Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: formation of contract indian contract act Court: allahabad Year: 1909 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.019 seconds)

Jul 01 1909 (PC)

Angad Singh Vs. Srinath Das

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-01-1909

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.403

..... the acceptors renders the fusion of a and b into one juristic person indispensable. such an incorporation, however, is not enough for the formation of the contract which creates a joint liability. the acceptance has to be expressed so that the contract may be formed. but a juristic person is incapable of giving expression to an acceptance or of doing any other executive ..... are present inasmuch as a joint act by two or more natural persons, without the formation of one juristic person which is represented by one natural person, is, as has already been shown, inconceivable. this leads me to remark that the expression when two or more persons make a joint promise 'in section 43 of the indian contract act, cannot be taken to mean that ..... to be done by a corporation. the correct and comprehensive proposition ', says sir frederick pollock, in his principles of contract p. 117, 7th edition, 'is that a corporation can do no executive act except by an agent and a corporate seal is only one way of showing that the person entrusted with it is an authorised agent of the corporate body '. the ..... a joint promise can proceed from them without their fusion into one juristic person who is represented by one natural person. the expression states the net result and does not go into the process which brings about that result.5. having analysed a joint contract and set forth the three .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //