Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi agricultural produce marketing regulation act 1976 Page 1 of about 7,750 results (0.207 seconds)

Aug 04 2005 (HC)

Ramesh Industries and ors. Vs. the Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT699; 2005(83)DRJ617

..... to category `b' licenses. it is this decision which has been assailed in these writ petitions.2. the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 was enacted by parliament in order to 'provide for the better regulation of the purchase, sale, storage and processing of agricultural produce and the establishment of market for agricultural produce in the union territory of delhi and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.' under the provisions of this ..... act of 1976, a board was constituted and continued to function for several years. the 1976 act stands repealed on the coming into effect of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1998 on 2nd june, 1999. as is found ..... in most statutes there is a repeal and saving section in the 1998 act, the relevant portion of which reads as follows :124. repeal and saving- (1) the delhi agricultural marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (87 of 1976) (hereinafter referred to as the said act) is hereby repealed.provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1999 (HC)

Okhla Mandi Whole-sale Traders Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Agricu ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi374; 81(1999)DLT3

..... p-7 and p-8 respectively. the said notices relate to the grant of license under the provisions of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and rules framed there under known as delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) (general) rules, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'). the reading of the show-cause notices will ..... committee is stated in paragraph 6 which may be reproduced as follows:'6. that respondent no. 1 is statutory body created under the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 and 'b' category licences are issued to the commission agents for carrying on business of commission agents and the same have to be renewed in ..... indicate that the same were issued in pursuance to the directions as contained in the judgment rendered in c.w.p. no. 72/94 ( fruit & vegetable commission agents wholesale traders association (regd.) and anr. v. agricultural produce marketing ..... the show-cause notice. pending further orders the parties are directed to maintain status quo. cm is disposed of accordingly.'2. respondent no. 1, agricultural produce marketing committee acted in pursuance to the directions of this court as referred to above and filed application under section 151, cpc, c.m. no. 4888/1996, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1984 (HC)

Delhi Administration Vs. Munshi Ram Ram Niwas and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1230; ILR1984Delhi588

..... previously the grant of licenses was governed by the bombay agricultural produce marketing act, 1939 as extended to the union territory of ..... delhi. on the commencement of the act, the said bombay act was repealed. section 2(b) of the act defines 'agricultural produce' means such produce ( ..... known as narela mandi in the union territory of delhi. he had obtained licenses under 'categories 'a' and 'e' issued under rule 12 of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation general) rules, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules') framed under the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). those licenses were issued by the market committee, narela mandi who is the competent authority for the purpose. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 1995 (HC)

Agriculture Produce Market Committee Vs. Potato and Onion Merchant Ass ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT423

..... . (b) the space of the platforms shall be used only by such members of the licensee who are holding valid license granted by the licenser under the provisions of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976. (c) no person shall be allowed to use any part or portion of the platforms hereby licensed, if he is not in possession of a valid license granted by the ..... license expires ................................................................. 5, category of the license granted; i a. 2. b. 3. c 4. d 5. e secretary place: market committee date: (seal of the market committee) conditions of license (1) the licensee shall comply with the provisions of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 and rules and bye-laws framed there under and instructions issued from time to time. (2) he shall not permit evasion ..... against the appellant. by order dated 22.8.94, the learned single judge held that the license given by the appellant-market committee to the respondent-merchants association dated 1.4.79, fell under section 34 of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter called the act) and could have, thereforee, been revoked only after giving opportunity under section 35(3). as no such opportunity was given .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1996 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT682

..... no. f.i/7/81-dam, dated 6 october, 1993, whereunder the petitioners were nominated as non-official members of the delhi agricultural marketing board (for short the board) under section 5(l)(b) of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the act), for a period of three years. the effect of the impugned notification was that the petitioners stood removed from the membership of ..... the board with immediate effect. (3) initially in cwp no. 593/94 there were only two respondents viz. the lt. governor of delhi-respondent no. i and the ..... and to appreciate the controversy these may briefly be stated as follows : the act came into force on 5 november, 1976 with the object to provide for the better regulation of the purchase, sale, storage and processing of the agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for the agricultural produce in the union territory of delhi and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. to achieve this object. section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 1994 (HC)

Potato and Onion Merchants Association Vs. Chairman, Delhi Agricultura ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)1437; 56(1994)DLT547; 1994(30)DRJ657

..... till date. the defendants issued an order dated 14.6.94 in exercise of the powers contained-in sub-section 2(e) of sec.25 of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as marketing act'), it was ordered that the actual occupant of the poma sheds whose names were indicated in paragraph 7 under column no.4 of the said order shall ..... that the members of the poma has been granted license in terms of sec.34 of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976. sections 34 and 35 of the marketing act are as under:- sec.34: 'grant of licenses (1) subject to rules made in this behalf, a market committee may after making such inquiries as it deems fit, grant or renew a license for the ..... license; (c) if the holder of the license in combination with other holders of licenses commits any act or abstains from carrying out his normal business in the market with the intention of willfully obstructing, suspending or stopping the marketing of agricultural produce in the market area; (d) if the holder of the license has been adjudged an insolvent, and has not obtained ..... his discharge; or (e) if the holder of the license is convicted of any offence under this act. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1) but subject to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 26 1995 (TRI)

Agricultural Produce Marketing Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1996)57ITD109(Delhi)

..... the assessee stated in reply dated 28-3-1994 that as per section 38(4)(vii) of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976, the delhi agricultural marketing board is required to give aid to financially weak market committees in the shape of loans or grants or both and that in that sense the assessee was also ..... the learned counsel invited our attention to the preamble of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976, which provides that the legislation is for better regulation of purchase, sale, storage and processing of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural produce in the union territory of delhi and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.the learned counsel ..... the assessee came into existence as a result of enactment of delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976, which was enacted to provide for better regulation of the purchase, sales, storage and processing of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural produce in the union territory of delhi and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. it was ..... municipal corpn. or village panchayat, that it was not a local authority in the true sense, that under section 9 of the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 certain members were to be elected by the agriculturists and certain members were to be nominated by the administrator representing agriculturists from adjoining states .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 2006 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Azadpur Vs. Cit and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Del)1; [2007]294ITR549(Delhi)

..... azadpur, sabzi mandi, delhi apart from performing other functions and duties such as superintendence, direction and control of markets for regulating marketing of agricultural produce. for the assessment year 200203, the appellant committee ..... appellant marketing committee is not a 'local authority' within the meaning of section 10(20) of the income tax act, 1961 ?2. the question arises in the following backdrop 3. the appellant committee is established under the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 which is now replaced by the delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1998. the provisions of the said act enjoin upon the appellant to provide facilities for marketing of agricultural produce in ..... authority within the meaning of section 10(20) of the it act, 1961 read with section 3(31) of the general clauses act, 1897. the decision is reported in cit v. agricultural marketing produce committee : [2001]250itr369(delhi) , the conclusion drawn by this court was based on a conspectus of the provisions contained in delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 and a comparison of the said provisions with those contained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2013 (HC)

Shri Devinder Singh Dabbas and ors. Vs. the Administrator of Union Ter ...

Court : Delhi

..... committee (constituted by the board) on 1.2.1986 for the purposes of completing the formality of obtaining approval of the competent authority as required under the provision of delhi agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1976 and rules made thereunder. thee said committee vide its panel also recommended the names of the respondents 5 to 8 and consequently vide orders dated 24.7.1986 the ..... hand were initially appointed as fee collectors on adh-hoc/daily wages basis on 1.1.1979 and 1.5.1980 respectively. later on vide the resolution no.7 of agricultural produce market committee, narela approved in its meeting held on 29.1.1980 the regularization of services of these employees. the chairman of the committee issued appointment order(s) on ..... accordance with the rules. (v) rules which were applicable to the respondent no.3 when the respondent nos. 5 to 8 and the petitioners were appointed were the delhi agricultural market committee (service) regulations, 1978.5. in law, any employer, which is a state as per article 12 of the constitution of india, in order to regularize the services of its employees ..... of delhi & ors. ...... respondents through: mr. shyam moorjhani, advocate. coram: honble mr. justice valmiki j.mehta to be referred to the reporter or not? valmiki j.mehta, j (oral) 1. this writ petition is filed by 5 petitioners. the 5 petitioners were appointed on 4.11.1985 as fee collectors/auction recorders with the respondent no.3-the narela agricultural produce marketing .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1996 (HC)

Naresh Chand JaIn and Sons. Vs. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territo ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 64(1996)DLT88

..... on behalf of the respondents it is stated that in the year 1986 in the new grain market, najafgarh, 99 plots/shops were developed for allotment to categories 'a' and 'b' license holders. in the meeting held on 21.8.1986, the 'delhi agricultural produce marketing board' had taken a decision that the existing commission agents and the whole-sale dealers, working ..... in the market yard of existing grain market at najafgarh be considered for allotment of developed plots in the new grain market at haibetpur, najafgarh and that the average annual turn over of the ..... article 226 of the constitution of india assailing the decision of the delhi agricultural marketing board denying the allotment of the shop to the petitioner in the grain market at najafgarh. the case of the petitioner, briefly stated, is that the petitioner has been marketing and dealing in the business of agricultural produce since 1981 under a valid license from respondent no. 3 which ..... 20.1.1986 along with other licensees, the petitioner also applied for allotment of shop/plot in the market developed by respondent no. 3. (2) it is further alleged that respondent no. 2 in the meantime developed one more site for marketing agriculture produce in the same locality by name' new anaj mandi, najafgarh' and by means of a separate notification .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //