Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.060 seconds)

Dec 08 1995 (HC)

Smt. Amarjit Kaur and anr. Vs. the Additional Director, Consolidation ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-08-1995

Reported in : (1996)114PLR217

..... department has no concern to provide a path to those lands which were purchased after the completion of consolidation proceedings. thereafter, the 3rd respondent budha singh filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 for providing a passage to him. that application was allowed .vide impugned order dated 5th march, ..... 1981 (annexure p.6), by the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab.4. according to the learned counsel for the petitioners the impugned order ..... plot belonging to mohinder singh, who is the maternal uncle of the petitioners. before passing the impugned order, the additional director consolidation of holdings called for a report from the consolidation officer. the consolidation officer after making a spot inspection, submitted a detailed report dated 16th february, 1981. from that report it is clear ..... singh filed an application under section 42 of the act. the high court in civil writ petition no. 885 of 1977, set aside the orders of the additional director, consolidation of holdings dated 31st august, 1976 and remanded the matter to the additional director, consolidation of holdings with a direction that the case may be decided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1995 (HC)

ishwar Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-10-1995

Reported in : AIR1996P& H30

..... inked in red and in common parlance abadi deh is known as area within the lai lakir. according to the instructions for the guidance of thel consolidation staff issued under the east punjab holdings (consolidation of prevention and fragmentation) act, 1948, it' is provided that in every village after ascertain-ing the shajras a provision shall be made for the passages and roads leading to the ..... the centre of the village or from the lal lakir but not from the phirni of the village. abadi deh has not been specifically defined either under the punjab revenue act or punjab village common land (regulation) actwhich are applicable to the state of haryana. on the basis of judicial pronouncements abadi deh means inhabited village site which is ..... in respect of which closure orders/directions have been issued by the central pollution control board under section 31-a of air (prevention and control ofpollution) act, 1981 or by the central government under section 5 of the environment. (protection) act, 1986, shall stop functioning/ operating with immediate effect. (6) the delhi development authority through its vice-chairman and commissioner ..... notification dated 4-8-1992 annexure p1 to take immediate steps under ss. 5 and 7 of the environment (protection) act, 1986 and rules framed thereunder with the object to maintain ecological balance in the state, to prevent environmental degradation and to avoid traffic and human hazards. the governor of haryana identified the zones for stone crushers as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1995 (HC)

Kehar Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-28-1995

Reported in : AIR1996P& H21

..... cannot add to the words of the statute and lay down a period of limitation. a similar contention had been raised in the context of section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation) and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. it was rejected by a full bench of this court in nar singh mansoor singh v. state, air 1967 punj iii, and by a division bench in haqiqat ..... singh v. the additional director consolidation of holdings, punjab, air 1981 punj & har 204. in view of these authoritative pronouncements, the contention has to be rejected.10. lastly, it was contended that ..... the state of haryana filed a revision petition invoking the suo motu jurisdiction of the financial commissioner under section 18(6) of the haryana ceiling on land holdings act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the act). this revision petition having been accepted, the two sons of soran have filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution. they challenge the order ..... the land having not been utilised, it did not vest in the state. the contention has to be only noted to be rejected. the provisions of section 12 of the haryana ceiling on land holdings act, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1995 (HC)

Vijayawada Urban Zilla Weaker Section and Economically Backward Classe ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-1995

Reported in : AIR1996AP80

..... rights of the government vis-a-vis the transferee under the provisions of the central act.47. the leanred counsel for the society nextly relied on another decision in swaran singh v. state of punjab : air1994sc2301 . the matter arose under east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act (1948). the quesion that arose for consideration before their lordships of the supreme court was whether ..... the tenant of an agricultural land can be a 'party interested' and can claim notice to appear and opportunity to be heard in proceedings under section 42 of the central act before the ..... of u.p. v. l.j. johnson, : [1983]3scr897 straightway allowed exemption.82. keeping the philosophy underlying the provisions of the central act, it is not possible for us to hold that the declarant can claim the appurtenant land of 500 sq. metres for each of the sheds in question further, in paragraph 8 of the ..... reach each other and hectic efforts are being made to take possession of the land circumventing the provisions of the central act, and defeating the very laudable objectives underlying this welfare legislation. accordingly, we hold that the members of both the societies are not eligible for assignment of the excess land vested in the government as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1995 (HC)

JaIn Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1995

Reported in : AIR1995P& H243; (1995)109PLR614

..... common purposes of the village under section 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act. the management and control whereof vests in the state under section 23 of the aforesaid act.' 'section 2(g)(6) : the land reserved for the common purposes of the village under section 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation andprevention of fragmentation) act 1948 (east punjab act 50 of 1948). the management and control whereof vests in the gram panchayat ..... -proprietors, labourers associated with village economy that such lands were vested in gram panchayat.20. a brief survey of the provisions of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act. 1961 (hereinafter referred to as '1961 act') and the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 is perhaps necessary and essential to comprehend and assess the grounds of challenge.21. the legislature imbibed with the needs of developing village ..... under the consolidation act of 1948 during consolidation proceedings. 'common purposes are defined by the consolidation act of 1948. the management of the land reserved under the consolidation act for common purposes either vested in the state or in the gram panchayat in terms of sections 18 and 23a of the consolidation act of 1948. lands so reserved were described as prescribed under the rule 16 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) rules 1949 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 1995 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. the Director Land Records and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR599

..... of which has been produced as annexure p-2 with the writ petition. by this order, the director, consolidation of holdings, has accepted a petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 filed by respondents 3 to 8. the contention of the respondents 3 to 8 that the action of ..... the authorities under the act in reserving 831 kanals 2 marks of land for common purposes by imposing a pro ..... with in the present case. accordingly, the director has ordered the rectification by amendment of the scheme. the case has been remanded to the consolidation officer for fresh decision. the order is in strict conformity with the provisions of rule 16(ii).6. accordingly, we find no ground to ..... it is pat to notice the provision of rule 16(ii). it provides as under:-'16(ii) in an estate or esates where during consolidation proceedings there is no shamlat deh land or such land is considered inadequate, land shall be reserved for the village panchayat and for other common ..... purpose under section 18(c) of the act, out of the common pool of the village at the scale given in the schedule to these rules. proprietary rights in respect of land .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1995 (HC)

Puran Vs. Financial Commissioner (Appeals)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-16-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR523

..... schools or ponds situated with the sabha area as defined in clause (mmm) of section 3 of the punjab gram panchayat act, 1952, excluding lands reserved for the common purposes of a village under section 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (east punjab act 50 of 1948), the management and control whereof vests in the state government under section 23-a of the aforesaid ..... act;(4a) vacant land situate in abadi deh or gora deh not owned by any person;(5) lands in any ..... effected by the rehabilitation department in respect of the land not covered by section 2(g).7. sections 2(g), 3(2) and (3) of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961, as they stand after amendment by the notification dated 8.5.1995, reads as under:-'2. definitions:-(g) shamilat deh includes -(1) lands described ..... the case.6. one of the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by virtue of the amendment made in the punjab village common lands (regulations) act, 1961 by the amendment act of 1995, the sales effected by the rehabilitation department have received statutory recognition and, therefore, on this ground alone the impugned order should .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1995 (HC)

Jaswant Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-12-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR91

..... issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the orders of the additional director, consolidation of holdings, jalandhar, dated october 8, 1980.2. the petitioner filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) for correction of the entries in the revenue records. according to the petitioner ..... , khasra no. 2014 as recorded in the revenue records, was a gair mumkin rasta and during the consolidation proceedings, khasra no. 332 measuring 1 ..... kanal 13 marlas was carved out of old khasra no. 2014 and it was shown as barani in the consolidation ..... order, respondents nos. 3 and 4 filed a petition under section 42 of the act before the additional director, consolidation of holdings, jalandhar, who by his impugned order dated october 8, 1980, held that the order of the consolidation officer is beyond jurisdiction and accordingly set aside the same. aggrieved by the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1995 (HC)

Bhagwan Singh and ors. Vs. the Director, Consolidation of Holdings and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-06-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR678

..... , this writ petition deserves to be dismissed. on merit, it has been stated that there is no limitation to approach the director, consolidation of holdings under section 42 of the act. otherwise too, the order passed by the authorities is perfectly legal and just. the writ petition being devoid of any substance deserves to ..... question of title which can be determined only by a civil court and till such determination the authorities under the consolidation of holdings act have no jurisdiction to order for determining the share of each shareholder or partitioning of any joint land. accordingly, the order of director ..... n.k. kapoor, j. 1. petitioners seek issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed by the director, consolidation of holdings punjab, dated 23.6.1987 or for issuance of any other writ, order or direction as the court may deem fit and ..... , consolidation of holding deserves to be quashed. reliance has been placed upon the decision of this court in case reported as gurmej singh alias iqbal singh v. the state of punjab and ..... proper in the circumstances of the case.2. respondents no. 2 to 15 filed a petition under section 42 of the consolidation of holdings act against respondent nos. 16 to 24 as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 1995 (SC)

Prof. Ramchandra G. Kapse Vs. Haribansh Ramakbal Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1995

Reported in : AIR1996SC817; 1995(7)SCALE60; (1996)1SCC206; [1995]Supp6SCR471; 1996(1)LC471(SC)

..... evidence to support the allegation of corrupt practice based on the alleged speech of pramod mahajan. the finding of the high court accepting the allegation and holding that a corrupt practice is proved, is clearly untenable and must be set aside.28. the finding of high court that corrupt practices are proved is ..... of prof. kapse to the contents of the speech given by sadhvi reethambara which is alleged to constitute the corrupt practice.14. in badat and co. v. east india trading co. : [1964]4scr19 , it was held that rules 3, 4 and 5 of order 8 of c.p.c. form an integrated code ..... to that effect in the written statement since it was a relevant fact of which evidence could be led under section 11 of the indian evidence act. the fact that evidence is led for proving presence at that time elsewhere to improbabilise the allegation made in the petition without any express pleading to ..... from the written statement, there is specific assertion that sadhvi reethambara was in no way concerned with prof. kapse (respondent in the election petition) and her acts and deeds were not relevant; prof. kapse had not invited her at thane on 21.5.1991 and such allegations were wholly baseless and false; it ..... whose election has been declared void, and by the two notices pramod mahajan and. sadhvi reethambara who have been named under section 99 of the r.p. act for committing certain corrupt practices, on the ground of which the returned candidate's election has been set aside. at the election held on 15.6.1991 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //