the above two persons were to act jointly and severally. they were empowered to grant pattas toryots and obtain muchilikas in respect of the schedule lands covered by t. d. no. ..... this appeal is 'whether a compromise decree if it operates as a lease is invalid for want of registration under section 17 of the indian registration act' ?2. the plaintiff, uttaradi mutt, is a religious institution. sri satyapramoda thirtha swamulavaru is the head of the uttaradi mutt. sri m. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1981 (HC)

Hyderabad Vanaspathi Ltd. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-22-1981

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas654(AP)

..... relevant year within three months from the date of the order, filing which they shall be liable for action under section 614a(2) of the companies act 1956. 5. aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, the accused have preferred this criminal revision case. the only question that falls for consideration ..... a continuing one or a completed one, has to be decided from the very language of the rule contravened. in this case, rule 10 directs that every company to which these rules apply, shall file with the registrar, on or before 30th june, a return in the form annexed to the rules, furnishing the ..... form annexed to these rules and furnishing the information contained therein as on the 31st day of march of that year (duly certified by the auditor of the company). (2) a copy of the returns shall also be simultaneously furnished to the reserve bank of india. [notes : 1 the amendment rules 1978 h;ave, ..... return, the return for the next year cannot be submitted. clause (i) of sub-rule (2) of rule 3 directs that no company shall accept any deposit against unsecurred debenture or any deposit from a shareholder or any deposit guaranteed by any person who, at the time of giving such guarantee is a director of ..... a company, and under the rules, deposits of the kind referred to in rule 3(2)(1) are to be shown in part b .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1981 (HC)

B. Satyanarayana and ors., Etc., Etc. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-05-1981

Reported in : (1982)ILLJ224AP

..... (i) in applying the above tests, it is not very much relevant whether the corporation is created by a statute or is incorporated under a statute, e.g., companies act, societies registration act, etc. the fact that a corporation is a statutory corporation may perhaps be a factor supporting the conclusion of the corporation being an instrumentality or agency of the state ..... g.o. ms. no. 835, industries and commerce department, dated 7th september, 1978. para 2 of the g.o. shows that lidcap was establishment as a government company under the companies act. it is also mentioned in the g.o. that the government would be sanction rs. 6.5 lakhs towards the share capital contribution, the articles of association show that ..... petitioner's case is that the respondent-corporations viz., the andhra pradesh state irrigation development board, and the andhra pradesh leather industries development corporation, though incorporated under the indian companies act, are mere instrumentalities and agencies of the state government and the action taken by them is, in truth and in reality, state action. it goes without saying that, if ..... ...' 28. according to the articles of association, its initial paid-up capital is contributed by the government; any invitation to the public to subscribe for any shares or debentures of the company is prohibited; its directors, including its managing director, are to be appointed and removed by the government; their salaries are fixed by the government; and the chairman of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1981 (HC)

B. Satyanarayana and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-05-1981

Reported in : AIR1981AP125

..... in applying the above tests, it is not very much relevant whether the corporation is created by a statute or is incorporated under a statute; e. g,. companies act, societies registration act, etc. the fact that a corporation is a statutory corporation may perhaps be a factor supporting the conclusion of the corporation being an instrumentality or agency of the ..... , should it be treated as a private function should hindustan aeronautics ltd., which manufactures aeroplanes and other equipment for our armed forces but which is a company incorporated under the companies act, be characterised as a corporation performing a sovereign function, or should it be called a corporation carrying on a commercial activity? it may well be argued ..... petitioners' case is that the respondent-corporations, viz., the andhra pradesh state irrigation development board, and the andhra pradesh leather industries development corporation, though incorporated under the indian companies act, are mere instrumentalities and agencies of the state government and the action taken by them is, in truth and in reality, state action. it goes without saying that, ..... . according to the articles of association, its initial paid-up capital is contributed by the government; any invitation to the public to subscribe for any shares or debentures of the company is prohibited; its directors including its managing director, are to be appointed and removed by the government; their salaries are fixed by the government; and the chairman .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //