Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.050 seconds)

Apr 12 1996 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. the Additional Director, Consolidation and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-12-1996

Reported in : (1997)115PLR391

..... of consolidation. according to ujagar singh and other right holders, after utilising the land for common purposes of the village in the wake of imposition ..... corrected even after a lapse of quarter of a century or so. the action does not become in any way illegal or contrary to the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948.8. in gram panchayat gunia majri v. director, consolidation of holdings and ors. (supra) the right holders had sought re-distribution of the panchayat land through petition under section 42 made by them to the ..... of the village, the consolidation authorities imposed a pro-rata cut on all the right holders of the village. imposition of pro-rata cut on the right holders of the village for the common purposes of the village, is permissible under the provisions of section 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act,1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act no. 50 of 1948) in the scheme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1996 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. the Director, Consolidation of Holdings and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-04-1996

Reported in : (1997)115PLR600

..... the various demands of village community. as per averments made in c.w.p. no. 9205 of 1992 consolidation of holding of this village took place in the year 1952-53. under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 government can of its own accord or on an application declare its intention to make a scheme for ..... consolidation of holdings in such estate or estates or part thereof as may be specified. on publication in the estate concerned, government is to appoint a consolidation officer who after obtaining in ..... 's case (supra) the court was considering the matter in the light of provisions contained in section 2(bb) 23-a and 18 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, the order of additional director vide which some land which was reserved for common purposes by imposing a pro rata cut which was being given to ..... certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the order dated 7.4.1992 passed by director of land records, punjab, exercising the powers under section 42 of the east punjab consolidation of holdings (prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. in the connected writ petition bearing no. 9205 of 1992 bhagwan singh and others have sought issuance of a writ of mandamus, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 1996 (HC)

Basant Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-29-1996

Reported in : (1996)113PLR430

..... dated 13.12.1979 has become final and respondents no. 2 and 3 did not challenge that order, but instead they filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 and the order dated 28.1.1981 came to be passed on the said application. according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the additional director has no power ..... of appeal or in the writ proceedings. on the other hand, the 3rd respondent filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, on 24.1.1980 to abolish the path. on that application, the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, chandigarh held that the path does not lead anywhere and, therefore, allowed the application filed by the said respondent and abolished ..... for running along killa no. 55/3/4. thereafter on 26.7.1979 i.e. nearly 20 years after finalisation of the consolidation proceedings, the 2nd respondent (jagjit singh) made an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948, praying that the passage running along his killa no. 55/3/4/ be cancelled. that application was dismissed by the additional director .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1996 (HC)

Niranjan Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-1996

Reported in : (1996)113PLR740

..... t.h.b. challapathi, j.1. this writ petition is filed for quashing the order of additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab jullunder passed under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentations) act, 1948 (for short the 'act') on 9.12.1980.2. respondents 3 to 6 filed an application before the additional director, pun- jab, jullunder alleging that there was a passage in killa no. 21 of ..... to 6 filed an application for carving out a passage in the year 1979 i.e. nearly 20 years after the finalisation of the consolidation proceedings. i am of the view that section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act 1948 has no application to the facts of the present case. the respondents no. 3 to 6 are claiming a right of passage across ..... no. 34o 6 has filed in the year 1979 i.e. nearly 18 years after the finalisation of the consolidation proceedings and therefore the additional director, consolidation of holdings punjab has no power under section 42 of the act to carve out a passage from his holdings by the impugned order that a passage should be provided at the missing place by remanding the case to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1996 (HC)

Harjit Singh and ors. Vs. State Through Additional Director Consolidat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-17-1996

Reported in : (1997)115PLR542

..... a right of passage to his land across the land of the petitioners and respondents no.3 to 5.6. on a close reading of section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948,i am of the opinion that the application under said section is not maintainable for providing a fresh passage or path to the land of the second respondent. once ..... the consolidation scheme has been framed and implemented, any change in the same cannot be made under section 42 of the act except for the matters specifically provided therein. in harbhajan singh ..... t.h.b. chalapathi, j.1. this writ petition is filed to quash the order of the additional director, consolidation, punjab, mohali dated 15.11.1994 vide annexure p-3.2. respondents 2 to 5 filed an application under section 42 of the consolidation act, 1948 for providing a passage to their land in killa nos. 24/11 and 10 through killa no. 24/112/1 ..... . on that application, the additional director of consolidation by the impugned order directed a path to be provided on the southern side of killa no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1996 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-17-1996

Reported in : (1997)115PLR613

..... and prevention of fragmentation act, 1948 (for short 'the consolidation act'), before respondent no. 2 praying that they are in possession of the land mentioned in khewat no. 40 in jamabandi nos. 2001 and 2002 which was shamilat ..... deh but the consolidation department in 1960 committed a mistake by showing the area in the ownership of gram panchayat whereas respondents nos. 3 to 8 were in possession since ..... holdings, while in c.w.p. no. 686 of 1986 challenge has been given to annexure p-2 and p-7 passed by the said director (respondent no. 2 in both the writ petitions).3. it has been averred in c.w.p. no. 582 of 1986 that respondents nos. 3 to 8 moved an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation ..... any title upon it and it has been rightly ordered vide annexure p-2 that the land be re-distributed amongst the rightful owners by the consolidation authorities. under section 42 of the consolidation act, the director consolidation of holdings has the power to rectify the mistake.7. in c.w.p. no. 686 of 1986, it has been alleged by the gram panchayat that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1996 (HC)

Gulu Ram and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary, Haryana Govt.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-12-1996

Reported in : (1997)117PLR478

..... holders in the revenue estate of village rori, tehsil and district sirsa. a notification under section 14(1) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act) was issued by the state govt. in pursuance of the said notification the consolidation scheme was prepared of the village and it was published on 29.3.1970 and was confirmed on 7.10.1970 ..... . the repartition proceedings as required under section 21(1) of the act was carried on 30.4.1971. it has been ..... have to see whether the orders annexure p.6 suffers from any illegality. vide orders dated 14.12.1977, annexure p.1 additional director, consolidation of holdings haryana exercising the powers under section 42 of the act set aside the orders of consolidation officer dated 26.2.1975 and of settlement officer dated 16.4.76 and directions were given afresh to the ..... on 16.4.1976. later on jagraj singh, respondent no. 4 filed application under section 42 of the act before the additional director, consolidation of holdings haryana who allowed the application of jagraj singh and vide order dated 14.12.77 remanded the case to the consolidation officer vide orders annexure p.1. after the remand, the case was contested by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1996 (HC)

Bachittar Singh and ors. Vs. Director of Land Records and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-03-1996

Reported in : (1996)113PLR555

..... as to quash the order dated 12th may, 1992 passed by the director consolidation (annexure p-4) vide which petition preferred against the order of respondent no. 1 under section 42 of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was allowed and the land in dispute which was earlier mentioned in revenue records ..... , a.i.r. 1989 punjab and haryana 234 was reversed. mr. sharma learned counsel representing the respondents, however, vehemently contends that but for badhitter ..... a year only i.e. year 1988-89 he had no locus standi. it was, thus not incumbent upon the director of consolidation of holdings to hear him.3. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the records of the case the court is ..... tenant at the time when the petition under section 42 of the act was filed and he continued to be holding the land upto the time he was evicted from the land under the orders of director consolidation, it shall be wholly immaterial as to whether he was initially given ..... act nor they were heard as thus the impugned order deserves to be set aside. in support of this contention the learned counsel representing the petitioner cites the judgment of the apex court in swaran singh v. state of punjab, (1994-3)108 p.l.r. 206 (s.c.) in which the view expressed in joginder singh and ors. v. director, consolidation of holdings punjab .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1996 (HC)

Niranjan Singh and anr. Vs. Additional Director, Consolidation of Hold ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-1996

Reported in : (1996)113PLR729

..... limited relief for which they staked their claim through a petition filed by them under section 41 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention or fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) was denied to them by director consolidation of holdings vide orders (annexure p-3) dated 7th january 1992. it is this order of the director which has ..... been challenged by the petitioners in this writ petition filed by them under article 226 of the constitution of india. the relief asked for by them either before director consolidation ..... of holdings ..... the petitioners filed an application under section 42 of the act and claimed passage to their fields leading to khasra no. 708. this as mentioned above has been denied to them vide impugned order annexure p-3. the director consolidation of holdings in his impugned order had denied the desired relief to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1996 (SC)

Puran Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-18-1996

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)639; AIR1996SC1092; JT1996(1)SC362; 1996(4)KarLJ47; (1996)113PLR700; 1996(1)SCALE380; (1996)2SCC205; [1996]1SCR730; 1996(1)LC241(SC)

..... behalf of sham singh, the father of the appellants.2. pursuant to a notification issued by the state government under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 a scheme was prepared by the authorities in respect of holdings belonging to sham singh, the father of the appellants, bir singh, father of respondent nos. 2 and 3, wazir singh respondent no. 4, om ..... interest of such respondent has devolved on them.8. in the case of ram kola and ors. v. assistant director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, rohtak and ors. a full bench of three judges held that article 137 of the schedule to the limitation act does not apply to an application for adding or substituting a party to a petition under article 226 of the ..... petitioner or the appellant has become final.12. so far the facts of the present appeal is concerned, bir singh died on 9th december, 1971. the dispute related to consolidation of holding of lands. after the death of bir singh the right title and interest in the land shall be deemed to have devolved on his legal representative. as such the right ..... , the father of the appellants filed the aforesaid writ petition (civil writ no. 931 of 1966) for quashing the order dated 15th october 1965 passed by the additional director, consolidation of holdings. during the pendency of the said writ petition, sham singh died and appellants were substituted in his place. when the writ petition was taken up for hearing by the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //