Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.047 seconds)

Apr 16 1979 (HC)

Sukhdarshan Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-16-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H94

..... that the provisions of sub-secs. (3) and (4) of s. 32-d are analogous to the provisions of ss. 21(4) and 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention at fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter. referred to as the consolidation act), and, therefore, the judgment of the supreme court in harbhajan singh v. karam singh, air 1966 sc 641, was brought in aid that there is no power ..... place reliance on the decision in roop chand's case (supra), where the supreme court held as follows:--'where the state government has, under s. 41(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, delegated its power gives under s. 21(4) to hear appeals to an officer, an order passed by such officer is an order passed by. the state government ..... itself and not an `order passed by any officer under this act' within the meaning. of s. 42. the order contemplated by s. 42 is an order passed by an officer ..... that order of the commissioner, the petitioner filed a revision before the financial commissioner punjab under section 32d(4) of the act. the financial commissioner vide order dated jan. 5, 1978, annexure p-3, dismissed the revision holding that no revision was competent under s. 32-d(4) of the act, following the decisions referred to above.5. as already stated, the only .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1979 (HC)

Rajender Parshad and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-28-1979

Reported in : AIR1980P& H37

..... bench decision which had repelled the attack against the constitutionality of the east punjab holding (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act,. 1948 the issue was carried before the final court with regard to the vires of the consolidation act, punjab gram panchayat act, punjab village common lands (regulation) act, and the security of land tenures act and in ranjit singh v. state of punjab, air 1965 sc 632, their lordships held that all these provisions were ..... this court in kishan singh v. state of punjab, air 1961 punj 1, and was upheld. the correctness of that view was again sought to be put to test ..... writ petition to assail the very constitutionality of the act.4. now for a true appreciation of the contentions raised on either side, some reference to the legislative history and precedent in connection therewith is both inevitable and in fact necessary. the constitutional validity of an analogous statute, namely, the east punjab holding (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, as amended, was assailed before a full bench of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //