Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: east punjab holdings consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act 1948 Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.038 seconds)

May 04 2010 (HC)

Shrimati Lakhwinder Kaur and ors. Vs. Sadar Anjuman Ahmediyya Qadian a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-04-2010

..... the society.81. it was next contended by the learned senior counsel for the respondents, that from 7.6.1963 to 28.2.1964, the consolidation of holdings commenced under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 and in khatoni istemal ex. p8/d2, the society was recorded as owner in column no. 4 and in possession in column no. 5, ..... was recorded as owner in possession in the subsequent jamabandi.95. as already observed above, the order passed by the additional director under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was also set aside by the high court.96. the learned senior counsel for the respondents also contended, that it was not open to the defendant/appellants ..... the order passed by the additional director, east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 was set aside by the high court in cwp no. 4691 of 1982 ex. ph and, thus, plaintiff no. 1 was recorded as owners of the ..... plaintiff/respondents filed a suit for possession on 22.1.1980, whereas on 6.9.1982, the additional director, exercising the powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 ordered the deletion of name of the society as owner and change it in the name of central government, on the petition filed by the appellants.86. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 2010 (SC)

Harbhajan Singh. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-23-2010

..... for the consolidation of holdings confirmed under the act may, "at any time", be varied or revoked by the authority which ..... 16(1) of the act to cancel the declaration under section 14(1) of the act.13. for this conclusion, we are supported by the decision of the full bench of the punjab high court in chahat khan bahadur khan and others v. the state of punjab and others (supra) cited by mr. narasimha. section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 provided that a scheme ..... confirms it subject to any order of the state government that may be made in relation thereto and a subsequent scheme may be prepared, published and confirmed in accordance with the provisions of the act. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2010 (HC)

Onkar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-2010

..... gram panchayat or the state government on the basis of sub-section (6) of section 2(g) and the explanation appended thereto or any other provisions of the act or the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. the crux of the matter appears to be that the land of the proprietors which has remained un-utilised for village common purposes would continue to be the ..... 23-a of the act of 1948 and rule 16(ii) of the rules of 1949 cover all such lands ..... :i) sub-section (6) of section 2(g) of the punjab village common lands (regulation) act, 1961 and the explanation appended thereto, is only an elucidation of the existing provisions of the said act read with provisions contained in the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948;ii) the un-amended provisions of the act of 1961 and, in particular, section 2(g)(1) read with sections 18 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2010 (HC)

Virender Singh and ors. Vs Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-2010

..... digest?order.1. the two petitioners by this writ petition impugn the order dated 19th october, 2007 of the financial commissioner in exercise of powers under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation & prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948. this court while issuing notice of the petition, vide order dated 3rd december, 2007 directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to title, possession and construction on ..... reduced. though the counsel for the petitioners could not answer but i find that the petitioners in ground 10 of the petition have stated that their holding has been fragmented owing to the order aforesaid of the consolidation officer. the same would undoubtedly be prejudicial to the petitioners.16. the legislature has vested finality in the order of the financial commissioner. the question ..... improvements on the land is a finding of fact incapable of interference. similarly though sh. dharambir singh and the respondent no.2 had an equal preferential right in the pre-consolidated holding but the fact remains that the mutation had not been carried out in the name of the petitioners though they are admittedly the sons of sh. dharambir singh. it thus ..... no.2 and allotted another plot/land to the respondent no.2 on re-partition.4. the two petitioners herein are the sons of sh. dharambir singh. the pre-consolidation holding of the respondent no.2 was joint with the said sh. dharambir singh and certain others and who had expressed desire for separation. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2010 (HC)

Joginder Singh and ors. Vs. Chandigarh Administration and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-23-2010

Reported in : (2010)158PLR381

..... 12 bighas 5 biswas, situated in village manimajra, u.t. chandigarh, as per jamabandi for the year 1956-57 (p-1). in the year 1958-59, repartition under the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act had taken place and the petitioners were allotted land comprised in killa no. 58//13/2, 14, 15/1, 16/2 and 17, total measuring 21 kanals 19 marlas ..... a notification for acquisition of the land in question for the public purpose, namely, for the capital of punjab. the said notification was followed by another notification dated 29.12.1955, issued under section 6 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (for brevity, 'the act') [p-6]. the petitioners have claimed that at no point of time any notice, intimation or information for ..... the chandigarh housing board in its various schemes to those oustees whose houses were acquired before, on or after 1.11.1966 for the purposes of development of capital of punjab (chandigarh). provision of 5% reservation was made for the oustees in different schemes of the chandigarh housing board. in the said affidavit other details regarding reservation of dwelling units under ..... the matter. the union territory of chandigarh came into being with effect from 01.11.1966. initially the land was utilized for brick kilns for setting up the capital of punjab and later on rehabilitation colony was constructed thereupon. in the given situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioners for de-notifying the land and for change of mutation in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //