Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 80 results (0.395 seconds)

Mar 28 1967 (SC)

Johrimal Vs. Director of Consolidation of Holdings, Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1568; (1967)69PLR824; [1967]3SCR286

..... acting under s. 20 of the act. the scheme, among other things, provided that the owners of permanent ..... appeal is brought, by certificate, from the judgment of the punjab high court dated november 8, 1960, in letters patent appeal no. 284 of 1956. 2. for the consolidation of land holdings in village kheowara, a scheme was prepared by the consolidation officer under s. 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, (act l of 1948), hereinafter called the 'act', and the scheme was confirmed by the settlement officer ..... of the full bench was that the impugned order amounted to an alteration of the consolidation scheme and the state government had power, under s. 42 of the act as amendment by the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) (second amendment and validation) act (punjab act 27 of 1960), to make any change in the consolidation scheme subject to the requirements of that section. the present appeal is brought by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 1962 (SC)

Roop Chand Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC1503; (1963)65PLR576; [1963]Supp(1)SCR539

..... will be entitled to the costs of this petition.kapur, j.25. the decision of this case depends upon the construction of two provisions of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, (punj. 50 of 1948), hereinafter termed 'the act'; those provisions are sections 21(4) and 42. the former section confers on the state government appellate powers and the latter the power to call for ..... sarkar, j.1. this petition under art. 32 of the constitution asks for a writ quashing an order purported to have been made under s. 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. it is said that the order was entirely without jurisdiction and if allowed to stand, it would deprive the petitioner of certain lands and so wrongly affect his fundamental rights ..... an officer and as he is appointed under this act and has to perform duties relating to administration of this act, he must be held to be an officer under this act.' falshaw, j., as also bishan narain, j., were dealing with the pepsu holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act. this act however contained the same provisions as the act now before us though the sections were numbered differently .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1964 (SC)

Ranjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC632; (1965)0PLR563; [1965]1SCR82

..... mehnd of tehsil hansi in district hissar. proceedings for the consolidation of holdings are going on in these villages under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 (act 50 of 1948). this act was amended on many occasions but we are concerned with it as amended by the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) (2nd amendment & validation) act (27 of 1960). in the present consolidation proceedings portions of lands from those commonly owned by the ..... have relevance and mention some of the cases decided under them one of which led to the second amendment act. 2. the consolidation act (50 of 1948) was passed to provide for the compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings and for preventing the fragmentation of agricultural holdings. section 18 of the act provided that notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, it shall be lawful for ..... any consolidation officer to direct inter alia : '(a) that any land specifically assigned for any common purpose shall cease to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1965 (SC)

Harbhajan Singh Vs. Karam Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC641; [1966]1SCR817

..... in letter patent appeal no. 128 of 1960. 2. in the year 1955, consolidation proceedings under east punjab holdings [consolidation and prevention of fragmentation] act, 1948 [hereinafter called the act] were started in the village bholpur of district ludhiana. in accordance with the provisions of the act, a scheme for consolidation of holding was published on 29th march 1956. on 14th may 1956 that scheme was confirmed ..... under s. 20 of the act. the consolidation officer accordingly re allotted parcels of land ..... on 29th august, 1958. 3. it appears that harbhajan singh had filed two copies of the application under s. 42 of the act.and on one copy the director of consolidation of holdings passed an order on 17th february, 1958 that the application should be put up with previous papers. onthe second copy of the application ..... application of harbhajan singh and set aside the order of the assistant director. respondent no. 1 thereafter moved the punjab high court under art. 226 of the constitution for quashing the order of the director, consolidation of holding made on 29th august, 1958. the application was allowed by the high court on 11th august january, 1960 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1994 (SC)

Swaran Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC2301; JT1994(3)SC203; (1994)108PLR206; 1994(2)SCALE557; (1994)3SCC544; 1994(1)LC678(SC)

..... authority while deciding a dispute of title between the persons claiming to be the owners and the gram panchayat in respect of shamlat deh under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('act', for short)? according to the averments, the appellants claim to have been cultivating the land as lessees which, land has been described in the revenue records as shamlat deh ..... .p.as. filed by them were also dismissed by the high court. since a common question arises, all these appeals are being disposed of together.4. the act provides for the compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings and preventing the fragmentation of agricultural holdings in the state of punjab and for the assignment or reservation of land for common purposes of the village. under section 14 of the ..... act, the government may of its own accord agree or on application declare its intention to make a scheme for consolidation of holdings. section 16 lays down that the scheme prepared .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2003 (SC)

Mange Ram Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC807; 2003(1)AWC667(SC); JT2003(1)SC135; 2003(1)SCALE66; (2003)2SCC1

..... in village sanoth was prepared and confirmed in the year 1975-76 under sections 19 and 20 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'). the respondents admittedly owned and possessed lands in the said village. the appellant claimed that his predecessor had trespassed on a portion of the land belonging to the respondents ..... of the appellant was rejected. this argument is again misplaced as it is factually not correct. in that other case of chander etc., they had been allotted land in the consolidation proceedings. delivery of possession was held up because of legal proceedings involving that very case. thus, the facts of the two cases are entirely different.5. looking from another ..... appellant cannot succeed.3. secondly, this appeal must fail on account of long delay and laches on the part of the appellant in approaching the authorities for relief. the consolidation proceedings in the village admittedly concluded in the year 1982. the appellant himself relies on a list dated 3rd july, 1982 for purposes of basing his claim to a piece ..... appellant made an application on 16th february, 1993 for being put in possession of the 5 biswas of land to which he claimed to be entitled to an encumbrancer. the consolidation officer however dismissed the application of the appellant vide order dated 10th november, 1993. the financial commissioner dismissed the revision petition against the said order on 4th march, 1994. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 1977 (SC)

Padam Nabh Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC2001; (1977)79PLR715; (1977)4SCC1; 1977(9)LC483(SC)

..... to as the act, declaring its intention for the preparation of a scheme of consolidation of holdings for the better cultivation of village tripari. the additional director, consolidation of holdings, issued an order on october 15, 1973, reserving same land for the purpose ..... of the punjab and haryana high court dated november 27, 1975, upholding the dismissal of their writ petition. the fact leading upto the controversy in this court are quite simple, and may be shortly stated. 2. a notification was issued by the state government on november 24, 1972, under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, hereinafter referred ..... for which land has been reserved by the order of the additional director of consolidation dated october 15, 1973 will be 'a source of great convenience and benefit to the villagers' the high court has stated that the road in question will not ..... petition, so that there is no real basis for raising the new argument in this court. the high court has noticed the definition of 'common purpose' in the act, which includes any purpose in relation to any common need, convenience or benefit of the village in respect of 'village roads'. it has held that the proposed road .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2005 (SC)

Bagirath Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3672; JT2005(8)SC296; (2005)7SCC556

..... partition scheme framed by the consolidation authorities in respect of the three villages in question was not in accordance ..... and change of possession of land effected. 6. the consolidation scheme came to be challenged by one sultan singh before the deputy commissioner, karnal exercising powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the consolidation act'). invoking his revisional jurisdiction it was contended that re- ..... with law. in particular the petitioner challenged the propriety and legality of paragraph 11 of part vi of the consolidation ..... was sought to be challenged by some of the land holders by filing another application under section 42 of the consolidation act, the same was rejected by the director consolidation holding that the scheme framed in accordance with the direction of the high court and which was upheld by the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1977 (SC)

Chet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC1494; (1977)79PLR490; (1977)2SCC499; [1977]3SCR369; 1977(9)LC345(SC)

..... attend due to illness, over which he had no control, was accepted by the additional director, who proceeded to exercise his powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and to set right the grievance of the applicant, gurdev singh, after going into all the relevant records. the learned judge of the high court, who ..... appeal under article 136 of the constitution is directed against a very detailed judgment of the punjab and haryana high court on a writ petition no. 1875 of 1965 filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution, assailing an order of the additional director consolidation of holdings, passed on 8 june, 1965. a perusal of that order, together with the earlier order of ..... 4 may, 1965 and the application for restoration dated 15 may, 1965, filed by gurdev singh, respondent no. 3, shows; gurdev singh, who had some complaint against the consolidation scheme, was not present so that petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1989 (SC)

Gram Panchayat, Village Kanonda Vs. Director, Consolidation of Holding ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC763; JT1989(4)SC357; 1989(2)SCALE914; 1989Supp(2)SCC465; [1989]Supp1SCR576

..... of 1948), hereinafter referred to as 'the act'. the panchayat, therefore, moved an application under section 42 of the act on 20-9-1977 for setting aside the scheme, objecting to the utilisation of the land of value of -/2/- (two ..... , consolidation of holdings dated 8-2-1979.2. the appellant gram panchayat, here-in after referred to at the 'panchayat', was the owner of 1200 bighas of land in village kanonda, tehsil bahadurgarh, district rohtak. a scheme of consolidation of holdings, hereinafter referred to as 'the scheme', of the village was confirmed on 15-1-1974 under section 20 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (50 ..... after the commencement of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) second amendment and validation act, 1962 may within 60 days of that order appeal to the assistant director of consolidation and under sub-section (5) any appeal against an order of the settlement ' officer (consolidation) pending under sub-section (4) immediately before the commencement of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) second amendment and validation act, 1962, either before the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //