Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Court: delhi Page 1 of about 91 results (0.080 seconds)

Apr 23 2002 (HC)

Jai Bhagwan and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VIIAD(Delhi)644; 99(2002)DLT696; 2002(63)DRJ580

..... under-mentioned cases for the purpose of better cultivation of lands herein and in exercise f the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (east punjab act no. 50 of 1948) as extended to the union territory of delhi, the ltd. governor of the national capital territory of delhi is pleased to declare his intention to make a ..... purposes of the village. 4. the said act was extended to the union territory of delhi by an appropriate notification ..... number, are residents of village khera kalan, delhi and hold bhoomidari rights in respect of agricultural land. they are said to be members of the gaon sabha of the said village. 3. east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was enacted to provide for the compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings and for presenting fragmentation of agricultural holdings in the state of punjab and for assignment or reservation of land for common .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1972 (HC)

Suraj Mal and anr. Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi1016

..... them from taking possession of any land of the plaintiff in pursuance of the said order of the chief commissioner. consolidation proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, herein after referred to as the consolidation act, were ordered in 1952. a scheme of consolidation of holdings was prepared but by an order passed in 1954 the chief commissioner ordered fresh revaluation of the land in the village ..... advantageous first to read certain relevant provisions of the consolidation act and the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation )rules, 1949, hereinafter called the consolidation rules, as applicable in delhi and also to read some of the relevant provisions of the punjab land revenue act, 1887. (5) it will also be necessary to appreciate the scheme of the consolidation act and the consolidation rules so as to understand the respective rights and ..... obligations of the parties in consolidation proceeding. the relevant provisions of the consolidation act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2007 (HC)

Rajdhani Park Kalyan Karini Samiti Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT226; 2007(97)DRJ38

..... the financial commissioner dismissing case no. 119/1986, a revision petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('holdings act'). by the impugned order the financial commissioner affirmed the order dated 7.4.1986 passed by the settlement officer (consolidation) which order has been challenged by the rajdhani park kalyan karini samiti in the first mentioned ..... 7 of the said writ petition which reads as under:that the consolidation proceedings went on for years before the consolidation officer and without applying with the provisions of east punjab holdings and prevention of fragmentation act, the respondent no. 1 has prepared a scheme of the consolidation of holding of village mundka and under the said scheme the land of the ..... no. 6 and whether they formed part of the disputed lands.(vii) finally it was pointed out that the object of the holdings act being prevention of fragmentation, the present petitions if allowed would result in further fragmentation. it was prayed that the writ petitions ought to be thereforee dismissed.19. appearing on behalf of respondent no. 4 trust ..... transferee of the right would be entitled to make a claim before the consolidation officer. the expression 'land owner' not having been defined in the holdings act, recourse has to be taken punjab land revenue act 1887.40. the expression 'land owner' under the punjab land revenue act reads as under:(2) 'land-owner' does not include a tenant or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2006 (HC)

Sahib Singh Vs. the Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 137(2007)DLT111; 2006(92)DRJ29

..... in the present writ petition. we may first examine the relevant provisions of the dlra and the consolidation act.the legal position under the consolidation act11. as regards the compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings, the relevant statute is the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('consolidation act') under which schemes for consolidation of agricultural holdings are prepared and individual land holders are allowed to have their khatas joint or separate and also allotment ..... s. muralidhar, j.1. this writ petition seeks the quashing of (a) an order dated 20.4.2000 passed by the consolidation officer, respondent no. 3, under section 21(2) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('consolidation act') and (b) and order dated 23.5.2000 passed by the financial commissioner, respondent no. 2, dismissing the petitioner's revision petition against the order of respondent no ..... of land at a price fixed in the scheme itself. the consolidation act is consistent with the dlra although the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 1997 (HC)

Umed Singh Vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 69(1997)DLT957

..... estate right holder, in village bamnolli, new delhi, has sought the quashing of notification issued by respondent no. 2 under the provisions of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, as applicable to delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'the consolidation act') and the consolidation of holding proceedings, which are in progress in village bamnolli; to restrain respondents i and 2 from continuing the proceedings and affecting the re-partition ..... under section 21 of the act and to quash rule 6 of the delhi holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1959, as amended by the (amendment) rules, 1996 ..... after the issuance of the notification under section 507 of the delhi municipal corporation act and the so called notification under section 12 of the delhi development act. (9) rule 6 of the delhi holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1956 stood amended by rule 4 of the delhi holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) (amendment) rules, 1996 by virtue of which clause (j)of the principal rules stood .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2002 (HC)

Gian Chand Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(66)DRJ566

..... consolidation committees were constituted in 1996. the consolidation scheme in respect of both the villages was prepared in 1996 and 1998. it is alleged that the petitioner is complicity with other revenue ..... the cr.p.c. a case under section 13(1)(d) of prevention of corruption act and section 120b ipc has been registered against him. the petitioner has working as a consolidation officer of village kanjhawata & pooth khurd, delhi in june, 1996. notification under section 14(1) of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was issued in 1988 and 1993 in respect of these villages and the ..... or the residential plots and how many of them were sanctioned such plots. accusation is made in ignorance of the provision of the east punjab holding (consolidation and prevention fragmentation) act which has provided elaborate mechanism for preparation of the scheme for consolidation of the holding and redressal of the grievances. the provision of a 100 feet wide road was made on the demand of the village advisory committee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1991 (HC)

Amar Singh and anr. Vs. Jai Parkash and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi267; 44(1991)DLT198

..... 14.10.83 between afool chand etc. v. charon singh and that of the director of consolidation/financial commissioner delhi in case no. 380/83-ca decided on 3.7.86 under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act) is null and void, illegal and in-operative qua the rights of the plaintiffs in ..... think the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners has great force. in the aforesaid authority, it was held, 'in the proviso to section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, it has been laid down that the power of varying or reversing an order, scheme or repartition, is to be exercised only after the fulfillment of the ..... statement in which they also took up a preliminary objection that the suit was barred under section 44 of the act. the trial court framed the following preliminary issue : (1)whether suit is barred by section 44 of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (4) it came to the conclusion that the suit was not barred by section 44 of the ..... act because serious allegations had been against the revenue authorities. (5) i have heard arguments advanced by learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2007 (HC)

Surjan Singh and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT123

..... , under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioners question orders made by the financial commissioner in consolidation proceedings, in terms of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation ) act, 1948, as extended to delhi (called 'the act') in village mundka, delhi started in 1975. a scheme of consolidation was drawn up inviting applications for residential plots in the extended lal dora within thirty days from 1.4 ..... .76. the scheme was published and was confirmed by the settlement officer (consolidation) on 26.7.1976. in terms of ..... judgment reported as rajinder singh v. financial commissioner, delhi : 122(2005)dlt151 as follows:the act was passed to provide for the consolidation of agricultural holdings and for preventing the fragmentation of agricultural holdings in the state of punjab. it was extended to delhi. chapter iii of the act deals with consolidation of holdings and it is provided by section 14 that the government may either suo motu, or on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2007 (HC)

Om Parkash and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(95)DRJ289

..... the petitioners.2. the facts leading to the filing of this petition are that on 22.3.1953 a notification was issued under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 ('act') in respect of the estate of village mundka. the right holders were asked to make the demands for allotment of plots in the extended laldora between april ..... the petitioners herein made demands for allotment of plots in the extended laldora on 14th,15th and 16th april 1976. the petitioners are petty land holders. their total holding before the consolidation operation was a little less than three and a half bighas. in fact, they were joint khatedars with others. shri deep chand, deceased father of petitioners 1 ..... had to surrender out of his own agricultural land. in dealing with such rights of individual right holders it was incumbent upon the settlement officer (consolidation) to scrutinise the applications before him by holding proper enquiry about each of right holder concerned separately and then pass speaking orders relating to every individual case specifying cogent reasons for its acceptance ..... financial commissioner, delhi who by the impugned order dated 21.5.1991 allowed the said revision petition holding that the consolidation officer had misread and misinterpreted the order dated 9.9.1986 of his predecessor. accordingly the order dated 10.9.1990 of the consolidation officer was set aside. 12. shri o.n. vohra, learned senior counsel appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2011 (HC)

Chand Ram and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... in the petition require a lot of investigation of facts including into the records as to consolidation. it has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioners as to whether the remedy of a revision petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 would not be a proper remedy for making the grievances as made in the present writ ..... petition. it is felt that the financial commissioner in exercise of powers under section 42 of the act is better equipped to go into and answer the questions as ..... 40 years has not been concluded as yet. they further claim that they are still in possession of their pre- consolidation holdings. 2. the petitioners themselves have in the writ petition disclosed an earlier round of litigation relating to the consolidation proceedings in the village. one mr. sarup singh and others had filed w.p.(c) no.4144/1998. from ..... of 1972 having remained unimplemented. if the financial commissioner on examination of the records of consolidation finds that the consolidation in fact stood concluded and there is no merit in the averments of the petitioners, then the same would entail finality under section 24 of the act. moreover, if that be so, it will be seen that the scheme was under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //