Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dharma hindu law Year: 2000 Page 14 of about 2,509 results (0.203 seconds)

Jul 14 2000 (HC)

Manav Hitkari Sangh Vs. Rajkumar Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-14-2000

Reported in : (2002)IVLLJ809Raj; 2001(1)WLC618

..... the powers not only of the control, management & administration, but also corresponding powers for creation and abolition of the posts. moreover, from a bareperusal of its bye laws, it is crystal clear that though the petitioner society is registered under the rajasthan societies registration act, 1958 but it is totally private institute having its own funds for ..... to follow the principles of natural justice before dispensing with services of its employees, inasmuch as the executive committee had no jurisdiction vested in it under its bye-laws to dispense with services of the plainliff notwithstanding its resolution taken in its meeting date 23.4.1998. in these circumstances, shri gupta submitted that the appellate court ..... duringpendency of the suit, hence, this revision petition.(10). shri amod kasliwal, learned counsel for the petitioner society vehemently contended that the appellate court has gravely erred in law in granting injunction in favour of the plaintiff on his second ti application after allowing amendment in the plaint for adding prayer seeking relief of declaration, without considering the ..... the plaintiff by registered posts, whereupon, the plaintiff instituted a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the petitioner society (defendant) from terminating his services without following due process of law. aiongwith the suit, temporary injunction was also sought by filing an application under order 39 rules 1 & 2 cpc.(6), upon notices of the suit and aforesaid t. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2000 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. J.P. Goal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-14-2000

Reported in : [2001]247ITR555(Cal)

..... explained before the commissioner of income-tax in proceedings under section 132(11) that the cash was drawn from goel industries, afirm in which the assessee-hindu undivided family was a partner, on september 5, 1980, for payment to bishan dayal goel of steel trading company for supplied. the amount was received ..... 263 it is explained that the silver bars are assessed by the assessing officer in the hands of the wife of the karta of the assessee-hindu undivided family for the assess-merit year 1981-82, though the assessee claimed before the assessing officer that the source of the silver bars or ..... the cash was received its source has been explained, the creditors have been examined and they have confirmed the loan to goel industries, wherein the assessee-hindu undivided family is one of the partners.6. the assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year under appeal disclosing a total income of ..... that the karta of the assessee had got his wife's jewellery given at the time of marriage, melted at delhi through his father-in-law and had kept the primary gold thus obtained with him for the purpose of making new jewellery at calcutta. in the summary order passed under section ..... referred at the instance of the revenue reads as under :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was justified in law in setting aside the order of the commissioner of income-tax under section 263 of the income-tax act, 1961, and restoring the original assessment order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2000 (TRI)

Tarsen Kansil Vs. Dev Spinners Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Reported in : (2001)103CompCas835

..... impugned shares.6. shri virendra ganda, learned counsel for the respondent, has at the very outset contended that the question involved in this petition cannot be decided by the company law board (clb) in the exercise of its discretionary and summary jurisdiction as not only does it involve highly disputed questions but serious allegations also regarding fraud and forgery. in support ..... . cylinders private ltd. [1999] 95 comp cas 555 (clb) ; [1999] 32 cla 47.7. this controversy with regard to the scope of jurisdiction of the company court (now the company law board) in respect of rectification of the share members register has now been set at rest by the apex court in ammonia supplies corporation private ltd. v. modern plastic containers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2000 (TRI)

Eastern Gases Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Durgapur

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Decided on : Sep-22-2000

Reported in : (2002)125STC450Tribunal

..... applied remain essentially the same commercial article, it cannot be said that the final product is the result of manufacture. again, in the case of deputy commissioner of sales tax (law), board of revenue (taxes), ernakulam v. pio food packers [1980] 46 stc 63, the supreme court has observed that it is only when a change or a series of changes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2000 (TRI)

Abex Corpn. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jun-22-2000

Reported in : (2001)78ITD235(Hyd.)

..... held that: "the presumption against retrospective operation is not applicable to declaratory statutes. a declaratory act may be defined as an act to remove doubts existing as to the common law, or the meaning or effect of any statute. such acts are usually held to be retrospective. the usual reason for passing a declaratory act is to set aside what parliament ..... deems to have been a judicial error, whether in the statement of the common law or in the interpretation of statutes. an explanatory act is generally passed to supply an obvious omission or to clear up doubts as to the meaning of the previous act ..... . it is well settled that (if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law, retrospective operation is generally intended)." as far as the present case on hand is concerned, rule 115a of the income-tax rules is also a declaratory act which stands on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2000 (TRI)

Abex Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Jun-22-2000

..... held that: "the presumption against retrospective operation is not applicable to declaratory statutes. a declaratory act may be defined as an act to remove doubts existing as to the common law, or the meaning or effect of any statute. such acts are usually held to be retrospective. the usual reason for passing a declaratory act is to set aside what parliament ..... deems to have been a judicial error, whether in the statement of the common law or in the interpretation of statutes. an explanatory act is generally passed to supply an obvious omission or to clear up doubts as to the meaning of the previous act ..... . it is well settled that (if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law, retrospective operation is generally intended)" as far as the present case on hand is concerned, rule 115a of the it rules is also a declaratory act which stands on par .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2000 (TRI)

G. Venkatareddy and Co. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-20-2000

Reported in : (2001)73TTJ(Hyd.)401

..... to the effect that the factum of repayment was the pointer to the genuineness of the loan transactions.therefore, keeping in view the entire material placed before us and the law position as enunciated by honble calcutta high court in the cases relied upon by the learned commissioner (appeals) and by us supra, we are of the considered view that assessing ..... credits appear in the books of account. section 68 has come to be considered in very many judgments before various high courts and before honble supreme court. it is settled law that it was necessary for the assessee to prove prima facie the transactions which results in cash credits in his books of account. three ingredients will have to be satisfied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2000 (HC)

Pramod Kumar Jha Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-06-2000

..... in the disbursement of the jamanbandi bonds ten years ago, no departmental proceedings drawn up for such a long tenure. petitioner's suspension all of a sudden was bad in law and quashed. here also, according to earned counsel present suspension order is for an occurrence which is nearly six years old. as such, according to learned counsel, in view of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2000 (HC)

Gowri Shankar Finance Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-27-2000

Reported in : (2001)166CTR(Kar)137; [2001]248ITR713(KAR); [2001]248ITR713(Karn); [2001]116TAXMAN375(Kar)

..... these findings, the tribunal dismissed the appeals. thereafter on an application made by the assessee under section 256(1) of the act, the tribunal has referred, the three questions of law already reproduced in the earlier part of the judgment to this court for its opinion along with the statement of case.6. question no. 1: counsel for the assessee argued ..... ashok bhan, j.1. the income-tax appellate tribunal, bangalore bench (for short, 'the tribunal'), has referred the following three questions of law under section 256(1) of the income-tax act, 1961 (for short 'the act'), at the instance of the assessee to this court for its opinion along with the statement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2000 (HC)

B. Parimala and ors. Vs. Riyaz Ahmed and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-06-2000

Reported in : ILR2001KAR1443

..... at best the loss the family will be the share of the deceased and not the entire income. the punjab high court held as follows:'the hindu undivided family which owned the concern considered of the deceased, his wife and the minor children of very tender age. it is therefore, apparent that ..... account in assessing loss to the dependents; and (ii) the immoveable property and other income yielding assets inherited by the dependents under the appropriate law of succession are not benefits accruing by reason of the death of the deceased.'20. there is a difference between an income earned by a ..... the benefit of the partnership business 'by reason of the death' of mohammed basheer. they always possessed it.'the court, after, referring to relevant case law, proceeded to formulate the following two principles:'(i) the income from a business establishment for which the deceased was solely responsible, is lost to the estate ..... -17.1) in helen c. rebello (supra), the supreme court held thus:'so far as the general principle of estimating damages under the common law is concerned, it is settled that the pecuniary loss can be ascertained only by balancing on one hand, the loss to the claimant of the ..... in inadequate. they contend that the deduction of rs. two lakhs from the compensation, on account of receipt of life insurance amount, is contrary to law. they also contend that the loss of dependency calculated by taking the contribution by the deceased as rs. 3,000/- per month is erroneous. according .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //