Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.060 seconds)

Apr 10 1990 (HC)

Mrs. Renuka Sekhon Vs. the State of Punjab Through the Secretary Reven ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-10-1990

Reported in : (1990)98PLR58

..... of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the consolidation act), to mean the amalgamation and the resdistribution of all or any of the ..... east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. the act was enacted with the object of bringing prosperity to the peasantry and to promote the village economy by making the plots viable for agricultural purposes and further to prevent fragmentation of the agricultural land holdings. it was an act in the nature of agrarian reforms. it provides compulsory consolidation of agricultural holdings. 'consolidation of holdings' has been defined by section 2(b) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1990 (HC)

Regal Traders Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-1990

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi282; 42(1990)DLT44; 1990RLR334

..... is. situated within the lal dora of firni or abadi of the village as extended during the consolidation operation of village mundka during 1975-76 under the provisions of delhi land reforms act read with the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 and that by virtue of 'notification no. rnz11731 dated 24-8-1963 issued by the municipal corporation ..... of delhi under section 507(b)(i) of the act, it is exempted from building regulations provided in sections 332-336 ..... and 342 and 347 of the act and as such the construction ..... (14) mr. sabharwal next contended that the land in question situated in village mundka was the subject matter of consolidation proceedings in 1975-76 under the east punjab holding (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (for short 'e.p.h. act') and the land in question was declared as extended village abadi. the parcels of land falling in extended village abadi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1990 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Through Its Sarpanch Vs. Director, Consolidation of Hol ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-05-1990

Reported in : (1991)99PLR342

..... 1988, being identical all these petitions are being disposed of by one and the same judgment2. during consolidation proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, certain area of land can be earmarked for the 'common purposes of a village by imposing cut on the holdings of the proprietors of the village. a contoversy arose in this court in a number of cases ..... . precisely, this very view has been taken by the director/additional director, consolidation of holdings, in the present writ petitions and the cases have been remitted by issuing the directions to the consolidation officers for redistribution of land to the original proprietors from whom it was taken during consolidation pro rata by defining the shares of the right holders. these orders are ..... was also sought to be challenged on the ground that the original proprietors from who land was taken during consolidation have approached the consolidation authorities after a considerably long period and that too direct under section 42 of the said act of 19 8 i am not impressed by the argument as substantial justice has been done between the parties and ..... if a mistake crept in during consolidation, that is, by either reserving the land more than what was required or by not immediatly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1990 (HC)

Mansha Singh Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-04-1990

Reported in : (1991)99PLR146

..... -2-1988.3. reference to facts has been made from the pleadings in cwp 3021/1988.4. a scheme of consolidation for village ruksana was prepared under the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the east punjab holdings act) in the year 1958 59. in the scheme, land was reserved for various common purposes. land measuring 400 kanals was ..... punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act.'these observations, clearly indicate that the ratio of the judgment is in applicable to ..... it was reserved for public welfare purposes (common purposes) i.e., school, during consolidation proceedings such land comes under the management of panchayar and thus (sic) in the panchayat under section 23-a(b) of the eats punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act and such land would be public premises as defined under section 2(e) of the ..... common purposes of a village under section is of the east punjab holdings act. section 18 of the east punjab holdings act provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, it shall be lawful for the consolidation officer to direct that if in any area under consolidation no land is reserved for any common purpose including .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1990 (SC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Smt. Kamla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-1990

Reported in : AIR1991SC967; 1991CriLJ602

..... , the high court on the scrutiny of the evidence has found thus:consequently, we are unable to hold that the recoveries of the ornaments and the axe at the instance of the appellant and in consequence of her information are beyond suspicion.7. coming to the imported piece ..... deceased at the time of the occurrence, were recovered in pursuance of the admissible portion of the statement of the respondent within the meaning of section 27 of the evidence act; (4) that the weapon of offence namely the axe was also recovered in pursuance of the statement of the respondent.6. regarding the recoveries of the ornaments and the axe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1990 (SC)

Committee for Protection of Rights of Ongc Employees and Others Vs. Oi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-1990

Reported in : AIR1990SC1167; [1990(60)FLR747]; JT1990(1)SC560; (1991)IILLJ271SC; 1990(1)SCALE620; (1990)2SCC472; [1990]2SCR156

..... service under the commission; and(c) all persons employed by the commission on the date of its establishment, who, immediately before such date, hold, in a permanent or quasi-permanent capacity, posts in connection with the affairs of the union or of any state, but not posts in ..... storage ltd. the undertaking of that company was statutorily acquired by the government of india under the burmah shell (acquisition of undertakings in india) act, 1976, and subsequently the said undertaking was vested by the central government in the bharat petroleum corporation limited, a government company. in the ..... the commission it has been stated that after the introduction of contributory provident fund, in accordance with the provisions of the provident fund act and the provident fund scheme, the petitioners have been availing the benefits of contributory provident fund and since the petitioners have opted for ..... of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the act, the employees who were employed in the commission immediately before the establishment of the commission under the ongc act became employees of the commission and they are entitled to hold their office or service in the commission upon the same ..... to the provisions of this act, every person employed by the existing organisation immediately before the date of establishment of the commission shall, on and from such date, become an employee of the commission with such designation as the commission may determine and shall hold his office or service therein .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1990 (HC)

Ujagar Singh and ors. Vs. Gram Panchayat Naggal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-11-1990

Reported in : (1990)98PLR9

..... said decision cannot be applied to the facts of the case in hand as that was a case where land was reserved for common purposes under the provisions of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act and the scheme provided that income of the said land would go to the panchayat, which position was not accepted by the court. the land which is reserved for ..... common purposes under the consolidation act would not vest in the panchayat as the same earlier belonged to proprietors.6. the other decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants ..... shamilat deh. this contention with respect to the entire land in dispute cannot be accepted.3. 'shamilat deh' is defined in section 2 (g) of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 (for short 'the act) as under :--'2 (g) 'shamilat deh' includes- (1) lands described in the revenue records as shamilat deh excluding abadi deh; (2) shamilat tikkas; (3) lands described ..... 's case (supra). the division bench held that the land reserved for common purposes during consolidation proceedings would not be shamilat deh as defined under section 2 (g) of the act and the gram panchayat, thus, could not file an application under section 7 of the act. this decision again is not applicable to the facts of the said case in hand.7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //