Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dharma hindu law Court: union territory consumer disputes redressal commission ut chandigarh Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.022 seconds)

Jan 25 2000 (TRI)

Lt. Col. (Dr.) Riptinder Singh Vs. the Director, Housing and Urban Dev ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

..... the complainant. 13. on behalf of the complainant our attention has also been drawn to haryana urban development authority and ors. v. ranjan dhamina, 118 (1998-1) plr. the punjab law reporter, where the supreme court held that where there was no such material to show that there had been any further work of development on the land in question, enhancing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2000 (TRI)

Life Insurance Corporation of India Through Senior Divisional Manager ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Oct-10-2000

dr. p.k. vasudeva, member: 1. smt. kavita vinayak had filed a complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act saying that she is wife of the deceased rakesh vinayak who had two policies of l.i.c. of india for the sum of rs. 50,000/- and rs. 1,00,000/- from 15.5.1988 for 20 years and from 15.2.1994 for 25 years respectively. she had claimed that due to deficiency in service on the part of the respondent, the complainant had suffered great monetary loss, physical harassment and mental agony, besides mental embarrassment at the hands of the respondent for which she is entitled to claim a sum of rs. 1,50,000/- being the amount under the claim and also a compensation of rs. 50,000/- for the irreparable loss suffered by her. the district forum-ii, u.t., chandigarh vide its judgment dated 17.5.2000 has allowed the complaint with costs rs. 1,100/- and directed the opposite party to pay the amount due to the complainant under the aforesaid policy along with the interest @ 12% per annum from the date the claim was repudiated, i.e. 10.9.1996 till payment. aggrieved against this order, the respondent has preferred this appeal. 2. the respondent/complainant averred in her complaint that her husband late shri r.p. vinayak aged about 40 years got two policies of the appellant for getting his life insured. the details of these policies are given below :sum assuredw.e.f.plan no.termpremiummode of paymentpolicy 50,000/-15.5.19887520 1,679.30yearly160120167rs. 1,00,000 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 2000 (TRI)

R.P. Bedi Vs. Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : May-10-2000

..... impleaded nor it is known here as to what was the price paid at the time of allotment and since there are a large number of questions of fact and law and as observed above, the complainant is not a consumer, the relief of declaration or refund of part of bid money deposited and interest etc. is not maintainable here. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //