Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Page 7 of about 525 results (0.123 seconds)

Feb 19 1992 (HC)

Ram Lal and ors. Vs. Madan Jha and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1992(23)DRJ62; 1992RLR170

..... of the rasta to their chaks lying next to those of the petitioners and hence the respondent moved an application under section 42 of the the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 before the the financial commissioner in april, 1987. my attention has been drawn towards aksh shajra of the year 1953-54 showing that during the ..... bids was including khasra no. 22/1 fell to the share of the petitioners. one ranjit singh filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 before the financial commissioner in april. 1987. claiming passage to his fields. the financial accepted that application and remanded the case to the settlement officer ..... (consolidation) for providing passage to the fields of ranjit singh. the settlement officer (consolidation) vide order dated 30/8/88 directed that 'a rasta having width of 2 ghatha towards eastern ..... consolidation proceedings rasta was carved out from khasra 22/1/1. according to the learned counsel the version given by the petitioners is contrary to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2008 (HC)

Dy. Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Kumari and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT133

..... these petitions, including the two contempt petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment.relevant facts2. on 17th april 1986 a notification was issued under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('holdings act') by the competent authority commencing the process of consolidation of land in the village kapashera in new delhi. pursuant to the said notification dated 17th april 1986 the ..... refer in my affidavit was purchased in 1994-95. the documents produced by me today pertain to those lands.i do not recollect filing any objections before the consolidation officer under section 21 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation), act. i am not in a position to either refuse or admit the suggestion that i had filed any objections under section 21 of the ..... east punjab holdings act.q. can you tell the court whether pursuant to order dated 1.12.1995, when were you put in your physical possession of the exchanged land and which officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2004 (HC)

Rishi Parkash and ors. Vs. Director Consolidation of Holdings and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)137PLR501

..... in the present appeal. the passage aforesaid was used by the proprietors of the village.3. after almost 40 years of finalisation of consolidation proceedings, the appellants filed application dated 3.2.1993 under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (for short, 'the act') before director of holdings, haryana (respondent no. 1) with the prayer that they may be provided passage to their ..... holdings. the same was accepted by respondent no. 1 vide order dated 26.8.1993 and the matter was sent to settlement officer (consolidation), rohtak, with the direction that passage be ..... .t. 1997(8) s.c. 430 and it has been held that even though, the limitation prescribed in rule 10 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1949 is not applicable to an application filed under section 42 of the act, the competent authority cannot entertain an application/petition filed under that section after long lapse of time. the proposition of law laid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 1966 (HC)

Mahant Som Dass Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H186

..... brother r.s. narula, j. dated 22-10-1965.2. according to the petitioner, the notification issued by the government under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act) is intended to consolidate holdings in the estate of kheri naga along with some other estates. in the estate of kheri naga, the whole of the land belongs to thakurdwara of ..... is obvious that this provision of law only contemplates a notification with the object of consolidating holdings and for no other purpose. it is true that in the preamble of the act, in addition to the legislative intendment to provide for the compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings and for preventing fragmentation of agricultural holdings, in 1960, the purpose was extended to the assignment or reservation of land for ..... common purposes of the village, but the language of section 14(1) of the act is quite clearly confined only to the object of consolidating the holdings. while preparing a scheme for the consolidation of holdings, the act, of course, authorises reservation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1984 (HC)

Jagtar Singh Vs. Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdings Jullun ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1984P& H216

..... the constitution of india for quashing the order of additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, jullundur, dated march 27, 1981. the consolidation proceedings in the village of the parties, lakhan kalan, tehsil and district kapurthala, started in the year 1956. the petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') on which the impugned order was passed, was filed on ..... september 21, 1976, along with an application for condonation of delay. the addl. director consolidation of holdings, though noticed that the petition was barred by time, yet without condoning the delay ..... appearance and filed written statement. on the question of delay, the plea put forth on behalf of respondent no. 2 is that the provisions of rule 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1949 (hereinafter called the 'rules') did not apply as the petition had been filed against the scheme and not against any order. in support of that plea, reliance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1996 (HC)

Niranjan Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)113PLR740

..... t.h.b. challapathi, j.1. this writ petition is filed for quashing the order of additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab jullunder passed under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentations) act, 1948 (for short the 'act') on 9.12.1980.2. respondents 3 to 6 filed an application before the additional director, pun- jab, jullunder alleging that there was a passage in killa no. 21 of ..... to 6 filed an application for carving out a passage in the year 1979 i.e. nearly 20 years after the finalisation of the consolidation proceedings. i am of the view that section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 has no application to the facts of the present case. the respondents no. 3 to 6 are claiming a right of passage across ..... no. 34o 6 has filed in the year 1979 i.e. nearly 18 years after the finalisation of the consolidation proceedings and therefore the additional director, consolidation of holdings punjab has no power under section 42 of the act to carve out a passage from his holdings by the impugned order that a passage should be provided at the missing place by remanding the case to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1972 (HC)

Puran Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H131

..... by a learned single judge of this court on the ground that the application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act). had been made beyond the period of six months prescribed by rule 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1949, (hereinafter called the rules) and that the delay in filing the application had been condoned by the ..... learned additional director, consolidation of holdings, on wholly extraneous grounds. in coming to that conclusion, the learned judge relied on division bench ..... judgment of this court in sewa singh v. state of punjab, ilr (1967)2 punj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1971 (HC)

The State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Hari Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H328

..... as used in rule 16(ii) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1949, referred to hereinafter as the rules, framed under the rule-making power conferred by section 46 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, hereinafter called the act.2. a scheme of consolidation of holdings for village bahlba, tehsil gohana, district rohtak, was ..... prepared by the consolidation authorities and an area measuring 3220 kanals 4 marlas was reserved for common purposes ..... allegedly under section 18 of the act. sixty-six right-holders filed a ..... or otherwise.' section 2 (g) defined the expression 'prescribed' as follows:--' 'prescribed' means prescribed by rules made under this act;'section 18 admittedly empowers the consolidation officer to reserve land for common purpose in certain contingencies but the manner in which reservation is to be made is guided and controlled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 04 1992 (HC)

Harminder Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab, Through Director, Co ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)103PLR638

..... question raised is as to whether the government is competent to issue notification under sub section (1) of section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentations) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) in an estate where consolidation had already taken place under the act.2. the writ-petitioners are the land-owners in village khadial tehsil sunam district sangrur. notification under section 14(1) of ..... the act was published on 21.9.1953 and confirmed on 6.12.1959. subsequently, the scheme was revoked and withdrawn on 15.10 ..... in view of this provision, the authorities should have acted under section 36 of the act instead of ordering fresh consolidation under the act. lastly, he submitted that the scheme of the act is to consolidate the holdings and to prevent future fragmentation and, therefore, the government is bound to act under chapter ii of the act instead of ordering reconsolidation of holdings.5. in order to appreciate the contention advanced by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1993 (HC)

Mehar DIn Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)106PLR184

..... the land was purchased by respondent no. 2 from baru ram, he filed application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (here-in-after referred to as the act of 1948). so, the matter came up for adjudication before the deputy director, consolidation, haryana, who passed the impugned order, annexure p-5. it is pleaded and so argued by learned o counsel ..... appearing for the petitioner that order, annexure p5, is illegal and the consolidation proceedings in the village had been completed ..... p-3, jamabandi for the year 1986-87. no path was given to his vendor even during the consolidation proceedings. it is in these circumstances that he had no choice but for to make an application under section 42 of the act, 1948 for getting path to go to his land.4. after hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through ..... the records of the case, i am of the considered view that the points raised by learned counsel for the petitioner have no merit and, therefore, this writ must fail. the director, consolidation in the impugned order .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //