Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu adoptions and maintenance act 1956 section 27 maintenance when to be a charge Court: delhi Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.097 seconds)

Jul 06 1993 (HC)

Smt. Neelam Molhotra Vs. Rajinder Malhotra and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-06-1993

Reported in : II(1993)DMC547; 1993(26)DRJ46

..... no separate provision in the hindu adoptions and maintenance act, 1956 (for short the act), for grant of maintenance pendente lite. section 18 of the act, under which the case of the plaintiff in essence is based, only provides for maintenance to a hindu wife, subject however to the two exceptions, carved out in sub-section (3) of section 18 of the act, which extinguish the right of a hindu wife to a separate residence ..... , has prima facie shown sufficient facts which entitle her and require that she should be given some amount as interim maintenance.10. the next question which remains to be considered is as to what should be the amount of interim maintenance particularly when, based on professional accounts of defendant no. 1, it is strenuously urged on his behalf, that he does not ..... the wife is residing separately from the husband not under any of the circumstances enumerated under sub-section (2) of the said section or is unchaste or has ceased to be a hindu by conversion to another religion.8. that being the position in law, when it is imperative for the husband to maintain his wife, it does not stand to any reason ..... is whether the moveable and immovable assets belonging to the other defendants could also be taken into consideration for determining the earning capacity and social status of the husband particularly when it is alleged that all the assets acquired by the defendants, including defendant no. 1, are out of the joint family business being run under the name and style .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1993 (HC)

Neelam Malhotra Vs. Rajinder Malhotra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-06-1993

Reported in : AIR1994Delhi234; 51(1993)DLT588; 1993(26)DRJ469

..... no separate provision in the hindu adoptions and maintenance act, 1956 (for short the 'act'), for grant of maintenance pendente lite. section 18 of the act, under which the case of the plaintiff in essence is based, only provides for maintenance to a hindu wife, subject however to the two exceptions, carved out in sub-section (3) of section 18 of the act, which extinguish the right of a hindu wife to a separate residence ..... has prima facie shown sufficient facts which entitle her and require that she should be given some amount as interim maintenance. (10) the next question which remains to be considered is as to what should be the amount of interim maintenance particularly when, based on professional accounts of defendant no.1, it is strenously urged on his behalf that he does not ..... the wife is residing separately from the husband not under any of the circumstances enumerated under sub-section (2) of the said section or is unchaste or has ceased to be a hindu by conversion to another religion. (8) that being the position in law, when it is imperative for the husband to maintain his wife, it does not stand to any reason ..... is whether the moveable and immoveable assets belonging to the other defendants could also be taken into consideration for determining the earning capacity and social status of the husband particularly when it is alleged that all the assets acquired by the defendants, including defendant no.i, are out of the joint family business being run under the name and style .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 1993 (TRI)

Deepak Singh and Family (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-1993

Reported in : (1994)48ITD465(Delhi)

..... revised the return on 5-11-1983. the assessing officer adopted the business income as declared in the revised return as share income in partnership firm varun enterprises subject to rectification under section 154/155 of the income-tax act and simultaneously initiated penalty proceedings on the assessee for having concealed ..... not been refuted by the agent shri vipin mehra or by the institution, the transaction of donation was complete.shri vipin mehra made serious charges on the assessee by way of sending a letter to the assessee on 25-10-1983 but later on in his affidavit dated 9-11 ..... knowledge of department. therefore, the assessee revised its return. it was submitted that conspiracy to defraud revenue originated as back as in june 1982 when the estimates for the advance-tax were filed by the assessee, in which the assessee claimed donation under chapter via for rs. 5 lakhs. ..... project in village joyrambati, district bankura of west bengal. the learned departmental representative pointed out that letter dated 27-9-1982, is not a letter authorising shri vipin mehra to collect donations. however, if we read this letter along with letter dated 21 ..... agent of ramakrishna vivekananda mission and he has represented as such. to support this contention, the assessee had filed copy of letter dated 27-9-1982 in which the governing body of the mission has requested to extend the cooperation to help the mission in fulfilling the village development .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1993 (HC)

Kuldip Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-1993

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ490; (1993)IILLJ422Del

..... to provisions of articles of association and sections 269, 316 and other applicable provisions of the companies act, 1956, for a period of two years from the date on which new duly elected managing director assumes office whichever is earlier.' when these minutes came for confirmation in the ..... filed on 31 july 1991.(4) the second respondent is not a government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act, 1956. for the purpose of that act,govemment company means any company in which riot less than 51% of the paid up share capital ..... uti), industrial finance corporation of india (ifci) and general insurance corporation of india (gic) as per notification issued under sub-section (2) of section 4a of the act. the shareholding of the second respondent is as under:- ____________________________________________________________________________ name of the institution no of % age shares ____________________________________________________________________________ private ..... authority to the affected party. no matter by what means the duty is imposed. if a positive obligation exists mandamus cannot be denied.(27) in all india sainik schools employees association v. the defense ministercumchairman, board of governors, sainik school society, new delhi and others ..... entitled to three months salary in lieu of notice after dues, if any. from him to the company. by letter dated 27 june 1991 the petitioner asked the c.m.d. to give him reasons as to why he was issued the letter of termination .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //