Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Page 10 of about 525 results (0.050 seconds)

Dec 06 2004 (HC)

Shri Shivinder Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT468; 2005(80)DRJ433

..... land. fortunately it relates to its location. consolidation took place in village mitraon. east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 governs consolidation and repartition of holdings in deli. scheme of consolidation framed under section 20 of the act required that lands abutting the mottled `dhasa' road (also called najafgarh road) were to be treated as compact block and holding allotted to the land holder as it is. ..... (south) (o-06) and allotted him 17 biswa of land comprised in khasra no. 3/13 (east) withdrawn from the petitioner. the consolidation officer also affected changes in the holdings of a few other land holdings.8. aggrieved by change of his holding, mahinder singh filed a revision before the financial commissioner. his grievance was that while implementing order dated 9. ..... the building plans and also the same would also be in violation of the policy and the scheme of consolidation under the act which provide that every chak holder must be provided access from the main road to their respective holdings. moreover, if the petitioner is restored the western portion of the rectangle no. 63/2 which had also ..... stands accepted.'7. petitioner moved an application on 25.9.1985 before the consolidation officer for correction of the revenue record. on 28.1.1986, the consolidation officer passed an order. he withdraw 17 biswa of land from khasra no. 3/13 (east) from the holding of the petitioner and allotted him 17 biswa of land in khasra no. 63 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1972 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Sarmukh Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H463

..... rectangle no. 47 of the revenue estate of sureshwala, tehsil fazilka, district ferozepore. consolidation proceedings started in this village when a notification under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) was issued on april 12, 1960. the scheme of consolidation was finally published on january 15, 1961. it was confirmed under section 20(3) ..... of the act on february 21, 1961. a scheme of repartition under section 21(1) of the act was published on april 11, ..... support was sought from a division bench judgment of this court in sadha singh v. state of punjab, ilr (1968) 1 punj 378, which, in turn, purports to apply the principle settled by the full bench in deep chand v. addl. director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, ilr (1964) 1 punj 665=(air 1964 punj 249 (fb)).6. in deep chand's ..... case, ilr (1964) 1 punj 665=(air 1964 punj 249 (fb))(ibid) the full bench ruled that the additional director consolidation or any other judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal has no inherent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2008 (HC)

NaraIn Singh and anr. Vs. Financial Commissioner

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ122

..... territory of delhi and ors. reported in : 69(1997)dlt957 . the court in this case was considering the applicability of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 and the rules framed there under after issue of notification under section 507 of the act by which the village was declared to be an urbanized village. another contention raised by the petitioners therein was with reference to ..... section 12 of the delhi development act, 1957 as the area in question had been declared to be a development area. ..... would continue to remain agricultural land and will not affect its status. consequently, it cannot have any effect on the on going process of consolidation, which is being carried out under a valid piece of legislation, namely, consolidation act, the object of which is to provide for better cultivation of land within the estate concerned.37. section 150(3)(e) of the ..... by mr. maman singh to the petitioners by two sale deeds dated 4th may, 1989 had resulted in violation of section 33 of the reforms act as mr. maman singh was left with uneconomic holding in form of land in extended abadi located in khasra no. 23/18/2 measuring 1 bigha 7 bids was and, thereforee, consequences as stipulated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2011 (HC)

Kashmiri Lal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

..... of the impugned order dated 9th november, 2010, we are not inclined to issue notice in the present appeal. consolidation proceedings in village burari started in the year 1970 and repartition under section 21(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (act, for short) as extended to delhi was carried out in july-august, 1974. the repartition proceedings thereafter were ..... confirmed on 17th june, 1975 and objections were invited and resolution no. 26 dated 18th june, 1975 was passed. consolidation proceedings came to an end in june, 1982.4 ..... order dated 9th november, 2010 in which the learned single judge has referred to 1996 amendment to the rule 6(j)(i) of the delhi holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1959 (rules for short). it is pointed out that in the present case, the said amendment was not applicable as the ..... . a total area of 5 bighas 17 biswas which was the pre- consolidation holding of smt. tara wanti and sh. ho ram. consolidation proceedings were initiated on 8th april, 1974 after the scheme was confirmed through resolution no. 14. during consolidation proceedings, new khasra nos. were givenand the holdings of each khata was also evaluated. khasra no. 122/5 (3-1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2003 (HC)

Surat Singh Vs. Additional Director and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)134PLR579

..... for quashing of impugned order dated august 27, 1985 (annexure p-4) passed by the additional director, consolidation, jalandhar.2. the petitioner has averred that consolidation of holdings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the act') took place in village mallian in the year 1960. the revenue estates of village mallian and that of ..... another village chohan are adjacent to each other.3. the petitioner moved a petition under section 42 of the act before the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab ( ..... respondent no. 1) on his behalf and on behalf of others as he had a special power of attorney.4. respondent no. 1, vide his order dated may 2, 1982 (annexure p-1) remanded the case to the consolidation officer, jalandhar (respondent no ..... forward therein is that the land purchased in village chohancould not be adjusted against the claim of the petitioner in village mallian. the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab vide his order dated august 27, 1985(annexure p-4), has failed to take into consideration this aspect that the registered saledeed was a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1996 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR613

..... and prevention of fragmentation act, 1948 (for short 'the consolidation act'), before respondent no. 2 praying that they are in possession of the land mentioned in khewat no. 40 in jamabandi nos. 2001 and 2002 which was shamilat ..... deh but the consolidation department in 1960 committed a mistake by showing the area in the ownership of gram panchayat whereas respondents nos. 3 to 8 were in possession since ..... holdings, while in c.w.p. no. 686 of 1986 challenge has been given to annexure p-2 and p-7 passed by the said director (respondent no. 2 in both the writ petitions).3. it has been averred in c.w.p. no. 582 of 1986 that respondents nos. 3 to 8 moved an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation ..... any title upon it and it has been rightly ordered vide annexure p-2 that the land be re-distributed amongst the rightful owners by the consolidation authorities. under section 42 of the consolidation act, the director consolidation of holdings has the power to rectify the mistake.7. in c.w.p. no. 686 of 1986, it has been alleged by the gram panchayat that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2003 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)135PLR613

..... quashing the impugned order dated 16.1.1998 (annexure p3) passed by the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab (respondent no. 2) vide which an application filed by some of the proprietors of the village under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') for partition of the land in question between the right holders of the village has been ..... allowed and the matter was remanded to the consolidation officer, jalandhar with the direction that he should re-partition the disputed land amongst ..... the right holder's of the village.2. the consolidation of holdings took place in village phull in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2004 (HC)

Satnam Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)140PLR271

..... 1. this is a petition for setting aside order dated 12.4.1984 passed by the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, jalandhar under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) (annexure p-2).2. according to the petitioner, consolidations of holdings had taken place in village bharoli in the year 1953. the scheme was published on 24.10.1953 ..... 15.10.1954. the petitioner had installed a tubewell with an electric motor in kurrah. however, vide order dated 1.6.1979 passed under section 42 of the act, the director, consolidation of holdings, punjab had made following orders:-'for the removal of the defects pointed out above, it is necessary to prepare a fresh scheme for the village but keeping the old ..... reproduced above. annexure p-2 is the impugned order dated 12.4.1984 made by swami ram bharti, additional director consolidation of holdings, punjab jalandhar on a petition under section 42 of the act filed by hem raj. the land already given to hem raj, sarjit kaur and satnam singh, the present position had been changed. annexure p-4 is an order of ..... the same officer i.e. swami ram bharti, additional director consolidation of holdings, punjab jalandhar dated 6.4.3984 on a petition filed by one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2000 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. M/S Dalmia Industries Ltd. and Othe ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001IAD(Delhi)969; 2001(57)DRJ877

..... .metres comprising khasra no.253/2 min., 563 & 564 in village abadi (firni) of bijwasan, tehsil mehrauli, new delhi. consolidation proceedings were taken in this village vide consolidation scheme 218 dated 2.5.1975 under east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 along with delhi land reforms act resulting in land being declared within village abadi (firni) and making it entitled to benefit of appellant's notification dated ..... 24.8.1963 exempting it from building regulations contained in sections 332 to 336, 342 and 347 of delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 (dmca). 2. it transpires that ..... prior sanction of lay out plans under section 312 did not arise. it was also submitted that since land was dealt with under various enactments like delhi land reforms act and east punjab consolidation of holdings act, it was sub-divided and plots carved out under the orders of competent authority which required to be treated as sanctioned for purposes construction and nothing more was to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2011 (HC)

Sardar Singh Vs. Financial Commissioner Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the digest?1. the petition impugns the order dated 13th december, 2007 of the financial commissioner dismissing the revision petition filed by the petitioner under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. the petition came up before this court first on 14th january, 2008 when the petitioner made a statement that the petitioner, though in the writ petition has challenged ..... paper book, being his application dated 16 th september, 1996 for residential and industrial plot shows that the claim for residential plot was towards "east or north" and in the khasra forming the pre-consolidation holding. the counsel for the respondents 4 to 7 controverts. he on the contrary relies upon page 112/113 of the paper book being the demand ..... counsel for the respondents 4 to 7 has argued that the claim of the petitioner for residential plot was towards east side only and thus the question of the petitioner being now entitled to claim the residential plot in the pre-consolidation holding does not arise. on the contrary, the counsel for the petitioner with reference to page 69 of the ..... end records that the prayer of the petitioner for allotment of plot carved out of pre consolidation holding comprised in khasra nos.28/13 & 28/14 has been held by the consolidation officer to be belated since the proceedings under section 21(2) of the act already stood completed well before the receipt of the objection. the financial commissioner has thus confirmed .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //