Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.041 seconds)

Dec 05 2008 (HC)

Dy. Commissioner Vs. Ramesh Kumari and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-05-2008

Reported in : 156(2009)DLT133

..... these petitions, including the two contempt petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment.relevant facts2. on 17th april 1986 a notification was issued under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ('holdings act') by the competent authority commencing the process of consolidation of land in the village kapashera in new delhi. pursuant to the said notification dated 17th april 1986 the ..... refer in my affidavit was purchased in 1994-95. the documents produced by me today pertain to those lands.i do not recollect filing any objections before the consolidation officer under section 21 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation), act. i am not in a position to either refuse or admit the suggestion that i had filed any objections under section 21 of the ..... east punjab holdings act.q. can you tell the court whether pursuant to order dated 1.12.1995, when were you put in your physical possession of the exchanged land and which officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2008 (HC)

NaraIn Singh and anr. Vs. Financial Commissioner

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-2008

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ122

..... territory of delhi and ors. reported in : 69(1997)dlt957 . the court in this case was considering the applicability of east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 and the rules framed there under after issue of notification under section 507 of the act by which the village was declared to be an urbanized village. another contention raised by the petitioners therein was with reference to ..... section 12 of the delhi development act, 1957 as the area in question had been declared to be a development area. ..... would continue to remain agricultural land and will not affect its status. consequently, it cannot have any effect on the on going process of consolidation, which is being carried out under a valid piece of legislation, namely, consolidation act, the object of which is to provide for better cultivation of land within the estate concerned.37. section 150(3)(e) of the ..... by mr. maman singh to the petitioners by two sale deeds dated 4th may, 1989 had resulted in violation of section 33 of the reforms act as mr. maman singh was left with uneconomic holding in form of land in extended abadi located in khasra no. 23/18/2 measuring 1 bigha 7 bids was and, thereforee, consequences as stipulated .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2008 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Vs. Addl. Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2008

Reported in : (2008)152PLR478

..... no. 1.).2. respondent no. 3 bant singh and respondent no. 4 waryam singh filed an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the act of 1948') before respondent no. 1 which was allowed vide order dated november 18, 1981. the relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under:this petition is aimed ..... the same is to be ignored. mr. markan has relied upon division bench judgments of this court reported as gram panchayat, village bhedpura v. additional director, consolidation, punjab ; bhagwan singh and ors. v. the director, consolidation of holdings, punjab and ors. 1997 (2) r.c.r. (civil) 365 : 1997 (1) p.l.j. 458 and gurjant singh and anr. v. commissioner, ferozepur ..... this court in support of his claim reported as gurdial singh v. the state of haryana ; gram panchayat, chalela and anr. v. the director, consolidation of holdings, punjab and ors. ; gram panchayat, bhattian bet v. additional director, consolidation, punjab and ors. (2005-2) 140 p.l.r. 275; gram panchayat, village shekhupur v. union of india and ors. ; gram panchayat, village ..... to make a mention of sections 18, 21, 23-a and 42 of the 1948 act. section 18 of the act of 1948 deals with the land reserved for common purposes whereas section 21 deals with repartition in accordance with scheme of consolidation of holdings. section 23-a of the act deals with the management and control of lands for common purposes. sections 18, 21 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2008 (HC)

Balwinder Singh Vs. Director Land Record and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-11-2008

Reported in : (2008)152PLR118

..... petitioner filed an appeal against the said order under section 21(4) and (6) of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') before the additional director, consolidation. the said appeal was dismissed on 18.11.2005 while observing as under:.at the time of consolidation land of the respondent has cut according to his share thus he is entitled to path ..... of 2007 which have been filed by the petitioner with regard to the same property.2. in this case, vide order dated 29.5.1962, passed by the settlement officer, consolidation of holdings, a two karms path was carved out for ingress and outgress of respondents no. 3 to 5. for carving out of the said path, 13 marlas land of ujagar ..... the father of the petitioner never filed any appeal against the order dated 29.5.1962 passed by the settlement officer, consolidation of holdings and the appeal filed by the petitioner after more than 43 years was rightly dismissed.5. with regard to the second petition i.e. c.w.p. no. 1235 of ..... appeal to be dismissed and the order under appeal is maintained intact.against the said order, the petitioner filed a petition under section 42 of the act which has also been dismissed by the director, consolidation vide order dated 24.11.2005. the petitioner has challenged these orders in the writ petition.3. in the second writ petition, i.e. c.w .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2008 (HC)

Gurnam Singh and ors. Vs. Additional Director, Consolidation of Holdin ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-13-2008

Reported in : (2008)152PLR763

..... , p-5 and p-2) respectively, passed by respondent no. 1, namely, the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, chandigarh.2. twenty five years after the conclusion of consolidation proceedings, respondent no. 2, filed a petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') praying that the deficiency in the land allotted to him be made good. respondents no. 3 ..... to 6 were arrayed as respondents. vide order dated 31.7.1981, the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, accepted the application and held that respondent no. 2 was entitled ..... notice should, therefore, have been issued is placed upon bachan singh and ors. v. the director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, chandigarh 1991 p.l.j. 275.it is further argued that the additional director, consolidation, had no jurisdiction to recall the order dated 5.11.1982, as the act does not confer any power of review. while dismissing the petitioners' application, praying that the order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2008 (HC)

Kahla Singh Vs. Additional Director Consolidation of Holdings and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Reported in : (2009)3PLR750

..... referred to as 'the act') against the jumla mushtarka malkan land and siri guru teg bahadur college, respondent no. 12, praying that as there was a short fall of 2 ..... additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab, whereby land in petitioner's possession has been allotted to the original respondents no. 3 to 11, now represented by their legal representatives.2. consolidation proceedings were finalised in the year 1957-58. on 30.6.1982, respondents no. 3 to 11, filed a petition under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter ..... std. kanals, in the land allotted to them during consolidation, the shortfall be made good from the bachat land. vide order dated 28.10.1982, killa ..... treated at par for allotment of land to respondents no. 3 to 11. the impugned order does not set out any reason that led the additional director, consolidation, to hold that land in occupation of the petitioner was the land most suited for allotment to respondents no. 3 to 11 and, therefore, deserves to be set aside. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2008 (HC)

Smt. Bhekhalu Devi Vs. Smt. Ram Ditti and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-25-2008

Reported in : 2008(2)ShimLC412

..... act, recourse must be had to section 117 of the punjab revenue act, 1887, to decide question of title with respect to partition proceedings. these observations were made in the ..... suggested by the legislature for him for decision of that question.17. to similar effect is the full bench judgment of the punjab and haryana high court in ajit singh v. smt. subaghan and ors. , where the court held that if in proceedings under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, the question cannot be decided by the officer so vested with powers under the ..... counsel also relies upon the judgment of this court in state of himachal pradesh v. sandhya devi 2003(1) cur.l.j. (h.p.) 314, holding that section 163 of the h.p. land revenue act is a complete code and the civil court has no jurisdiction to determine the matters covered by that provision. there is no dispute to this proposition ..... of the assistant collector 1st grade placed on the file clearly show that he has acted in a cursory manner.15. learned counsel for the appellant referred to a decision of the punjab and haryana high court in daya singh v. ajaib singh 1979 p.l.j. 369, holding that where a revenue officer rightly or wrongly concludes that no question of title .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2008 (HC)

Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka V ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-2008

Reported in : AIR2008NOC2790(FB); ILR2008(3)KAR2895; 2008(4)KarLJ593; 2008(4)KLJ593; 2008(5)AIRKarR261; AIR2008NOC2790(FB)

..... leant the regional language will lead to alienation from the mainstream of life resulting in linguistic fragmentation within the state, which is an anathema to national integration. the learning of different languages will ..... . several associations, management and some persons submitted their opinion in writing to the committee. the consolidated report of the said opinion was also enclosed to the said report. some of the members of ..... well as correspondence. when we refer to south india, it may mean to hold good in respect of certain parts of east india i.e., bengal, orissa and assam states. however, english is an ..... to ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere and infrastructure (including qualified staff) and the prevention of mal-admission by those in charge of management. the constitution recognises the right of the individual ..... 1scr568 in siddarajabhai sabbaj v. state of bombay air 1963 sc 540 d.a.v. college v. state of punjab : air1971sc1737 ahmedabad st. xaviers college society v. state of gujarat : [1975]1scr173 in indra sawhney v. union ..... a resolution accepted by the government of india and published in its gazette on 14th august 1948, which contains the following passage.the principle that a child should be instructed in the early ..... english medium schools association, is the petitioner. it is a society-registered under the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 on 15.11.1989. it consists of recognized, unaided english medium primary and secondary schools .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //