Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.040 seconds)

Dec 21 2001 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Dalmia Industries P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)734; 96(2002)DLT441; 2002(62)DRJ1; 2002RLR309

..... 5060 sq. metrescomprising khasra no. 253/2 min., 563 % 564 in village abadi (firni) of bijwasan,tehsil mehrauli, new delhi. consolidation proceedings were initiated in this villagevide consolidation scheme 218 dated 2.5.1975 under east punjab holdings(consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 along with delhi landreforms act resulting in land being declared within village abadi (firni) and making itentitled to the benefit of notification dated 24.8.1963 ..... exempting it from buildingregulations contained in sections 332 to 336, 342 and 347 of delhi municipalcorporation act, 1957 (dmca). respondents 1-2 ..... of the building plans beforecommencement of construction. 7. it is not in dispute that the afore-mentioned village has been declared to be within village 'abadi' under the provisions of east punjab (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 read with delhi land reforms act. sections332 and 336 relate to building plans. sections 312 and 313, as noticed herein before,relate to public streets. the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2001 (SC)

Ghulam Qadir Vs. Special Tribunal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2001

Reported in : JT2001(9)SC231; 2001(6)SCALE667; (2002)1SCC33

..... scheme for the consolidation of the holdings and in 1955 the consolidation officer proposed substitution of some other lands of lesser value for the lands allotted to the petitioners. another notification was ..... of law.39. in state of punjab v. suraj prakash kapur, etc. : [1962]2scr711 : [1962]2scr711 this court dealt with the cases of the evacuees from pakistan who were allotted some land on quasi-permanent tenure. after the allotment, the state government issued a notification under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 declaring its intention to make a ..... cannot be equated with that of a full-fledged appeal. having regard to the language of section 15(5) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949, it was held that the revisional power under the said act conferred powers which included the examination of the legality and propriety of the order under revision,and for that the high ..... the department of rehabilitation no.4891-s or 4892-s, under the 8th july, 1949; or (b) by the notification of the government of patiala and east punjab states union in the department of rehabilitation no.8r or 9r, dated the 23rd july, 1949, and published in the official gazette of that state, dated the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2001 (SC)

Kewal Krishan Vs. Harnek Singh (Lead) by Lr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Reported in : AIR2001SC1454; 2001(3)MPHT143; 2001(2)SCALE568a; (2001)9SCC117

s.n. variava, j.1. leave granted.2. respondent absent inspite of service.3. we have heard mr. gaur. mr. gaur submits that appellant/plaintiff was present in court and ready to give evidence but was not permitted to do so. mr. gaur states that if given one more opportunity the appellant will, on the date/s fixed for hearing by the trial court, keep himself and all his witnesses available in court and will lead their evidence without fail. mr. gaur states that the appellant will not ask for adjournment on any ground whatsoever.4. in our view, end of justice requires that the appellant be given one more opportunity of leading evidence. accordingly the order closing the evidence of the appellant is set aside. the trial court is directed to permit the appellant to lead his evidence.5. the appeal stands disposed of accordingly. appellant to pay to the respondent costs fixed at rs. 500/-.

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2001 (HC)

K.C. Bajaj Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-09-2001

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC556

..... apex court has held as under:- 'there is no provision in the east punjab holdings (constitution and prevention of fragmentation) act granting express power of review to the state government with regard to an order made under section 42 of the act. in the absence of any such express power, the director, consolidation of holdings, cannot review his previous order of dismissing the application of the petitioner ..... under section 42 of the act. hence, the subsequent review order of the ..... true there is nothing in article 226 of the constitution to preclude the high court from exercising the power of review which inheres in every court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. but, there are definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. the power ..... statute specifically provides for it, obviously when a review is sought due to a procedural defect, the inadvertent error committed by the tribunal must be corrected ex debito justitiae to prevent the abuse of the its process, and such power inheres in every court or tribunal.' (21). in meera bhanja v. nirmala kumari choudhary (5), the apex court held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //