Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu marriges validation of proceedings act 1960 Court: chennai Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 9 results (0.067 seconds)

Dec 02 2016 (HC)

T. Devi Malar Vs. S. Meenesh Ganapathy

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Dec-02-2016

..... a purposeful interpretation. it is the residence of the wife, which determines the question of jurisdiction, in case the proceeding was initiated at the instance of the wife. 22. while considering a provision like section 19 (iii-a) of the hindu marriage act, the objects and reasons which prompted the parliament to incorporate such a provision has also to be taken note of ..... to safe-guard the interest and rights of the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court where she resides.'' 6. in view ..... .cmp(md)no.108 of 2010, dated 03.03.2011, the madurai bench of madras high court, has observed as below:- ''18. it is true that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, has been amended by insertion of proviso of (iii)(a) to section 19. of course, this amended section 19(iii)(a) gives special preference to the wife to file ..... . sub clause (iii-a) was inserted in section 19 with a specific purpose. experience is the best teacher. the government found the difficulties faced by women in the matter of initiation of matrimonial proceedings. the report submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2016 (HC)

Jamuna and Others Vs. Rajkumar and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-28-2016

..... a purposeful interpretation. it is the residence of the wife, which determines the question of jurisdiction, in case the proceeding was initiated at the instance of the wife. 22. while considering a provision like section 19 (iii-a) of the hindu marriage act, the objects and reasons which prompted the parliament to incorporate such a provision has also to be taken note of ..... to safe-guard the interest and rights of the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court where she resides.'' 8. in view ..... .cmp(md)no.108 of 2010, dated 03.03.2011, the madurai bench of madras high court, has observed as below:- ''18.it is true that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, has been amended by insertion of proviso of (iii)(a) to section 19. of course, this amended section 19(iii)(a) gives special preference to the wife to file ..... . sub clause (iii-a) was inserted in section 19 with a specific purpose. experience is the best teacher. the government found the difficulties faced by women in the matter of initiation of matrimonial proceedings. the report submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2016 (HC)

S. Renugadevi Vsersu M. Vijaykumar

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-16-2016

..... a purposeful interpretation. it is the residence of the wife, which determines the question of jurisdiction, in case the proceeding was initiated at the instance of the wife. 22. while considering a provision like section 19 (iii-a) of the hindu marriage act, the objects and reasons which prompted the parliament to incorporate such a provision has also to be taken note of ..... to safe-guard the interest and rights of the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court where she resides.'' 5. in view ..... .cmp(md)no.108 of 2010, dated 03.03.2011, the madurai bench of madras high court, has observed as below:- ''18.it is true that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, has been amended by insertion of proviso of (iii)(a) to section 19. of course, this amended section 19(iii)(a) gives special preference to the wife to file ..... . sub clause (iii-a) was inserted in section 19 with a specific purpose. experience is the best teacher. the government found the difficulties faced by women in the matter of initiation of matrimonial proceedings. the report submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2016 (HC)

Saravana Pandian Vs. The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Principa ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Jul-15-2016

..... , is to pass a reasoned, speaking order on merits by adverting to the objections raised and scrupulously adhering to the relevant provisions of the tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1959, (ofcourse by providing adequate opportunity to the concerned trustees and others, if any). liberty is granted to the petitioner and other trustees to raise ..... andce department is only incharge secretary of hr and ce department and his original post is commissioner, hrandce department. further, under section 53 of the tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1959, as secretary of the government, can deal with the charges. moreover, the second respondent/commissioner, hrandce department can also appoint another secretary. in short, ..... v. the government of tamil nadu heandce, reported in 2014 (2) tlnj 423 (civil), had held that the power under section 45 of the tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1959, cannot be exercised by the commissioner unless the government prescribes the circumstances/conditions, upon which such appointment could be made etc. 21. the learned counsel ..... petitioner that the commissioner/hr and ce department/same person is acting in dual capacity and by invoking section 45(1) of the tamil nadu hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1959, he has predetermined to pass order for taking over of the institution before disposing of the enquiry proceedings. yet another argument advanced on behalf of the petitioner is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

R. Magudesh Vs. M. Sathya

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-03-2016

..... of the wife, which determines the question of jurisdiction, in case the proceeding was initiated at the instance of the wife. 22. while considering a provision like section 19 (iii-a) of the hindu marriage act, the objects and reasons which prompted the parliament to incorporate such a provision ..... the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court ..... the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court ..... which is pending before the family court, trichy. 3. the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that section 21-a of the hindu marriage act enumerates that the subsequent petition filed by the respondent is to be transferred to be tried along with the petition filed by the petitioner, ..... has also to be taken note of. sub clause (iii-a) was inserted in section 19 with a specific purpose. experience is the best teacher. the government found the difficulties faced by women in the matter of initiation of matrimonial proceedings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2016 (HC)

M. Viashnavi Vs. C. Sathish Kumar

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Oct-21-2016

..... a purposeful interpretation. it is the residence of the wife, which determines the question of jurisdiction, in case the proceeding was initiated at the instance of the wife. 22. while considering a provision like section 19 (iii-a) of the hindu marriage act, the objects and reasons which prompted the parliament to incorporate such a provision has also to be taken note of ..... to safe-guard the interest and rights of the women, who are being subjected to harassment and cruelty. but this special preference conferred under section 19(iii)(a) of the hindu marriage act shall not be used to wreck vengeance on the husband. there must be a justifiable cause to select the jurisdiction of the court where she resides.'' 7. in view ..... .cmp(md)no.108 of 2010, dated 03.03.2011, the madurai bench of madras high court, has observed as below:- ''18.it is true that section 19 of the hindu marriage act, has been amended by insertion of proviso of (iii)(a) to section 19. of course, this amended section 19(iii)(a) gives special preference to the wife to file ..... . sub clause (iii-a) was inserted in section 19 with a specific purpose. experience is the best teacher. the government found the difficulties faced by women in the matter of initiation of matrimonial proceedings. the report submitted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2016 (HC)

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Through its Join ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Dec-23-2016

..... .a3 and a4 to a7, it is seen that pw1 and one k.r.arumugam chettiar were representing the 6th respondent in the writ petition as well as proceeding before the joint commissioner hindu religious and charitable endowments department, when appellant appointed a fit person and tried to interfere with the management of the 6th respondent. it is not in dispute that ..... is nothing on record to disprove the evidence of pw1 and exs.a1 to a10. the learned 1st appellate judge has considered all the materials on record and has given valid and cogent reasons for setting aside the judgment and decree of trial court. there is no error of law or fact in the said judgment. therefore, the substantial questions of ..... the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 12. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that suit is not maintainable and is barred in view of provision of hindu religious and charitable endowments act and relied on the judgments reported in 2003 (1) ctc 484 [inspector/fit person h.r. and c.e. department, arulmighu sundaresa gnaniar koil cholakadai street, dharapuram] and ..... nagarathar enter the temple and worship. the learned counsel further contended that the suit filed by the sixth respondent is not maintainable as per section 108 of the hindu religious and charitable endowments act. 8. per contra, the learned counsel for the 6th respondent submitted that the 6th respondent by oral and documentary evidence proved that the 6th respondent temple was established .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2016 (HC)

P. Krishnamoorthy and Others Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Aug-17-2016

..... that apart, the learned special government pleader for the respondent nos.1, 2 and 4 takes an emphatic plea that the proceedings under section 26 of the tamilnadu hindu religious and charitable endowments act, are only summary in nature and no notice or enquiry is contemplated under the said section. in the instant case, ..... them. 5.6. the learned counsel for the petitioners strenuously projects an argument that the 2nd respondent/joint commissioner, hindu religous and charitable endowments department, madurai, had passed the impugned proceedings in a mechanical manner without adverting to the very earlier order passed in o.a.no.25 of 1978 under ..... 20.05.2016 to the other hereditary trustees listing out the charges purported to be one under section 26 (h) of hrandce act in order to initiate proceedings under section 26 to supersede the hereditary trusteeship as well as the board of trustees. 3.7. it is to be remembered that ..... the order is passed at original stage. to put it precisely, 'rules of natural justice' can operate only in cases not covered by any law validly made. 26.12. there is no two opinion of a vital fact that 'natural justice' is an antithesis of an arbitrariness. since non-arbitrariness is ..... temple cannot operate separately. in fact, in respect of 'functioning' of the board of trustees, in g.o.ms.no.4524, revenue, dated 05.11.1960, rules were framed in exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (viii) and (ix) of sub-section (2) of section 116 read with sections 47, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2016 (HC)

R. Anbazhagan Vs. The Central Bank of India, Through its Regional Mana ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Apr-29-2016

..... the panel of valuers. during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents-bank submitted that an order, blacklisting the appellant, valuer, would be communicated. communication of the proceedings of blacklisting, on the finding of lack of professionalism and deficiencies in the work, without calling upon the valuer, would certainly affect the reputation of the valuer. therefore, at this ..... of uttar pradesh, by general order, terminated the appointments of all the government counsel (civil, criminal, revenue) in all the districts of the state and directed preparation of fresh panels. validity of the said action was challenged. the hon'ble supreme court framed two questions for consideration, viz., (i) is the impugned circular is amenable to judicial review ? ; and (ii ..... was only a valuer and he is not excepted to ascertain the ownership of the property. he was not given any details, regarding ownership. the bank has not given any valid reason for deletion of his name. he has discharged his duties from 07.08.2004, as an empanelled valuer, ascertaining the value of the building, physical features and market ..... the valuers, for the purpose of valuation of the properties to be sold, under the provisions of sarfaesi act, 2002, it has been made clear that inclusion in the panel is subject to certain conditions and removal would be done, without assigning any reasons. proceedings, dated 16.03.2012, of the assistant general manager, central bank of india, regional office, madurai, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2016 (HC)

K.M. Balasubramaniyam and Another Vs. Director of Town and Country Pla ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-2016

..... had obtained 'noc' from the district officer, fire and rescue department, government of tamilnadu for the 'lakshmi mahal' dated 11.06.2014 in proceedings no.o.mu. no. 5077/a2/2014 valid for three years period. in respect of 'p.b. mahal', the 'noc' was issued on 11.06.2014 in ..... 2007 had stated that the marriage halls were not constructed in terms of the town and country planning act 1971 and that the 3rd respondent/municipality was directed to proceed in terms of the town and country planning act, by means of an order dated 29.02.2008. further, the division bench of this court in ..... he submitted an appeal building plan for approval on 22.08.2015 and as per section 56(4)(a) of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971, the notice dated 24.07.2015 shall not have any effect pending final determination. in effect, the stand of the petitioners is that further ..... were made to the effect that the petitioners' building plan for approval before the appellate authority under section 49 of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971 is pending. added further, it is the plea of the petitioners that the impugned order dated 27.10.2015 of the 3rd respondent is issued ..... from the 3rd respondent / municipality. as such, the very initiation of action against the petitioners under section 57 of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971 is against law and facts and circumstances of the case. 10. the learned counsel for the petitioners proceeds to take a stand that in the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //