Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1958 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.115 seconds)

Sep 03 1958 (HC)

General S. Shivdev Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-03-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H453

..... powers which it exercises under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, to the additional director consolidation with effect from a prior date, namely, 17-6-1957. 2. the facts are not in dispute. the proceedings relating to consolidation of holdings started in village amlasinghwala, district sangrur, on 25-11-1954 under the pepsu holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 2007 bk. (which will be referred to as ..... . on 12-2-1953 the following notification was issued: 'no. 283-div-5s (ch)/1167. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 41 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, the governor of punjab is pleased to notify that with effect from 17-6-1957 the powers of the state government under section 42 of the ..... act have also been delegated to the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, p. s. multaniunder secretary to government punjab, forests and game preservation department.' the state did not file any written statement prior to 12-2-1958 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1958 (HC)

Lakha Singh Toba Singh and ors. Vs. Director, Consolidation of Holding ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-15-1958

Reported in : AIR1959P& H157

..... the question of the interpretation of certain provisions of the patiala and east punjab states union holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (act no. v of 2007 bk) has been referred to a division bench by grover, j. in consequence of the fact that his own interpretation of identical provisions contained in the corresponding punjab act expressed in civil writ no. 236 of 1957 decided by him ..... order of the settlement commissioner was reversed and the order of the settlement officer-restored by the director of consolidation of holdings, punjab, (integration having taken place in the meantime,) apparently exercising the powers of the government under section 41 of the act.3. the question involved is whether the government under section 41 can revise or review its own order passed ..... exercised powers as such and not by virtue of the delegation made by the state government. in the present case the powers which were exercised by the assistant director, consolidation of holdings, in disposing of the appeal under section 21(4) were exercised by him as delegate of the state government. in other words, the decision which was being given ..... was one of the delegate to the state government and not of any officer, and, therefore, it was not open to the director, consolidation of holdings, who himself was also exercising the powers of the state government, to set aside the previous order. moreover, the powers given under section 42 are meant to be .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //