Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Page 4 of about 525 results (0.064 seconds)

Mar 05 2007 (HC)

Om Parkash and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(95)DRJ289

..... the petitioners.2. the facts leading to the filing of this petition are that on 22.3.1953 a notification was issued under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 ('act') in respect of the estate of village mundka. the right holders were asked to make the demands for allotment of plots in the extended laldora between april ..... the petitioners herein made demands for allotment of plots in the extended laldora on 14th,15th and 16th april 1976. the petitioners are petty land holders. their total holding before the consolidation operation was a little less than three and a half bighas. in fact, they were joint khatedars with others. shri deep chand, deceased father of petitioners 1 ..... had to surrender out of his own agricultural land. in dealing with such rights of individual right holders it was incumbent upon the settlement officer (consolidation) to scrutinise the applications before him by holding proper enquiry about each of right holder concerned separately and then pass speaking orders relating to every individual case specifying cogent reasons for its acceptance ..... financial commissioner, delhi who by the impugned order dated 21.5.1991 allowed the said revision petition holding that the consolidation officer had misread and misinterpreted the order dated 9.9.1986 of his predecessor. accordingly the order dated 10.9.1990 of the consolidation officer was set aside. 12. shri o.n. vohra, learned senior counsel appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2011 (HC)

Chand Ram and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... in the petition require a lot of investigation of facts including into the records as to consolidation. it has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioners as to whether the remedy of a revision petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 would not be a proper remedy for making the grievances as made in the present writ ..... petition. it is felt that the financial commissioner in exercise of powers under section 42 of the act is better equipped to go into and answer the questions as ..... 40 years has not been concluded as yet. they further claim that they are still in possession of their pre- consolidation holdings. 2. the petitioners themselves have in the writ petition disclosed an earlier round of litigation relating to the consolidation proceedings in the village. one mr. sarup singh and others had filed w.p.(c) no.4144/1998. from ..... of 1972 having remained unimplemented. if the financial commissioner on examination of the records of consolidation finds that the consolidation in fact stood concluded and there is no merit in the averments of the petitioners, then the same would entail finality under section 24 of the act. moreover, if that be so, it will be seen that the scheme was under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1977 (SC)

Chet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC1494; (1977)79PLR490; (1977)2SCC499; [1977]3SCR369; 1977(9)LC345(SC)

..... attend due to illness, over which he had no control, was accepted by the additional director, who proceeded to exercise his powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and to set right the grievance of the applicant, gurdev singh, after going into all the relevant records. the learned judge of the high court, who ..... appeal under article 136 of the constitution is directed against a very detailed judgment of the punjab and haryana high court on a writ petition no. 1875 of 1965 filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution, assailing an order of the additional director consolidation of holdings, passed on 8 june, 1965. a perusal of that order, together with the earlier order of ..... 4 may, 1965 and the application for restoration dated 15 may, 1965, filed by gurdev singh, respondent no. 3, shows; gurdev singh, who had some complaint against the consolidation scheme, was not present so that petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2003 (HC)

Harbans Lal and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)355; 106(2003)DLT292; 2003(70)DRJ261

..... bamnoli, tehsil mehrauli whereby they had challenged the impugned order of the financial commissioner purported to have been passed in the exercise of his powers under section 42 of the east punjab holding (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (in short referred to as `the act'). the facts in short relevant for deciding this appeal are:-a notification under section 14 (i) of the ..... act was issued on 08th september, 1993, for carrying out consolidation proceedings in village bamnoli. the consolidation officer was appointed under the act on june 13, 1996. the consolidation officer initiated consolidation proceedings by issuing a notification on june 21, 1996 ..... . on june 26, 1996, advisory committee under the act was constituted to supervise the consolidation proceedings in the village. applications were invited from the residents of the village for allotment and exchange of land for different purposes. after evaluating different holdings in the village a draft consolidation scheme was announced on 26.11.1996. objections were invited from the residents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1963 (HC)

Bhikhan Bobla and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H255

..... inapplicable. it was urged that the proviso to clause (1) covered the case and the provisions of this article did not apply as the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (50 of 1948) and punjab act 20 of 1953 which amended section 36 in the form in which it is at present did not receive the assent of the president. the ..... cases which has been referred for disposal by the full bench. the question mainly concerns the scope, legality and constitutionality of section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act).2. four writ petitions had been filed in this court under article 226 of the constitution praying for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order ..... of omission.65. the above discussion leads me to the following conclusions:(1) the provisions of article 31a of the constitution are attracted, and the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (50 of 1948) in general, or section 36 in particular, cannot be deemed void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away, or abridges any ..... , j. and the concurrent note of learned brother dua j. i agree that the word 'may' in section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, hereinafter to be referred to as the act, does not indicate that an option is given to the settlement officer whether or not to prepare the subsequent scheme in accordance with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2002 (HC)

Satbir Singh and ors. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT85; 2003(66)DRJ775

..... that the notification dated 8.9.1993 under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was issued in respect of 12 villages including ..... notification dated 8 9.1993 issued by the lt. governor delhi intending to make a scheme for reconsolidation of holdings purporting to act under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act no. 50 of 1948 (as extended to delhi) (consolidation act) and also for consolidation scheme under sub-section (2) of section 14 thereof.3. the respondents in their counter affidavit have averred ..... village abadi.6. that in each village with the passage of time there is fragmentation of agricultural holdings and due to growth in the village population there is additional demand for residential land. to provide for consolidation and assignment or reservation of land for common purposes the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was enacted. the same has been extended to the union territory of delhi vide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1976 (HC)

The State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Sohan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1976P& H131

..... 1, 1950:--'in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 1 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, the governor of east punjab is pleased to order that sections 2 and 14-47 of the said act shall come into force in the whole of east punjab with effect from the 1st january, 1950.'no other notification under sub-section (3) of section 1 ..... judgment under appeal, the learned single judge has observed that from a mere reading of section 13 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the consolidation act), it is clear that the state govern-ment cannot acquire any land so as to leave a fragment and inasmuch as acquisition of a plot measuring l kanal 12 marlas in area out of the total area ..... new khasra no. 15/15/1, min north measuring 1 kanal 12 marlas out of 5 kanals is contrary to section 13 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (50 of 1948) as respondent no. 2 could not acquire so as to leave a fragment.' '9 (b). that the creation of new khasra no. 15/15/1, min north out of khasra numbers carved during .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1965 (HC)

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

..... petitioners belonging to village gulalta in tehsil ferozepore jhirka of gurgaon district. consolidation of holdings began in that village with the publication of a notification for that purpose under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (east. punjab act 50 of 1948), hereinafter to be referred as 'the act', sometime in 1956. on appointment of the consolidation officer under that very section, after advice of the land-owners of ..... the estate, he prepared on may 4, 1957, a scheme for consolidation of holdings in that estate. after some objections to the scheme ..... the 30th of july 1960 and ordered the scheme of village gulalta to be amended under section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) to provide separate tak for chahi area. the petitioners claim that they were never heard before the said order was passed. it is also stated that the above order was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1959 (HC)

Kundan and ors. Vs. Sardara Ramji Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1959P& H206

..... courts.in civil revn. no. 27 of 1955 (punj.) the correctness of a record of rights prepared under the provisions of section 22 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 was held to be capable of being challenged in a civil court.in that case also my lord the chief justice obseived that a record of rights ..... dua, j.1. the only question arising for consideration in this appeal is whether or not the present suit is barred by section 44 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act of 1948. jn so far as the merits are concerned the learned counsel for the appellants has conceded that there, is no substance in the appeal. the question ..... without jurisdiction. the only provisions of law on which the learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance are section 44 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act and rule 7 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation; rules of 1949. section 44 reads thus --'no civil court shall entertain any suit instituted or application made, to obtain a decision ..... 1955 where the hon'ble the chief justice has observed that the jurisdiction of civil courts is not barred where question of tide in proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, is involved in civil revn. no.3 of 1953 (punj.) the landlords had brought a suit for the ejetment of their tenants and had obtained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 1990 (HC)

Mrs. Renuka Sekhon Vs. the State of Punjab Through the Secretary Reven ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1990)98PLR58

..... of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the consolidation act), to mean the amalgamation and the resdistribution of all or any of the ..... east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. the act was enacted with the object of bringing prosperity to the peasantry and to promote the village economy by making the plots viable for agricultural purposes and further to prevent fragmentation of the agricultural land holdings. it was an act in the nature of agrarian reforms. it provides compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings. 'consolidation of holdings' has been defined by section 2(b) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //