Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1959 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.038 seconds)

Jan 05 1959 (HC)

Kundan and ors. Vs. Sardara Ramji Lal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-05-1959

Reported in : AIR1959P& H206

..... courts.in civil revn. no. 27 of 1955 (punj.) the correctness of a record of rights prepared under the provisions of section 22 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 was held to be capable of being challenged in a civil court.in that case also my lord the chief justice obseived that a record of rights ..... dua, j.1. the only question arising for consideration in this appeal is whether or not the present suit is barred by section 44 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act of 1948. jn so far as the merits are concerned the learned counsel for the appellants has conceded that there, is no substance in the appeal. the question ..... without jurisdiction. the only provisions of law on which the learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance are section 44 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act and rule 7 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation; rules of 1949. section 44 reads thus --'no civil court shall entertain any suit instituted or application made, to obtain a decision ..... 1955 where the hon'ble the chief justice has observed that the jurisdiction of civil courts is not barred where question of tide in proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, is involved in civil revn. no.3 of 1953 (punj.) the landlords had brought a suit for the ejetment of their tenants and had obtained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1959 (HC)

Munsha Singh Dhaman Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-05-1959

Reported in : AIR1960P& H317

..... question, however, which falls for decision in the instant case, is, whether this object was intended by the legislature to fall within the purpose and intent of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act l of 1948. it is no doubt open to the legislature to achieve this object by suitable enactment, but, as at present advised, i am inclined to agree with the views ..... provision of law, are quashed. i will leave the parties to bear their own costs.dulat, j.(52) in the petitioners' village proceedings for the consolidation of land holdings are going on and a scheme has been prepared under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 50 of 1948. this scheme proposes, among other things, to set apart or reserve bank of india, or assign, as the ..... in this village in 1945, and the holdings of all the proprietors wee consolidated to the satisfaction of all concerned. the respondents again started consolidation proceedings in the village and prepared a scheme for consolidation. under the new consolidation proceedings, the estate was notified under s. 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (no. 50 of 1948)--hereinafter called the consolidation act--as per notification no. 57-g/17943 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1959 (HC)

Bhagwat Dayal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-08-1959

Reported in : AIR1959P& H544

..... with retrospective effect was held to be valid. in that case i am informed by my learned brother the government appointed an additional director (consolidation) to hear appeals under section 21(4) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act. by an oversight, however, he was not given any power to hear the appeals. the additional director so appointed, heard the appeals ..... and decided them. on discovering the mistake the punjab government issued a notification with retrospective effect. the full bench upheld the notification as valid. the ..... principle laid down in the full. bench case applies to the present case and more so when the consolidation proceedings are of a quasi-judicial nature while the 'land acquisition collector acts only as an authority to make ..... land acquisition collector is only an offer on behalf of the government. for this purpose the collector acts only as an agent and it is open to the principal i.e. the government to ratify it. in s. arjan singh v. state of punjab, civil writ no. 476 of 1957: (air 1959 punj 538) i expressed my opinion that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //