Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.055 seconds)

Dec 13 1972 (HC)

Suraj Mal and anr. Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-13-1972

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi1016

..... them from taking possession of any land of the plaintiff in pursuance of the said order of the chief commissioner. consolidation proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, herein after referred to as the consolidation act, were ordered in 1952. a scheme of consolidation of holdings was prepared but by an order passed in 1954 the chief commissioner ordered fresh revaluation of the land in the village ..... advantageous first to read certain relevant provisions of the consolidation act and the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation )rules, 1949, hereinafter called the consolidation rules, as applicable in delhi and also to read some of the relevant provisions of the punjab land revenue act, 1887. (5) it will also be necessary to appreciate the scheme of the consolidation act and the consolidation rules so as to understand the respective rights and ..... obligations of the parties in consolidation proceeding. the relevant provisions of the consolidation act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1972 (HC)

Ranbir Singh and anr. Vs. Mangal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-03-1972

Reported in : AIR1972P& H274

..... to transfer or otherwise deal with any portion of his original holding so as to affect the rights of any other landowner under the scheme of consolidation'.section 30 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the punjab act) exactly corresponds to section 29 of the pepsu act.2. in the case before us on 3rd july, 1956 a notification under sub-section (1 ..... ) of s. 14 of the pepsu act was published in the official gazette. this notification was ..... is appointed, it was observed by the learned judge as follows:--'the mere issue of the notification under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, without any further step having been taken will not make the consolidation proceedings pending in the village'.13. there can be no quarrel with these observations as such, but the learned judge nowhere discussed the question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1972 (HC)

Puran Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-1972

Reported in : AIR1973P& H131

..... by a learned single judge of this court on the ground that the application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act). had been made beyond the period of six months prescribed by rule 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules, 1949, (hereinafter called the rules) and that the delay in filing the application had been condoned by the ..... learned additional director, consolidation of holdings, on wholly extraneous grounds. in coming to that conclusion, the learned judge relied on division bench ..... judgment of this court in sewa singh v. state of punjab, ilr (1967)2 punj .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1972 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Sarmukh Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1972

Reported in : AIR1972P& H463

..... rectangle no. 47 of the revenue estate of sureshwala, tehsil fazilka, district ferozepore. consolidation proceedings started in this village when a notification under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) was issued on april 12, 1960. the scheme of consolidation was finally published on january 15, 1961. it was confirmed under section 20(3) ..... of the act on february 21, 1961. a scheme of repartition under section 21(1) of the act was published on april 11, ..... support was sought from a division bench judgment of this court in sadha singh v. state of punjab, ilr (1968) 1 punj 378, which, in turn, purports to apply the principle settled by the full bench in deep chand v. addl. director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, ilr (1964) 1 punj 665=(air 1964 punj 249 (fb)).6. in deep chand's ..... case, ilr (1964) 1 punj 665=(air 1964 punj 249 (fb))(ibid) the full bench ruled that the additional director consolidation or any other judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal has no inherent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1972 (HC)

Caltex Oil Refining (India) Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-03-1972

Reported in : 1989(25)LC585(Delhi); 1979(4)ELT581(Del)

..... in harbhajan singh v. karam singh and ors., a.i.r. 1966 supc 641. it was held in construing the scheme of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 that inasmuch as no court or authority has power of setting aside an order which has been properly made unless it is given by statute ..... that the question of claiming the refund arose. on receipt of the letter dated 3rd august, 1963 the petitioner lost no time in preferring a consolidated claim. the authorities concerned also did not invoke rule 11. in that view of the matter we cannot reject the contention of the petition outright ..... itself invited claims by its letter dated 4th june, 1963 which would amount to relaxation on 3rd august, 1963 and in that very month the consolidated claim was preferred. indeed, none of the excise authorities rejected the claim of the petitioner by invoking rule 11.29. on behalf of the collector ..... be marketed. it is in this context, thereforee that the provisions of section 3 of the act and rules 9 and 49 of the excise rules have to ..... the scheme of the act and the rules teed to show that no excise duty would be collected on the product. for example the glut of a particular article in the market may make it expedient for a manufacturer to hold back his product or financial circumstances may prevent the finished product to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1972 (HC)

Malkiat Singh and anr. Vs. Gram Panchayat Sekha Kalan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-27-1972

Reported in : AIR1974P& H28

..... , wherein it has been observed:'that under section 44 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act the jurisdiction of the civil court is barred only where the state government or the officer concerned acts within the provisions of the act, and not where the acts illegally and in contravention of the mandatory provisions of the act, or in excess of the powers conferred by it. where the ..... the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants has got a great force. section 33 of the consolidation act is as follows:--'notwithstanding anything contained in any law for ..... santa singh the father of the appellants, and, therefore, it was illegal and void. the learned counsel for the respondent states that under section 33 of the east punjab of fragmentation) act, 1948, (hereinafter referred to as the consolidation act), an oral gift could be made. i have heard the contentions of the learned counsel for the parties at length and i am of the view that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1972 (HC)

Kartar Singh Vs. Lal Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-07-1972

Reported in : AIR1972P& H385

..... , and was confirmed on september 11, 1957. the repartition under sub-section (1) of section 21 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (50 of 1948) (hereinafter called the consolidation act) was published on january 18, 1958. possessions were thereafter transferred and after this had been done, the consolidation record was consigned to the record room.bhag singh father of karnail singh writ-petitioner (respondent no. 4 ..... before us) filed an appeal under sub-section (4) of section 21 of the consolidation act before the assistant director which ..... the prescribed manner in the estate or estates concerned; and the consolidation officer shall, if necessary, put them in physical possession of the holding to which they are so entitled including standing crops if any, and for doing so may exercise the powers of a revenue officer under the punjab land revenue act, 1887 '(3) .. .. .. .. (4) .. .. .. .. 24. (1) as soon as the persons entitled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1972 (SC)

Rashid Sk. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-1972

Reported in : AIR1973SC824; 1973CriLJ656; (1973)3SCC476

..... made by the district magistrate, burdwan under section 3(1) and (2) of the maintenance of internal security act, 26 of (hereinafter called the act), the petitioner was arrested on january 5,1972 and detained with a view to 'preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community'. the grounds of detention ..... republic and its protection against arbitrary and unlawful invasion.in abdul karim v. state of west bengal : 1969crilj1446 this court, while considering the permissible limits of legislation empowering preventive detention as laid down in article 22 observed after referring to other clauses of article 22:apart from these enabling and. disabling provisions certain procedural rights have been expressly ..... 's representation. the state government, in our view, failed to realize the vital importance of the constitutional check placed on the subjective exercise of the extraordinary power of preventively detaining citizens without trial. this check, it may be pointed out, serves as a safeguard against misuse or improper exercise of this power and is inextricably linked with ..... the legality of preventive detention. we are not unmindful of the interest of the society but those interests have been harmonized by the constitution with the interest of the individual.6. in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //