Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.036 seconds)

Aug 08 1977 (SC)

Padam Nabh Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-08-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC2001; (1977)79PLR715; (1977)4SCC1; 1977(9)LC483(SC)

..... to as the act, declaring its intention for the preparation of a scheme of consolidation of holdings for the better cultivation of village tripari. the additional director, consolidation of holdings, issued an order on october 15, 1973, reserving same land for the purpose ..... of the punjab and haryana high court dated november 27, 1975, upholding the dismissal of their writ petition. the fact leading upto the controversy in this court are quite simple, and may be shortly stated. 2. a notification was issued by the state government on november 24, 1972, under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, hereinafter referred ..... for which land has been reserved by the order of the additional director of consolidation dated october 15, 1973 will be 'a source of great convenience and benefit to the villagers' the high court has stated that the road in question will not ..... petition, so that there is no real basis for raising the new argument in this court. the high court has noticed the definition of 'common purpose' in the act, which includes any purpose in relation to any common need, convenience or benefit of the village in respect of 'village roads'. it has held that the proposed road .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1977 (SC)

Chet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-24-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC1494; (1977)79PLR490; (1977)2SCC499; [1977]3SCR369; 1977(9)LC345(SC)

..... attend due to illness, over which he had no control, was accepted by the additional director, who proceeded to exercise his powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and to set right the grievance of the applicant, gurdev singh, after going into all the relevant records. the learned judge of the high court, who ..... appeal under article 136 of the constitution is directed against a very detailed judgment of the punjab and haryana high court on a writ petition no. 1875 of 1965 filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution, assailing an order of the additional director consolidation of holdings, passed on 8 june, 1965. a perusal of that order, together with the earlier order of ..... 4 may, 1965 and the application for restoration dated 15 may, 1965, filed by gurdev singh, respondent no. 3, shows; gurdev singh, who had some complaint against the consolidation scheme, was not present so that petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1977 (SC)

Chintapalli Agency Taluk Arrack Sales Cooperative Society Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC2313; (1977)4SCC337; [1978]1SCR563; 1977(9)LC651(SC)

..... . roop chand's case (supra) is clearly distinguishable since there under section 41(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation). act, 1948, the state government appoints persons and delegates its powers or functions under the act to such officers. when, therefore, an officer acts as a delegate of the state government he exercises statutory power of appeal of the government under section 21(4) ..... of the act. this court observed in that case:. . . such a power when delegated remains the power of ..... the registrar as an order passed by 'any other officer' appointed under section 3(1). the scheme of the consolidation act which this court had to deal with in roop chanel's case (supra) is different from that of the co-operative act. the submission of counsel that the registrar's order in revision is a nullity is devoid of substance.22. ..... order. in this context the respondents rely upon a decision of this court in roop chand v. state of punjab [1963] suppl. scr 530 in support of the above submission.17. we may first examine the scheme of the present act with which we are concerned. the appointment of the registrar and 'other persons' is provided for under section 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1977 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Vijay Chand Jain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-02-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC1302; 1977CriLJ812; (1977)2SCC405; [1977]2SCR952; 1977(9)LC240(SC)

..... being 'connected with', and we have no difficulty in holding that the currency in respect of which there has been contravention covers the sale proceeds of foreign currency, sale of which is prohibited under section 4(1). the intention of ..... words. this court in s. s. light railway co. ltd. v. upper doab sugar mills ltd. and anr. : 1983crilj1044 construing these words in section 3(14) of the indian railways act, 1890 has held that they are very wide. it seems to us that in the context of section 23(1b) 'in respect of' has been used in the sense of ..... fitness turns on the meaning of the words 'in respect of' accruing in section 23(1b) of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1947. for a proper appreciation of the question, it is necessary to refer to two other sections of the act, section 4(1) and section 23 (1)(a), before we turn to section 23 (1b). section 4(1) lays down .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //